If SC win the PAC 12 Championship That would be a nice notch to have beaten the PAC 12 champ in the voters eyes???????maybe?
Stanford may be going down tonight
- Thread starter beachcardinal
- Start date
If SC win the PAC 12 Championship That would be a nice notch to have beaten the PAC 12 champ in the voters eyes???????maybe?
Yes, why are you telling me that? We're talking about Stanford who plays in the Pac 12 North along with Oregon.
I'm simply stating if SC wins the PAC 12 championship (since Utah lost that open the door for SC to be in the mix) It would be somewhat of a notch. At this point beating a PAC 12 team not in contention for anything does little but SOS
Stanford beats Cal next week and they are in the Pac12 champ game. UOJ prob loses to UCLA. So ND beats Stanford and they will most likely have beaten the conf champ.
11-1 ND is in.
11-1 ND is in.
Are you assuming no undefeated B12 conference champ remains? Still need help in Oklahoma. If ok st is undefeated they are in, not likely but possible
At 11-1 ND common sense speaking should go before any 1 loss team provided Clemson runs the table. ND has far and away the,"best loss" of any once beaten team and that includes Bammer who has a bad loss at home to a 3 loss Ole,Miss team.
DIP the tactic you unsuccessfully tried to use was this...
Changing the subject: debater is losing so he tries to redirect the attention to another subject area (ND Red Zone Offense, Glass House/Bricks nursery school analogy and mention of military service)
Where he thinks he can look better relative to the person he is debating, but admits to no change of subject and pretends to be refuting the original subject topic. Which was... "Stanford may be going down tonight". And they did.
Changing the subject: debater is losing so he tries to redirect the attention to another subject area (ND Red Zone Offense, Glass House/Bricks nursery school analogy and mention of military service)
Where he thinks he can look better relative to the person he is debating, but admits to no change of subject and pretends to be refuting the original subject topic. Which was... "Stanford may be going down tonight". And they did.
I have a suspicion that this is true as well, which is unfortunate to see how weak some of the B12 teams are and their lousy schedules.
Silly goose.
I've stated if your point was Stanford list because of bad RZ play then OK. I concur
All I said was becareful considering ND RZ woes are "statistically worse" than Stanford.
Nothing more nothing less.
I should "be careful" about my critique of Stanford.. Really? If you tell someone to be careful they are usually doing something dangerous. What was so dangerous about my comments?
That's the first statement you made that I agree with. You are very dramatic in your defense of Stanford football and the imaginary attack that never happened.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Basketball MBB: Game Thread | NC State 66, Notre Dame 65 FINAL- Latest: Eric Hansen
-