this just shows how stupid you are when it comes to any knowledge of the game whatsoever. i nominate that as the "most stupid post in message board history ". a new low, even for you.
Where does kelly's record rank historically at ND?
- Thread starter cgvr
- Start date
Yep, kelly is at a terrible disadvantage when it come to the college football landscape. Let's discuss a few of them.
The following is not meant to be all inclusive. For starters, there's no advantage to our players being on national television weekly for 4 years. What other school can say that? There's no advantage to being the best known catholic university in the world. Our facilities are superior and being upgraded. There's no advantage to us being # 1 in placing players in the NFL. There's no advantage to being in the top 10 for current NFL players. There's no advantage to us having the most members in the NFL Hall of Fame. We are tied with players, but DeBartolo puts us at 13. There's no advantage to us having the second most NFL pro bowlers. There's no advantage to having the most Heisman's. There's no advantage to being co-ed and having an all girls school up the road. Our national championship record and tradition speaks for itself. Our commitment to off field academic excellence is an advantage.
Our biggest disadvantage is having a head coach that is basically a zero when it comes to personality and someone who can't cut it on the field. In addition, recruits know he is someone that lacks loyalty and openly lies. His behavior has been lambasted/vilified by many media sources and there are plenty of recruits/parents/families that are turned off by him. He has been involved in scandalous/ignorant behavior since his days at cmu. In addition, we have had scandal after scandal under his watch. His behavior, that behavior and our inability to deliver consistent winning big game performances are examples of detriments/hindrances to our recruiting. Fortunately, the historic long term Notre Dame tradition/reputation of excellence can overcome plenty of warts.
You are so far over your skis about DII and lower tier coaching as validation it's laughable. Your admitting to taking 'roids while in school tells me all I need to know about your integrity, moral compass and sportsmanship. Talk about "stupid".....
Last edited:
that list of yours is amusing i'll give you that. that said there are a handful on there that i think are better coaches than kelly. not sure anyone of them though are a better fit given the program parameters at notre dame.
Hilarious comedy bits at this point. Not worth responding to other than to reply so everyone can get a good look at either the stupidity or hilarity in your viewpoint.
wow, citing my experimenting with the juice is the best you can come up with ? your continued uneducated assault on the lower divisions of college football just further illustrates your ignorance. your one man crusade is much like vaudeville......dead.
Never did it during the season. I did experiment with it in the winter and spring of 88-89. Nice try though.
Got it. You believe off season cheating is okay....
Again, "What you call "experimenting" most call cheating...... well done...."
In other words, what I have written is irrefutable and you have no cogent reply.
"Fact of the matter is bk is the best coach at ND since holtz by about any measure."
What a yardstick....
If you disagree with him I will wait for your rebuttle. Leave the name calling at the door.
Where does kelly's record rank historically at ND?
Looks like # 67 and # 83 worst 5 year averages to me....
http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/active/n/notre_dame/best_5_years.php
I do like the fact each and every year coach Kelly has implemented more of the running game. I think the back field this season can carry the team if the online stays healthy
Similar threads
