ADVERTISEMENT

So Lincoln Cryley wants to drop Notre Dame

deadirishpoet

All Star
Jun 1, 2003
25,587
5,138
113
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Colombia2003
The thing is I don't think scheduling patsies helps you in this new era. You want an easy conference schedule....so you can play in or win your conference Championship game but if you are not playing in your conference Championship game you need to have played decent competition and won to make it. I.E. Miami being out etc.
 
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
I very much doubt that Lincoln Riley has much say in the matter.
 
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
His reasoning sucks, and his disregard for this great longstanding rivalry game is worse. That said, I do think it’s going to be increasingly more challenging for ND to schedule USC and other major conference games after the start of their conference games. I keep thinking the Big and the SEC are going to play their eight conference games after three non conference games, and ND will be forced to schedule marque opponents early in the season, etc… Hope not, as I love rivalry weekend following Thanksgiving, and watching ND/USC.
 
The thing is I don't think scheduling patsies helps you in this new era. You want an easy conference schedule....so you can play in or win your conference Championship game but if you are not playing in your conference Championship game you need to have played decent competition and won to make it. I.E. Miami being out etc.
Only if you’re not in the Big or SEC.
 
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
Brought this topic up back in September. It's going to happen IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelso86
This is why I firmly believe ND needs to schedule an FCS team for their 12th game next season. They have more than enough quality on there and now that Barry Odom is at Purdue that won't be an easy game anymore. You can't be a traditionalist anymore and expect to come out on top. As much as the ND/SC game is a huge game this is one of many "traditions" I think is going by the wayside.
 
That's a bad look for LR, real bad. Those two pick sixes and another loss to ND are not what kept them out of the playoffs. USC going 6-6 is what kept them out. And who the hell is this hillbilly boy coach, who truly has no deep investment in USC football at all, and has done the program no favors with these underachieving seasons for being such a hotshot coach of his generation, to try and engineer and lobby for the ending of maybe the most prestigious, and venerable rivalry in CFB. To make things easier on him, it is fair to say.

Hopefully, presumably, this gets shot down, and I don't even know how much longer he's even go to last at SC. Though he probably has some massive, ridiculous buyout.
 
This is why I firmly believe ND needs to schedule an FCS team for their 12th game next season. They have more than enough quality on there and now that Barry Odom is at Purdue that won't be an easy game anymore. You can't be a traditionalist anymore and expect to come out on top. As much as the ND/SC game is a huge game this is one of many "traditions" I think is going by the wayside.
Just don’t reschedule NIU!
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
This is why I firmly believe ND needs to schedule an FCS team for their 12th game next season. They have more than enough quality on there and now that Barry Odom is at Purdue that won't be an easy game anymore. You can't be a traditionalist anymore and expect to come out on top. As much as the ND/SC game is a huge game this is one of many "traditions" I think is going by the wayside.
Bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDinNJ
His reasoning sucks, and his disregard for this great longstanding rivalry game is worse. That said, I do think it’s going to be increasingly more challenging for ND to schedule USC and other major conference games after the start of their conference games. I keep thinking the Big and the SEC are going to play their eight conference games after three non conference games, and ND will be forced to schedule marque opponents early in the season, etc… Hope not, as I love rivalry weekend following Thanksgiving, and watching ND/USC.
That's great take on it
 
Brought this topic up back in September. It's going to happen IMO.
Which?
Notre Dame in conference, or SC dropping Notre Dame?
I can't imagine the powers that be want to tear down traditions to meet their so called hopes and dreams.
I mean we listen to them all the time talking about how much they care about college football. Something like that would fly in the face of they say they believe in
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDSMC78
That group also was corrupt. And that’s why Pete Carroll got out of Dodge to Seattle.
They were just way ahead of their time. Same with SMU. The SMU program got the death penalty for what is essentially allowed today.
 
They were just way ahead of their time. Same with SMU. The SMU program got the death penalty for what is essentially allowed today.
Both USC and SMU got what they deserved, and I am proud of the fact that, at least IMO, Notre Dame wasn’t on that path.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDinNJ
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
Yea. We kept him out of the playoffs. When you suck, it doesn’t matter who you play
 
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
USC won’t allow the annual series to end, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDinNJ
All these things are noise as college football fast changes. NIL, transfers, and realignment have nailed the coffin of tradition. We're way past the point of pretending it's not about money.

Notre Dame will find a way for a competitive schedule. And to stay confident. Again, the irony is the new conditions better distribute talent...with ND being able to leverage brand, money, and stability. Blue blood advantages.

The distribution factor might near equalize the academic path factor. Ohio State, Alabama, and Georgia might not be able to stack monster teams anymore. More parity. Notre Dame and, theoretically, Stanford can field NC aspiring teams.

Qualification and selection will evolve too. It will never be perfect. But reasonable...punishing egregious gaming of scheduling. You won't get in winning vs cupcakes.
 
All these things are noise as college football fast changes. NIL, transfers, and realignment have nailed the coffin of tradition. We're way past the point of pretending it's not about money.

Notre Dame will find a way for a competitive schedule. And to stay confident. Again, the irony is the new conditions better distribute talent...with ND being able to leverage brand, money, and stability. Blue blood advantages.

The distribution factor might near equalize the academic path factor. Ohio State, Alabama, and Georgia might not be able to stack monster teams anymore. More parity. Notre Dame and, theoretically, Stanford can field NC aspiring teams.

