ADVERTISEMENT

Question for Everyone (Kelly Suppporters and Critics)... If USC blows us out at home

if you're talking redfield I hope he doesn't play.ugh.

He's the best in the country at over pursuing. "Max, do you see those guys in the different colored uniforms...... Don't let any of them behind you...."
I think he thinks he is playing LB sometimes......
Shumate has emerged nicely....
 
I think Pazu is really Sark. He goes off on tangents when drunk and apologizes afterwards.
He needs to get to an AA meeting, pronto ! Turnovermachine can be his sponsor.

I think pazu should be up for poster "rookie of the year". He is classic. We should have a kangaroo court like the Yankees used to do and vote on stuff.

One year they were trying to figure out who the dumbest Yankee was....it came down to Mickey Rivers and Lou Pinella. Anyway, they had to argue it out in front of the team. Rivers earned the title when Pinella told him he was so stupid he couldn't spell IQ.

You better be careful because kellyirish35 is in your space. I would still give you my "ND Homer Heisman" vote. Heck, I just made it up so.the award is yours to keep unless we find some violations.

Congrats to Bodi as the inaugural "ND Homer Heisman" winner....

Speech!!!! (Covering why ND will win out and be in the playoff while thanking your friends and family would be a nice touch)
 
The OP is idiotic but I agree that running into Clemson's 7-8 man fronts all night was not smart. In that particular game, it was a waste of a down.
 
Well, we would have to use the Coaches Poll since it is one of the polls used in the BCS calculations. In the coaches poll, Michigan is behind ND. So if Michigan beats MSU, Michigan jumps us and MSU may still be ranked ahead if the game is close so we would get hit with a double whammy.
There is no BCS and the polls no longer count for anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: echowaker
The polls don't count any more. After the first committee ranking, the polls will rearrange themselves to reflect the committee's view.
The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?
 
The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?
they aren t behind them in both polls. the only rankings that matter are the committees. the losers of fla-lsu, mich -mich st.and a&m -bama will all likely be behind nd if they win. natural attrition will occur. nd needs to win out and if they do they'll be smack dab in the middle of it. wouldn't hurt to have Clemson at no more than one loss.
 
If you consider an 8-5 record each year is winning. 2012 was an aberration. really easy schedule and some lucky bounces. We lost at Pitt. Then had our ass handed to us by Bama because Kelly was too busy interviewing with the Eagles to prepare the team. The only decent team we played was OU and they were a marginal top 20 team. If you want to hang your hat on one lucky season, then the more power to you. You are the same guy that argued with me that 1 loss would not prevent us from getting to the playoffs this season. How is that working out? I was right about that and I have been right about Kelly. 6 years of mediocrity where he single-handedly blows at least one game a year with his bad decisions. Maybe he wins 9 games this year with a Div III like schedule and his "best team ever".
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?

Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.

RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0
 
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?

Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.

RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0
now, now no fair bringing facts and logic into the discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pennick4
The point was, Echo said that we would jump either Michigan or MSU depending on the loser of the game. How do we jump someone that is ranked behind us (Michigan)?

You could theoretically jump us in the AP poll. But we ain't losin' this week.
 
Paz, If we win out and end up 11-1 and out of the playoffs, will you and all the Kelly bashers be on this site talking about how Kelly blew the Clemson game? My guess is yes and that says more about you than the people that defend him. I like Kelly. I will root for him as long as he's the coach. Win or lose.
And Kelly didn't lose the Clemson game. 4 TOs and at least 5 dropped passes including a 2pt conversion that would have won us the game, lost us the Clemson game.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: no1e
Paz, If we win out and end up 11-1 and out of the playoffs, will you and all the Kelly bashers be on this site talking about how Kelly blew the Clemson game? My guess is yes and that says more about you than the people that defend him. I like Kelly. I will root for him as long as he's the coach. Win or lose.
And Kelly didn't lose the Clemson game. 4 TOs and at least 5 dropped passes including a 2pt conversion that would have won us the game, lost us the Clemson game.

kelly shares responsibility in the clemson loss. He admitted as such.....
Who cares who you will root for win or lose? When Billy Martin was winning everything with the Yankees there were plenty of lifelong Yankee fans that couldn't stand the man.... The same can be said for many ND fans, alumni, others.... about kelly....
This season is teetering and pounding southern cal into submission is all that matters. People, you included, should respect others that don't share your opinion about kelly......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pazuzu
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?

Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.

RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0

I am not quite sure what your argument is. First off, this is ESPN Power Index and it is based on projections. How can a fact be established through a subjective index and projections?
 
