ADVERTISEMENT

Given how badly our defense was playing,

It was stupid to punt. You have 2 things; 1) one of the worst defenses in CFB 2) One of the best QBs in CFB and the decision is to put the game in the hands of the defense?!?!?
 
It was stupid to punt. You have 2 things; 1) one of the worst defenses in CFB 2) One of the best QBs in CFB and the decision is to put the game in the hands of the defense?!?!?
Kelly was going for the muffed punt play since it works so often. It was on his chart!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Java65 and 88ND
Well, you figure one of these games the defense will be able to make a key stop or create a turnover without a blown coverage, missed tackle, or slip. Even if BK goes for it on 4th down, who knows what play he would have called or what play DK would have called at the LOS. The OL was abused all night except for their pass blocking in the 4th Quarter. There is so much going on here that any decision could have been right or wrong. Let's not forget that his decision to punt was all predicated by a game long under performing OL and a season long failure on defense. A reporter asked BK in his post game if it's getting to the point that DK is going to have to win games and BK had the audacity to get angry at the question like we all live in a cave and didn't see the Stanford, Texas, or MSU games. I don't trust this staff.
 
I would have punted------had 3 TO's.

If you don't make it the game is over as they'll kick a FG and it's now 11.

Had them 3rd and 7 and Luke drifts to the Hash and just leaves a guy wide ass open.

Awful-----that's a 3 year starter who IMO played the worst game Saturday night I ever saw a DB play here which is hard to fathom as he's been a pretty good player for us.
 
I would have gone for it, given how poor our defense is. That said, the reality is his hand was forced when DK took the sack, and except for the blown coverage, we did get them to a third and long, and our most seasoned corner blew his coverage. Tough to really blame the coach there.

Now, earlier in the game DK stretched out and came up less than a yard short of the first down, on that series I definitely would have gone for it then.
 
I would have gone for it, given how poor our defense is. That said, the reality is his hand was forced when DK took the sack, and except for the blown coverage, we did get them to a third and long, and our most seasoned corner blew his coverage. Tough to really blame the coach there.

Now, earlier in the game DK stretched out and came up less than a yard short of the first down, on that series I definitely would have gone for it then.

Hindsight is 20-20, but I agree with the notion that when it was third and two, we should have run the ball -- twice if necessary to pick up two yards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NIN Irish
  • Like
Reactions: NIN Irish
Wasn't that at our own 30 ?
TD, yes it was, but early in the game and less than an yard to go. MSU did it early on at their own 44. I just would have like to have seen us suck it up and play to win the game. I thought punting was a mistake there, I would have gone for it.
 
Big difference between the 30 and the 44 and I can guarantee you Dantonio would have punted in that situation.
 
It's easy to say you would have gone for it, when ND couldn't get a stop and ultimately lost the game. There's plenty of blame to go around here guys. In regard to that particular situation, I didn't have a problem with Kelly punting, but he's an idiot for taking a timeout and then deciding to punt. Lastly, ND defense was in good position to get a stop at 3rd and 6, but Luke(the most experienced DB on his roster) totally forgot how to play zone and cover his man.
 
Kelly made the right choice. 4 and 7 is really tough in that situation.

He got State into a 3rd and 7. ND should've gotten the ball back w a couple of minutes. 3rd and 7.......the D let us down, and couldn't hold.

BK made the right choice.
 
I'm going for it. No doubt. 5 minutes or more I punt. But the funny thing is the defense had them at 3rd and 9. Then a blown coverage cost them. I'm sorry but Kelly shouldn't be blamed for a player not covering a reciever.
 
would anyone else have rolled the dice and gone for it on 4th down and just over 3 minutes to go?
The D play poorly indeed in the first half, as did the O.

When ND was making its comeback the D shut down MSU 4 straight series.

Posting that I do understand the concern, but i believe coach Kelly's thing was they had one more good stand in them..........that is the only conclusion I could think of why it ended the way it did
 
Last edited:
With the athletes at SC, all it takes is the right coach at the right time to turn things around quickly, but hands off Tom Herman. A few of our Irish faithful has him designated as our next HC even though we already have a HC who isn't going anywhere.
 
Kelly made the right choice. 4 and 7 is really tough in that situation.

He got State into a 3rd and 7. ND should've gotten the ball back w a couple of minutes. 3rd and 7.......the D let us down, and couldn't hold.

BK made the right choice.
Kelly made the right choice. 4 and 7 is really tough in that situation.

He got State into a 3rd and 7. ND should've gotten the ball back w a couple of minutes. 3rd and 7.......the D let us down, and couldn't hold.

BK made the right choice.
First off, it was third and 2. It also was 4 down territory under the circumstances.... plus, the D was on the field for 37 minutes for the game. That is not a typo... the proof is in the pudding and what happened shot us out of the playoff hunt....gotta get to 4-2....
Mr Potato head sucks and I believe he has now joined Faust as the only ND HC to open 1-2 3 times. His suckitude knows no bounds....
 
Last edited:
With the athletes at SC, all it takes is the right coach at the right time to turn things around quickly, but hands off Tom Herman. A few of our Irish faithful has him designated as our next HC even though we already have a HC who isn't going anywhere.
We got guys offering to pay his buy-out right now.
 
Do you think Houston boosters have the cabbage to match any offer from SC? I do. I have a feeling with all that money, what Herman wants, Herman gets at Houston.
 
This reminded me of the time CW let the other team score so he could get the ball back for his O. His D was awful (a condemnation of the coaching and not the players) so he had to rely on O.

Same thing here, D was poor and while they had some stops in the second half I had the feeling they wouldn't hold (like Stanford last year).

I would have gone for it.
 
First off, it was third and 2. It also was 4 down territory under the circumstances.... plus, the D was on the field for 37 minutes for tge game. That is not a typo... the proof is in the pudding and what happened shot us out of the playoff hunt....gotta get to 4-2....
Mr Potato head sucks and I believe he has now joined Faust as the only HC to open 1-2 3 times. His suckitude knows no bounds....
Agree---gotta get to 4-2. Then if we beat Stanford and are 5-2......how many people on this board would've taken a 5-2 start? Probably most....
 
Agree---gotta get to 4-2. Then if we beat Stanford and are 5-2......how many people on this board would've taken a 5-2 start? Probably most....
Nope. 6-0.... then the season starts...Porky stinks.... never should have lost to Tx....or msu...out coached both games...he's dumb...
 
Last edited:
I would have gone for it, given how poor our defense is. That said, the reality is his hand was forced when DK took the sack, and except for the blown coverage, we did get them to a third and long, and our most seasoned corner blew his coverage. Tough to really blame the coach there.

Now, earlier in the game DK stretched out and came up less than a yard short of the first down, on that series I definitely would have gone for it then.
They picked on him all game. They obviously seen something in film. Several big plays right at him.

I say again Cole Luke has regressed ...but everyone else has too.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT