if you're talking redfield I hope he doesn't play.ugh.
I think Pazu is really Sark. He goes off on tangents when drunk and apologizes afterwards.
He needs to get to an AA meeting, pronto ! Turnovermachine can be his sponsor.
There is no BCS and the polls no longer count for anything.Well, we would have to use the Coaches Poll since it is one of the polls used in the BCS calculations. In the coaches poll, Michigan is behind ND. So if Michigan beats MSU, Michigan jumps us and MSU may still be ranked ahead if the game is close so we would get hit with a double whammy.
You guys may take Kelly off our hands. Bruce Feldman thinks USC will hire Kelly or Mora.please beat us ... we want our lousy lazy drunk coach fired 1st ! next year we will beat you and you can fire your coach ! deal ?
The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?The polls don't count any more. After the first committee ranking, the polls will rearrange themselves to reflect the committee's view.
With amazing dexterity.How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?
they aren t behind them in both polls. the only rankings that matter are the committees. the losers of fla-lsu, mich -mich st.and a&m -bama will all likely be behind nd if they win. natural attrition will occur. nd needs to win out and if they do they'll be smack dab in the middle of it. wouldn't hurt to have Clemson at no more than one loss.The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?If you consider an 8-5 record each year is winning. 2012 was an aberration. really easy schedule and some lucky bounces. We lost at Pitt. Then had our ass handed to us by Bama because Kelly was too busy interviewing with the Eagles to prepare the team. The only decent team we played was OU and they were a marginal top 20 team. If you want to hang your hat on one lucky season, then the more power to you. You are the same guy that argued with me that 1 loss would not prevent us from getting to the playoffs this season. How is that working out? I was right about that and I have been right about Kelly. 6 years of mediocrity where he single-handedly blows at least one game a year with his bad decisions. Maybe he wins 9 games this year with a Div III like schedule and his "best team ever".
now, now no fair bringing facts and logic into the discussion.Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?
Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.
RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0
The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?
Paz, If we win out and end up 11-1 and out of the playoffs, will you and all the Kelly bashers be on this site talking about how Kelly blew the Clemson game? My guess is yes and that says more about you than the people that defend him. I like Kelly. I will root for him as long as he's the coach. Win or lose.
And Kelly didn't lose the Clemson game. 4 TOs and at least 5 dropped passes including a 2pt conversion that would have won us the game, lost us the Clemson game.
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?
Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.
RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?
Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.
RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0
I am not quite sure what your argument is. First off, this is ESPN Power Index and it is based on projections. How can a fact be established through a subjective index and projections?
You do know that there is NO MORE BCS anymore? I'm trying to figure out why you keep referring to it. Both Coach's and AP have no bearing on the rankings other than some arbitrary influence for the lazy ones on the committee who might not do their own due diligence.Well, we would have to use the Coaches Poll since it is one of the polls used in the BCS calculations. In the coaches poll, Michigan is behind ND. So if Michigan beats MSU, Michigan jumps us and MSU may still be ranked ahead if the game is close so we would get hit with a double whammy.
You do know that there is NO MORE BCS anymore? I'm trying to figure out why you keep referring to it. Both Coach's and AP have no bearing on the rankings other than some arbitrary influence for the lazy ones on the committee who might not do their own due diligence.
I am not constantly referring to it. I used the coaches poll because it used to be factored in the BCS formula instead of the AP poll. Echo said we would jump Michigan or MSU because Michigan and MSU have to play one another. Michigan is ranked below us in the coaches poll so how do we jump someone who is already behind us if they lose?You do know that there is NO MORE BCS anymore? I'm trying to figure out why you keep referring to it. Both Coach's and AP have no bearing on the rankings other than some arbitrary influence for the lazy ones on the committee who might not do their own due diligence.
Now that is a positive to look at things. All of 191 posts and you are going to the way back machine with Fat Charlie?and we lose to Pitt and/or Stanford, should Kelly stay?
