"their due" as in respect.....I get that, and I understand they beat UT twice, but not without their starting QB, and Ga's running game last I looked was the 37th worse running attack.
It's true ND hasn't played a better team, but it's also quite possible GA hasn't faced a more determined team than ND is right now.
Losing Mills is huge, but Ga's rushing game has faced a less stellar defense and produced little, So it seems to come down to NDs rushing game vs Ga's rushing defense, and whether ND defense can continue to expose Ga's lack of rushing and putting the game on a QB who's real game time experience minimal.
Kiby Smart is an excellent HC probable the top guy, and makes great second half adjustment and though Freeman has not that pedigree yet has also has adjusted well.
Imo it will be extremely important for ND to score early and often and rattle the young QB all the while keeping Ga's defense on the field do these second half adjustments by Smart will be insurmountable
I understand your usage of the all caps to bring home your point, but my point is this is a different Ga team with little time to work out the kinks in real time playing time, and I believe they caught ND at the wrong time under.
MF has an "it" quality about him now. You can feel it in the press conference, and interviews in a way that feels like he's imposed it on his players.
I'm referring to more than respect when GIVING GEORGIA IT'S DUE. I'm also including its RANK, CAPABILITIES and ABILITY TO WIN THIS GAME. Is it giving Georgia too much credit to suggest it can win? Is it giving ND too little to suggest it can lose? I DON'T THINK SO.
Given the DATA and ANALYTICS, the game is ON PAPER a TOSS-UP. Which to me means that those who are not allowing for a path to victory FOR BOTH TEAMS, are viewing the game as partisans of one side or the other. Which is something I've chosen to avoid. Rooting is one thing; assessment, another. And since I'm niether a PREDICTOR nor a BETTOR, there's NO CONFLICT.
As for Marcus Freeman now having "IT," I have no basis on which to agree OR disagree. Yes, his SIDELINE DEMEANOR HAS CHANGED, even as ND has won 11 in a row. But which is the cause and which, the effect -- I have NO IDEA.
To me, it's like saying someone has "GOOD ENERGY." But if your team can't control the LOS, WHAT'S THAT ENERGY WORTH?
There are SCORES OF SCENARIOS by which either team can win this game. And I'm CREDITING them BOTH with a REASONABLE SHOT.
The payoff for supporters?
WE'LL SEE WHICH TEAM IS BETTER.