Mueller was the lead counsel. However regarding the contents of the report what was refuted?
Well. How about the very origins of this entire investigation.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mueller was the lead counsel. However regarding the contents of the report what was refuted?
Don’t let empirical facts ruin his fake stupid emotional low IQ drivel!Well. How about the very origins of this entire investigation.
YawnHC I assume stands for Hillary Clinton? Remind me again is she president? #deflect
Again, what bombshell are you thinking is going to come out of this 'origin talk'? The facts speaks for themselves and the Trump campaign did some shady, shady stuff. Campaign staffers and affiliates had many direct contacts with the Russian government. Why is your bar set so low man?Well. How about the very origins of this entire investigation.
Today's MSM coverage reminded me of Election night in 2018. Every pundit tripping over each other dicks to deliver their scorching hot take that Dems had a bad day. But after the dusts settles and they replay the key moments of the hearings the media will have to walk this back as well.#deflect
No the FBI and Fusion GPS did some very shady stuffAgain, what bombshell are you thinking is going to come out of this 'origin talk'? The facts speaks for themselves and the Trump campaign did some shady, shady stuff. Campaign staffers and affiliates had many direct contacts with the Russian government. Why is your bar set so low man?
None of the findings needed to be refuted today. Except of course if you mean the conclusion that there was no conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump administration. I'm sure the Dems were hoping that one would be refuted, but it wasn't.What part of the report findings were refuted today?
Lol sure they did so well but lost seats in the Senate.Today's MSM coverage reminded me of Election night in 2018. Every pundit tripping over each other dicks to deliver their scorching hot take that Dems had a bad day. But after the dusts settles and they replay the key moments of the hears the media will have to walk this back as well.
As has oft been repeated, this is the largest Democratic House gain since 1974. It's a larger gain than Democrats had in the wave electionsof both 1982 and 2006.Lol sure they did so well but lost seats in the Senate.
I think you are thinking about the 2016 election pundits tripping over themselves.
And now you have the squad and nothing getting doneAs has oft been repeated, this is the largest Democratic House gain since 1974. It's a larger gain than Democrats had in the wave electionsof both 1982 and 2006.
We can go back even further and see how unusual it is that Democrats picked up this many seats. If you go back all the way to first election of the post-World War II era (1946), there have only been three elections in which Democrats net gained more seats than they did in 2018. Put another way, this was the fourth best performance for Democrats in the 37 general House elections since President Donald Trump was born.
And all they've managed to accomplish is a futile attempt to get Trump out of office and a successful attempt to not fix the immigration debacle. And make no mistake, they do NOT want to fix the immigration problem.As has oft been repeated, this is the largest Democratic House gain since 1974. It's a larger gain than Democrats had in the wave electionsof both 1982 and 2006.
We can go back even further and see how unusual it is that Democrats picked up this many seats. If you go back all the way to first election of the post-World War II era (1946), there have only been three elections in which Democrats net gained more seats than they did in 2018. Put another way, this was the fourth best performance for Democrats in the 37 general House elections since President Donald Trump was born.
#DerpOrangeManBadDerpDon't you think Orange looks pretty ridiculous calling Wikileaks a hoax now? You guys and dis Mueller and his aloofness today, but admit Trump did ZERO to refute how much of a shady mofo he is.
I don’t know how it was ever even a question it was biased. You think he just conveniently ran into 14 other Democrat Trump haters and no Republicans? I mean how stupid does he think we are, You’re going to tell me there wasn’t one Republican out there qualified for the job? Him pretending like there was no bias, and the Republicans constantly calling him out on it during the testimony just made him look like a bumbling fool.That it was wrote by mueller. That it wasn’t biased or rigged.
So....based on that reply your bar is set pretty low then?
Here is the long and short. Trump and his cohorts knew they were doing stuff they shouldn't have been doing. If it wasn't the case they would've said investigate until your blue in the face I have ZERO to hide.
However that is not the case. It was laid out today the people affiliated or part of Trump campaign straight lied to investigators.
True or false?
Regarding your deleting of text messages by FBI agents, where did you hear that one? Can you provide a link?
Actually, you didn't characterize the conclusion correctly. The conclusion was that there was "no evidence" of conspiracy, which is quite different. In fact, Eric Swallwell did a very good job of explaining the problems Mueller had in gathering evidence: wholesale lying by witnesses, destruction of data, encryption, and certain witnesses being subject to attorney/client privilege. The report event said that had the investigation been granted greater cooperation and access, a different conclusion may well have been drawn.None of the findings needed to be refuted today. Except of course if you mean the conclusion that there was no conspiracy between the Russians and the Trump administration. I'm sure the Dems were hoping that one would be refuted, but it wasn''t
Well this is weird...And all they've managed to accomplish is a futile attempt to get Trump out of office and a successful attempt to not fix the immigration debacle. And make no mistake, they do NOT want to fix the immigration problem.
Actually, you didn't characterize the conclusion correctly. The conclusion was that there was "no evidence" of conspiracy, which is quite different. In fact, Eric Swallwell did a very good job of explaining the problems Mueller had in gathering evidence: wholesale lying by witnesses, destruction of data, encryption, and certain witnesses being subject to attorney/client privilege. The report event said that had the investigation been granted greater cooperation and access, a different conclusion may well have been drawn.
Its MIND BOGGLING HOW FRICKING STUPID YOU ARE NITWITIt is MIND BOGGLING not just how Trump got you guys to vote for him, but how you now argue and deflect just like him. I bet you have no collusion, no obstruction tatted on the small of your back?
Mueller's testimony confirmed that Russia committed massive interference in 2016 and they're planning to do it again in 2020. Wikileaks also committed massive interference by publishing thousands of stolen emails. Both Russia and Wikileaks committed these crimes for the purpose of getting Donald Trump elected.
Here's a snippet from today's testimony:
Schiff: During the course of this Russian interference in the election, the Russians made outreach to the Trump campaign, did they not?
Mueller: That occurred. [. . .]
Schiff: The campaign welcomed the Russian help, did they not?
Mueller: We report indications that that occurred, yes. [. . .]
Schiff: The president himself called on the Russians to hack [Hillary Clinton’s] emails?
Mueller: There was a statement by the president on those general lines.
Schiff: Numerous times during the campaign, the president praised the releases of the Russian-hacked emails through WikiLeaks?
Mueller: That did occur. [. . .]
Schiff: Apart from the Russians wanting to help Trump win . . . Donald Trump was trying to make millions from a real estate deal in Moscow?
Mueller: You’re talking about the hotel in Moscow? Yes.
Schiff: When your investigation looked into these matters, numerous Trump associates lied to your team, the grand jury and to Congress?
Mueller: A number of people we interviewed in our investigation, it turns out, did lie. . . .
Schiff: When the president said the Russian interference was a “hoax,” that was false, wasn’t it?
Mueller: True. [. . .]
Schiff: In short, your investigation found evidence that Russia wanted to help Trump win the election, right?
Mueller: I think, generally, that would be accurate. [. . .]
Schiff: Russia committed federal crimes in order to help Donald Trump?
Mueller: You’re talking about the computer crimes charged in our case? Absolutely.
Schiff: Trump campaign officials built their strategy, their messaging strategy, around those stolen documents?
Mueller: Generally, that’s true.
Schiff: And then they lied to cover it up?
Mueller: Generally, that’s true.
I didn't know Tiger Beat had a dating site.Who knew that Anthony Weiner was a member of our message board. How are the accommodations at the half way house?
Stay off the dating sites.
Everything was refuted because it was clearly shown to be a biased investigation. There is absolutely nothing you can stand on in the report even if true because of the complete disgrace they took during the investigation.Mueller was the lead counsel. However regarding the contents of the report what was refuted?
They've been scum a long time. They've just managed to bestow scum thinking upon the likes of Quest, Benko, etc...Here is your answer Quest- Trump is transparent. If he later finds information that questions or disproves his prior statement, here owns up and tells the truth
Name one Dem who has done that?
Pocahontas on her heritage?
Any Dem on their 2 year bs witch hunt that Mueller proved that the Dems were wrong?