I use the AP poll. Michigan is ahead of notre dame. neither poll is now being used.I am not constantly referring to it. I used the coaches poll because it used to be factored in the BCS formula instead of the AP poll. Echo said we would jump Michigan or MSU because Michigan and MSU have to play one another. Michigan is ranked below us in the coaches poll so how do we jump someone who is already behind us if they lose?
78 -We are 5-1, DBag. We lost to a top 5 team by two points at their place. Fans like you are impossible to satisfy.
102 replies to a notion that was a bad idea from the start.
Perse, is this Continual above with a new username? Did he get banned again?Another ID with a foul origin! just bad genetics!
I have two pages of ignore lists and your fam of ID's are a full page.
Dispicable you! feel free to cut your fingers off! it would benefit this forum to no end!
You and yours have been the cancer on this board from the day you came along trying to censure and stiffle
(and best I can determine you have only been able to intimidate 1 poster)
Well, this clown uses the D Bag word which is the signature phrase of ContineallyIrish35 and KellyIrish35. So I guess he has 3 aliases now.no, he/she/they have more ID's than argie! they try to present the idea they have a following!
I guess if one has had a lobotomy or is a coward, that's someone that could follow them.
Because, as you have pointed out also, anyone who is not a Kelly fan to the Pro Kelly Supporters are not ND fans. In fact, they are trolls. So, the reverse argument can also be made. Any Kelly fans who are satisfied with an 8-5 record and the coach blowing at least 1 game a year with his decision making can be accused of non being ND football fans.he has many more than that!
and they go back a few years; to be precise!
Paz:
your topic here deserves a comment. Why address posters as Kelly fans or Critics, instead of addressing ND fans.
I am a ND fan; before and after Kelly. Kelly is the current HC. If he wins, I would think a ND fan would be fine with that! If he does not win then he should not stay on as head coach. Root for ND - not for or against the coach.
St Cecilia -- you are making objective football sense -- be careful. There are trolls everywhere led by purse + cvgr that want to take down anyone who supports coach Kelly - please be careful .Paz, If we win out and end up 11-1 and out of the playoffs, will you and all the Kelly bashers be on this site talking about how Kelly blew the Clemson game? My guess is yes and that says more about you than the people that defend him. I like Kelly. I will root for him as long as he's the coach. Win or lose.
And Kelly didn't lose the Clemson game. 4 TOs and at least 5 dropped passes including a 2pt conversion that would have won us the game, lost us the Clemson game.
he has many more than that!
and they go back a few years; to be precise!
Paz:
your topic here deserves a comment. Why address posters as Kelly fans or Critics, instead of addressing ND fans.
I am a ND fan; before and after Kelly. Kelly is the current HC. If he wins, I would think a ND fan would be fine with that! If he does not win then he should not stay on as head coach. Root for ND - not for or against the coach.
Because, as you have pointed out also, anyone who is not a Kelly fan to the Pro Kelly Supporters are not ND fans. In fact, they are trolls. So, the reverse argument can also be made. Any Kelly fans who are satisfied with an 8-5 record and the coach blowing at least 1 game a year with his decision making can be accused of non being ND football fans.
Go away. You offer nothing.Stop the hair pulling. Enough of this nonsense.
IrishKelly35, Continual, Irishkelly351...what's up with all the aliases? You are the new Argus.hypocritical phony swine
Another ID with a foul origin! just bad genetics!
I have two pages of ignore lists and your fam of ID's are a full page.
Dispicable you! feel free to cut your fingers off! it would benefit this forum to no end!
You and yours have been the cancer on this board from the day you came along trying to censure and stiffle
(and best I can determine you have only been able to intimidate 1 poster)
What a sick puppy Purse is. Hoping someone cuts their own fingers off --- Is Purse with ISIS.
Someone who has two pages of posters on a ignore list takes this forum too seriously.
Maybe Purse needs to take a week or two off to mellow out a little. Maybe lrish35 will get out of your head.