Where did you get that information? Just dreamed it up, didn't you?

Here's what is on ESPN. See, these things are facts, not your opinion.

RK TEAM W-L PROJ W-L WIN OUT% CONF WIN% REM SOS RK FPI
1 Baylor, Big 12 5-0 10.9 - 1.1 26.7 54.1 10 29.2
2 TCU, Big 12 6-0 10.5 - 1.5 13.2 35.0 35 24.4
3 Alabama, SEC 5-1 9.4 - 2.7 8.1 9.1 13 23.7
4 Ole Miss, SEC 5-1 9.6 - 2.7 9.4 20.6 3 22.9
5 USC, Pac-12 3-2 8.4 - 3.9 7.5 20.3 7 22.8
6 Texas A&M, SEC 5-0 10.2 - 2.1 3.5 17.2 38 21.4
7 LSU, SEC 5-0 8.6 - 2.7 1.2 11.5 1 20.7
8 Notre Dame, FBS Indep. 5-1 9.3 - 2.7 11.1 -- 28 20.5
9 OSU, Big Ten 6-0 11.2 - 1.3 17.3 37.1 51 20.5
10 Clemson, ACC 5-0 11.2 - 1.5 16.1 49.2 57 19.6
11 Oklahoma, Big 12 4-1 8.5 - 3.5 1.9 3.3 33 19.6
12 Georgia, SEC 4-2 8.5 - 3.7 8.5 8.2 34 19.2
13 Florida, SEC 6-0 10.5 - 2.2 3.7 32.0 36 19.2
14 Stanford, Pac-12 4-1 9.8 - 3.1 7.2 47.5 24 18.9
15 Michigan, Big Ten 5-1 9.9 - 2.5 12.6 30.3 44 18.5
16 Tennessee, SEC 3-3 7.6 - 4.4 11.8 1.3 62 18.1
17 Boise State, MW 5-1 11.4 - 1.5 59.3 80.3 103 17.3
18 UCLA, Pac-12 4-1 8.6 - 3.6 1.1 6.2 42 17.1
19 FSU, ACC 5-0 9.7 - 2.6 1.5 18.8 46 16.3
20 Utah, Pac-12 5-0 9.8 - 2.7 1.2 19.1 41 16.0

I am not quite sure what your argument is. First off, this is ESPN Power Index and it is based on projections. How can a fact be established through a subjective index and projections?
 
I am not quite sure what your argument is. First off, this is ESPN Power Index and it is based on projections. How can a fact be established through a subjective index and projections?

Notre Dame is a 22-1 longshot to win the BCS Title this year. There are close to a dozen teams ahead of us and a few tied. That's a large mountain to climb. imo We not only have to be flawless, but get style points for domination....
southern cal would be an excellent start..... clemson really put us in a hole.....dammit.

http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/odds/futures/

"What is Longshot?
A longshot is an extreme underdog. In this case, an extreme underdog is a team or competitor which no one believes can win the game or even get close to covering the spread. For example, a team with 20:1 odds to win a game would be considered a longshot."

http://www.sportingcharts.com/dictionary/sports-betting/longshot.aspx

PS The current polls and vegas odds are among the best barometers at this stage.... Our schedule needs to strengthen some how....that'd help too...
 
Well, we would have to use the Coaches Poll since it is one of the polls used in the BCS calculations. In the coaches poll, Michigan is behind ND. So if Michigan beats MSU, Michigan jumps us and MSU may still be ranked ahead if the game is close so we would get hit with a double whammy.
You do know that there is NO MORE BCS anymore? I'm trying to figure out why you keep referring to it. Both Coach's and AP have no bearing on the rankings other than some arbitrary influence for the lazy ones on the committee who might not do their own due diligence.
 
You do know that there is NO MORE BCS anymore? I'm trying to figure out why you keep referring to it. Both Coach's and AP have no bearing on the rankings other than some arbitrary influence for the lazy ones on the committee who might not do their own due diligence.
I am not constantly referring to it. I used the coaches poll because it used to be factored in the BCS formula instead of the AP poll. Echo said we would jump Michigan or MSU because Michigan and MSU have to play one another. Michigan is ranked below us in the coaches poll so how do we jump someone who is already behind us if they lose?
 
I am not constantly referring to it. I used the coaches poll because it used to be factored in the BCS formula instead of the AP poll. Echo said we would jump Michigan or MSU because Michigan and MSU have to play one another. Michigan is ranked below us in the coaches poll so how do we jump someone who is already behind us if they lose?
I use the AP poll. Michigan is ahead of notre dame. neither poll is now being used.
 