Dems lie twist cheat. They have become scum
Why, and provide detailed specificity, does Trump care ?The amount of powerful people with unlimited funds that want this guy dead has to be staggering Trump, Clinton, multiple Intelligence agencies, the Russian Mob and God knows how many billionaires, but still no prayers from LA
Actually, you didn't characterize the conclusion correctly. The conclusion was that there was "no evidence" of conspiracy, which is quite different. In fact, Eric Swallwell did a very good job of explaining the problems Mueller had in gathering evidence: wholesale lying by witnesses, destruction of data, encryption, and certain witnesses being subject to attorney/client privilege. The report event said that had the investigation been granted greater cooperation and access, a different conclusion may well have been drawn.
My response was to TWalsh, who has proven to be an adult in these discussions. Fulminate to those who take you seriously.Do you mean that if Peter Strzok’s phone hadn’t been wiped clean of thousands of texts that a different conclusion would have been reached ?
This was a corrupt investigation from the get go.
The entire investigating team was anti-Trump, that’s undeniable!
Those anti-Trump witnesses who lied were never prosecuted, why was that.
What “access” was Mueller denied ?
“Cooperation” from whom ? Be specific.
What will you say if the IG discovers a concerted effort to nullify Trump by toques within the FBI, including a fabricated FISA court application ?
Cool story.Its MIND BOGGLING HOW FRICKING STUPID YOU ARE NITWIT
When you've got no response...Cool story.
As opposed to such virtuous men like Clinton, JFK, FDR, Weiner, Harvey Weinstein, Johnson, Hart, your favorite Barney Frank, John Edwards.......to name just a few.As this is a public forum hiding your real identities, I fully understand how you could profess your unvarnished loyalty, love for a man like Donald Trump. Republicans love for Donald Trump reminds me of the quote in the movie Usual Suspects. The greatest trick the devil ever pulled off was convincing the world he never existed! Trump and Republicans trying to make Obama illegitimate by birthersism and other techniques was the start of extreme gutter politics. Just when you thought politics couldn't get any worse that same man accepted and encouraged a foreign adversary help to the highest office of the land. ALL Americans should not feel comfortable with this current political culture. If you're not, ask yourself why? There used to be a majority of people who cared about doing things the right way. Now a segment shrugs off a man who is called president but has more failed businesses than successful. A man who has shady finances and refuses to be transparent about them. A man who has at least 5 kids by 3 different woman. A man who when confronted with something he doesn't like calls them fake instead of substantive replies. Republicans will look back and wish they stood up to the man that forever ruined their once proud party.
That was short term fix bill, and it did eventually pass. It was not even remotely a solution to the problem.Well this is weird...
2006 Senate passes Bi-Partisan Immigration Reform bill House Republicans block it.
2013/2014 Senate passes BiPartisan immigration bill House Republicans block it
The irony of Bill Clinton is in response conservative evangelicals defined the idea that there was a minimum moral standard for an individual to be considered president. Bill Clinton did go through an impeachment process for lying about getting a blowjob. Yet now the same evangelicals who made this solemn oath who also sabotaged the campaigns of Dole, McCain, and Romney, embrace a man who has made womanizing his passion in life. Never mind that he attempted to build an empire on gambling.As opposed to such virtuous men like Clinton, JFK, FDR, Weiner, Harvey Weinstein, Johnson, Hart, your favorite Barney Frank, John Edwards.......to name just a few.
Actually, you didn't characterize the conclusion correctly. The conclusion was that there was "no evidence" of conspiracy, which is quite different.
I can live with that......everyone knows he isn’t Saint Trump....but fake virtues of Democrats is laughable. He’s not my President but love how he exposes their hypocrisy!The irony of Bill Clinton is in response conservative evangelicals defined the idea that there was a minimum moral standard for an individual to be considered president. Bill Clinton did go through an impeachment process for lying about getting a blowjob. Yet now the same evangelicals who made this solemn oath who also sabotaged the campaigns of Dole, McCain, and Romney, embrace a man who has made womanizing his passion in life. Never mind that he attempted to build an empire on gambling.
Just as The Tea Party movement was never about deficit reduction I make the same statement about evangelicals. Morality was never really that important. All that stuff spouted in church was all fake. When someone tries to give me that old time religion I just start laughing at them.
On the record I'm a Buckley Republican leaning towards libertarian.