I would say that ND did a GOOD JOB keeping up with a TEAM that it WASN'T LIKELY TO BEAT given the players ON THE FIELD on THAT NIGHT.
ND COULDN'T RUN ITS GROUND GAME. NOR COULD IT STOP OSU'S OFFENSE, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT COUNTED.
As for the SEMANTICS, how about ND WAS OVERMATCHED in that its OL couldn't RUN BLOCK, its DL and LB's COULDN'T CONTAIN OSU'S BACKS OR QB-RUN GAME, its DL COULDN'T APPLY ANY PRESSURE, its O went most of the game without any CHUNK PLAYS, and with the game on the line, its more VULNERABLE CB, despite having POSSIBLY saved two games (USC and PSU), couldn't match up with OSU's BEST RECEIVER.
And, yes, that last example may have involved coaching. Yet, what gameplan were ND's coaches expected to come up with to contain THIS OSU TEAM? Did they do things wrong so much -- or was OSU SIMPLY TOO GOOD? I'll go with the LATTER.
What I found particularly telling is that OSU went 5 for 5 in THE RED ZONE; while ND, only 1 for 2.
Actually, I would still argue for calling all of that a MISMATCH in the sense of ND's having GOTTEN BEATEN IN MOST PHASES OF THE GAME, but I'm glad to settle for OVERMATCHED. Because in fact ND was.
ND put up a VALIANT FIGHT, and while NOT HUMBLED, it still lost DECISIVELY.
I was a sprinter and never came in higher than third in a major invitational meet. I just couldn't get to the next gear. That ND team that lost to OSU earlier this week couldn't get to the NEXT GEAR EITHER.
It was simply OVERMATCHED.
Those mistakes and bad plays ND was guilty of? They were the direct result of playing A STRONGER TEAM.
Sometimes, you JUST LOSE.