We are 5-1, DBag. We lost to a top 5 team by two points at their place. Fans like you are impossible to satisfy.
78 -

Why would you refer to him as a fan ? I address that to you because I would cut my fingers cut off before communicating w that D Bag
 
Another ID with a foul origin! just bad genetics!

I have two pages of ignore lists and your fam of ID's are a full page.

Dispicable you! feel free to cut your fingers off! it would benefit this forum to no end!

You and yours have been the cancer on this board from the day you came along trying to censure and stiffle
(and best I can determine you have only been able to intimidate 1 poster)

xCartoons-Shouting-Match.jpg
 
Last edited:
102 replies to a notion that was a bad idea from the start.
Another ID with a foul origin! just bad genetics!

I have two pages of ignore lists and your fam of ID's are a full page.

Dispicable you! feel free to cut your fingers off! it would benefit this forum to no end!

You and yours have been the cancer on this board from the day you came along trying to censure and stiffle
(and best I can determine you have only been able to intimidate 1 poster)

xCartoons-Shouting-Match.jpg
Perse, is this Continual above with a new username? Did he get banned again?
 
no, he/she/they have more ID's than argie! they try to present the idea they have a following!
I guess if one has had a lobotomy or is a coward, that's someone that could follow them.
 
no, he/she/they have more ID's than argie! they try to present the idea they have a following!
I guess if one has had a lobotomy or is a coward, that's someone that could follow them.
Well, this clown uses the D Bag word which is the signature phrase of ContineallyIrish35 and KellyIrish35. So I guess he has 3 aliases now.
 
he has many more than that!
and they go back a few years; to be precise!

Paz:
your topic here deserves a comment. Why address posters as Kelly fans or Critics, instead of addressing ND fans.
I am a ND fan; before and after Kelly. Kelly is the current HC. If he wins, I would think a ND fan would be fine with that! If he does not win then he should not stay on as head coach. Root for ND - not for or against the coach.
 
he has many more than that!
and they go back a few years; to be precise!

Paz:
your topic here deserves a comment. Why address posters as Kelly fans or Critics, instead of addressing ND fans.
I am a ND fan; before and after Kelly. Kelly is the current HC. If he wins, I would think a ND fan would be fine with that! If he does not win then he should not stay on as head coach. Root for ND - not for or against the coach.
Because, as you have pointed out also, anyone who is not a Kelly fan to the Pro Kelly Supporters are not ND fans. In fact, they are trolls. So, the reverse argument can also be made. Any Kelly fans who are satisfied with an 8-5 record and the coach blowing at least 1 game a year with his decision making can be accused of non being ND football fans.
 
Paz, If we win out and end up 11-1 and out of the playoffs, will you and all the Kelly bashers be on this site talking about how Kelly blew the Clemson game? My guess is yes and that says more about you than the people that defend him. I like Kelly. I will root for him as long as he's the coach. Win or lose.
And Kelly didn't lose the Clemson game. 4 TOs and at least 5 dropped passes including a 2pt conversion that would have won us the game, lost us the Clemson game.
St Cecilia -- you are making objective football sense -- be careful. There are trolls everywhere led by purse + cvgr that want to take down anyone who supports coach Kelly - please be careful .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax
he has many more than that!
and they go back a few years; to be precise!

Paz:
your topic here deserves a comment. Why address posters as Kelly fans or Critics, instead of addressing ND fans.
I am a ND fan; before and after Kelly. Kelly is the current HC. If he wins, I would think a ND fan would be fine with that! If he does not win then he should not stay on as head coach. Root for ND - not for or against the coach.

hypocritical phony swine
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax
Because, as you have pointed out also, anyone who is not a Kelly fan to the Pro Kelly Supporters are not ND fans. In fact, they are trolls. So, the reverse argument can also be made. Any Kelly fans who are satisfied with an 8-5 record and the coach blowing at least 1 game a year with his decision making can be accused of non being ND football fans.


Stop the hair pulling. Enough of this nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax
Another ID with a foul origin! just bad genetics!

I have two pages of ignore lists and your fam of ID's are a full page.

Dispicable you! feel free to cut your fingers off! it would benefit this forum to no end!

You and yours have been the cancer on this board from the day you came along trying to censure and stiffle
(and best I can determine you have only been able to intimidate 1 poster)

What a sick puppy Purse is. Hoping someone cuts their own fingers off --- Is Purse with ISIS.
Someone who has two pages of posters on a ignore list takes this forum too seriously.
Maybe Purse needs to take a week or two off to mellow out a little. Maybe lrish35 will get out of your head.
xCartoons-Shouting-Match.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT