Romeo
- Thread starter Pennick4
- Start date
agreed. one thing some forget is this is russells first year in vangorders system. redfield clearly blew a coverage yesterday on the td to boyd.
Yes he started in 2012 but he does not lose a year of eligibility in 2014 when he sat out the entire year. The five years to play four still works for him even while academically ineligible.
Everett Golson lost a year of eligibility when he set out for academic violations. Just assuming the same would be true for Russell
What's with the rude response? Then why the **** are you asking this simple question?
You get five years to play four. Golson saved a year in 2011. He didn't in 2013 because of the 5 to play 4 rule. Russell hadn't sat out a year until 2014 so was able to preserve a year of eligibility in that year. The reason for missing a year doesn't matter in regards to being allowed a fifth year.
Punk.
Are you sure of this 44? I thought if it were an "academic impropriety" that caused the loss of a year the player could not get that year back. Not flaming, just curious.
I'm not certain, but I don't see why not. It seems unfair to give Golson a 5th and not Russell simply because Golson had already sat out a year, ya know?
I also don't know if the school discloses that sort of thing to the NCAA.
Wow! Calm down, key board killer. I was taking a shot at myself with my "duh" comment.
So you don't really know? Cause the way your posting and attacking me (when I clearly was taking a shot at myself) one would think you actually knew the facts here.
It's ok. Thanks though. I'm just glad you read my explanation because I truely wasn't taking a shot at you.
We're all good now, but I wasn't going to say with absolute certainty about the rule because I don't pretend those sorts of things. I'm very confident though.
It definitely wasn't clear to be you were making fun of yourself. Sorry again.