Qualification and selection will evolve too. It will never be perfect. But reasonable...punishing egregious gaming of scheduling. You won't get in winning vs cupcakes.
Largely accurate imo, but a bit more cynical than me. I don’t agree re all these changes having nailed the coffin of tradition, at least not for ND traditions. I think ND and USC will continue their annual rivalry game, just as I think we will play Navy every year. Timing of the USC game might change for sure. But there has clearly been a significant wipe out of other traditional rivalry games for teams that have changed conferences, for more Money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: banmate6
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
The fans of SC, the AD AND Board of directors would kill him.
 
Which?
Notre Dame in conference, or SC dropping Notre Dame?
I can't imagine the powers that be want to tear down traditions to meet their so called hopes and dreams.
I mean we listen to them all the time talking about how much they care about college football. Something like that would fly in the face of they say they believe in
SC Dropping ND
 
The fact that this subject has been addressed on numerous threads since the summer gives it legs. TAM and Texas stopped playing in 2011 due to expansion. ND and Miami played almost yearly until Miami joined the ACC. The Kansas–Missouri football series is the second-oldest and second-most-played rivalry in college football history. Stopped playing in 2012. BYU and Utah played yearly until Utah joined the PAC 12 since then it's been interrupted numerous times.. Okie St and OU as well. In addition, USC used to have ND on future schedules for 4-5 years into the future. After 2026 ND is no longer listed. Same with Stanford. Now they are no longer listed and the 2 are not playing next year. Oklahoma and Nebraska. CU and Nebraska. All traditional yearly rivalries, gone by the wayside.
 
Last edited:
Both USC and SMU got what they deserved, and I am proud of the fact that, at least IMO, Notre Dame wasn’t on that path.
Lol you were slobbering over Pete in a thread you created on this board. You can stop the act. You outed yourself as a USC fan sport.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irishjohn68
USC is not dropping ND. The powers at USC will not let that happen. The only way USC can sell out the Colosseum is to bring ND to town.
 
Largely accurate imo, but a bit more cynical than me. I don’t agree re all these changes having nailed the coffin of tradition, at least not for ND traditions. I think ND and USC will continue their annual rivalry game, just as I think we will play Navy every year. Timing of the USC game might change for sure. But there has clearly been a significant wipe out of other traditional rivalry games for teams that have changed conferences, for more Money.


I hope you are right. I agree Navy and Army will find a way. Some tradition will be preserved.

But most schools might never again have a true student-athlete ideal. Most athletes will take the low academic path. Uncompromising schools like Notre Dame, Stanford, and Duke will challenge a majority opting for money and results.

But if Notre Dame and Stanford win, I doubt it changes the latter. Again, I hope to be so wrong about this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Telx1
They were just way ahead of their time. Same with SMU. The SMU program got the death penalty for what is essentially allowed today.
A head of their time?
No they were cheating, and even all the unstabilizing that's allowed now there is still programs tampering outside the lines through agents which is unethical at the least and probably illegal, and yet no officals are calling this out publicly
 
Last edited:
A head of their time?
No they were cheating, and even all the unstadilizing that's allowed now their are still programs tampering outside the lines through agents which is unethical at the least and probably illegal, and yet no officals are calling thus out publicly
My point is what was cheating back then is pretty much allowed and accepted today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
The fact that this subject has been addressed on numerous threads since the summer gives it legs. TAM and Texas stopped playing in 2011 due to expansion. ND and Miami played almost yearly until Miami joined the ACC. The Kansas–Missouri football series is the second-oldest and second-most-played rivalry in college football history. Stopped playing in 2012. BYU and Utah played yearly until Utah joined the PAC 12. Okie St and OU as well. In addition, USC used to have ND on future schedules for 4-5 years into the future. After 2026 ND is no longer listed. Same with Stanford. Now they are no longer listed and the 2 are not playing next year. Oklahoma and Nebraska. CU and Nebraska. All traditional yearly rivalries, gone by the wayside.
"ND and Miami played almost yearly until Miami joined the ACC"

No -- that series was stopped after the 1990 game to due to the intensity of the rivalry (think '88 and '89) -- had nothing to do with Miami and the ACC (which BTW, did not occur until 2004).
 
"ND and Miami played almost yearly until Miami joined the ACC"

No -- that series was stopped after the 1990 game to due to the intensity of the rivalry (think '88 and '89) -- had nothing to do with Miami and the ACC (which BTW, did not occur until 2004).
Okay so you found one. And now that Miami is in the ACC, they play but won't play regularly.
 
Okay so you found one. And now that Miami is in the ACC, they play but won't play regularly.
Well now there's Michigan who made football possible at ND and stopped due to the hurt feelings they've built up because Notre Dame wanted to have it's own identity, and let's be clear Michigan to this moment would do anything it takes to hurt that identity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kelso86
A head of their time?
No they were cheating, and even all the unstabilizing that's allowed now there is still programs tampering outside the lines through agents which is unethical at the least and probably illegal, and yet no officals are calling this out publicly
Cheating their collective asses off.

And you are correct, nothing has changed...........
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
And on top of that schedule a lesser opponent.
Who does this cat think hd is Nick Saban?
He's out of his depth.

"USC head coach Lincoln Riley has said that he would consider dropping the annual Notre Dame-USC football game if it would help the Trojans win a national championsh"
He is a flash in the pan.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT