I'm writing this post on my phone and using voice transcription so I apologize for lack of punctuation but I think the point will come through anyway
I think a lot of coaches have success with a previous regimes roster or culture or both but as the new coach gets further and further away from the old roster/system in place by the previous coach the new coach can start to show some cracks.
All of the data has been great and moving upwards in relation to Marcus Freeman's quality as a head coach (And I'm personally a big fan of the player development that he's been responsible for) so this isn't a criticism but maybe asking the community to tap the brake a little bit and be more cautiously optimistic than 100% convinced because MF still has a lot to prove
I think a lot of coaches have success with a previous regimes roster or culture or both but as the new coach gets further and further away from the old roster/system in place by the previous coach the new coach can start to show some cracks.
All of the data has been great and moving upwards in relation to Marcus Freeman's quality as a head coach (And I'm personally a big fan of the player development that he's been responsible for) so this isn't a criticism but maybe asking the community to tap the brake a little bit and be more cautiously optimistic than 100% convinced because MF still has a lot to prove
Last edited: