Not a problem. I was born in Indiana and raised in Michigan. Many of us a looking forward to the travel. Much better than the visit to Moscow Idaho. Also not all SC fans live in California.
He is hard to understand. Michigan and Indiana schools are redneck? Did Notre Dame move or is it exempt because it is in cosmopolitan South Bend.
From reading his posts I find it interesting and odd that he is a fan of Notre Dame. Indiana has some pretty fine universities for being a redneck state! 😉
I think I'm pretty effin' easy to understand. I'm bummed out and pissed that USC/UCLA are jumping ship like a couple of little bitches, and ruining the PAC-10 for nothing. And apparently it's too much to ask for USC fans to stand by their conference. And you're going to join the sorry-ass Big Ten when you're already in a great league, and maybe if more USC fans stood up and were counted this shit never would have gotten off the ground. But not you, though. You just lay down for any old short-term fix your misguided AD or whoever the douchebags are calling the shots at USC....
I didn't lie down for it, I fully support it. Trying to be part of a better league has been part of the discussion for years. The first attempt was to add Texas and Okie, but that failed. Maybe if all the SC fans stood up against it, the effort would have been blocked. The problem with that is most of the SC fans are delighted by it.
Do you think I would take your word for shit? I feel entirely confident USC fans are going to hate this. And this is in no way something that the USC fan nation has ever been pining for in any kind of numbers at all. I would submit at this point you're straight up lying. Mischaracterizing USC's position and situation so entirely that it's effectively a lie. There's been no building movement, no groundswell whatsoever for USC to leave the PAC-10 for greener pastures and join some other conference. Least of all for the sorry-ass Big Ten, which isn't even a lateral move, it's just a weird, inexplicable thing to do. And USC doesn't come off looking like some cool, hip team that does audacious shit and is ahead of the curve. No, you just like some broke-ass program that apparently needs the money that badly that you would do something this terrible.
Why would I lie about that? Do you think I care about how you feel? There has rarely been as much excitement on the SC boards as the morning that is was announced we were moving to the BIG. I am sorry you spent what must have been a lot time time talking to every fan in cfb, but they misled you. There was even a fair amount of excitement today when the UCLA move was approved. Not only does someone we play every year stay in our league, but because the regents are charging then Calimony, we will be getting more money than them.
gotta remember saavy has a very hard time dealing with opposition
Beach…Savvy is the only poster here that I have on ignore, so I’m left with only reading your responses to him. Still, informative and reinforces my decision to ignore. At any rate, good news today that UCLA has the blessing of the powerless regents to make the move, even with the Calimony you ascribe to the regents budget hostage taking. At any rate, given the history of USC vs UCLA rivalry, it’s good to know they have agreed to the ransom, and your rivalry with them will continue.
Is this a serious question? Why would you lie, why do people lie? Because you want something that isn't true to be treated as true? I know most people on message boards expect, or at least hope that, their bullshit will be taken at face value, but come on now. Do you honestly think if we undertook a hugely thorough, ten-part documentary series on this USC/UCLA move to the Big Ten that what we'd come away with is the unequivocal impression, that virtually 100% of the USC fan nation, from soup to nuts, institutionally at the highest reaches, right down to the most clueless grassroots thugs, that they're all in favor of this move, that USC nation is united, unanimous, and they've been pushing for such a move for a long time. From the most influential donors and officers to random tailgating dipshits.....
The team stays in Moscow Idaho when visiting Washington State. I should have been clearer.
I never claimed that everyone likes the move, just the people I know and the vast majority on the message boards I use. Someone would have to be a fool to claim to speak for everyone.
Dry true and there is no doubt the money was a huge part of the decision, although not the only part.
Whatever. I think I've sized you up just about right. In any case, the damage is already done, and now the die is finally, irrevocably cast....
I don’t know what to tell you. Like most SC fans I like the move, if you need to come up with some reason to believe I don’t based on your supposed knowledge of me that is fine if that is what you need.
LOL! Awesome. For a while, this USC fan was on your shit list. And you felt like he was someone you could be all hostile towards, and get your life-rage out on. I noticed that. But I will always be #1 on your little psycho hate list of posters you feel emboldened enough to F with. So if you have to choose, it'll always be me. Isn't that right, you little women's track coach? I just got sick and tired of this milk-toast USC fan having his little tea party over the disaster that is USC/UCLA joining the Big Ten.
This is another thing with disagree about. You think being courteous to another on a site is a character defect. I think being aggressive on an anonymous site is cowardly.
Well that's good to know, Mr. Milksop. Thank you for clarifying that. Anyway, I guess we're done arguing about this. You certainly know how I feel. I don't know if I can say the same for you. I wear my heart on my sleeve, while I consider you untrustworthy. Just in a general way, in terms of your opinions and judgements and observations. And you just say whatever you think is the right thing to say in a given situation, not what you actually think. One of those types. And you probably really don't think much of anything on any subject. You just calculate what you figure is the right opinion to have, and whatever that is becomes your 'opinion' by default.
I am not aggressive.
You are right, I don't. Not do I claim to speak for all of CFB fans. But I certainly have a better handle on USC fans than you.
Maybe. If you're being straight about it, and I'm suggesting that you're not. And that your characterizations of the pulse of the USC fan world are not accurate...
SC had an agreement to stay with the PAC until 2024. During that time, it tried to improve the conference by bringing in Texas and Oklahoma. That failed. It then tried to get it value and arguing for a spilt of revenue based on value like the BIG used when Rutgers and Maryland first joined. That failed. It argued for better presentation than the pathetic Pac 12 network. That failed.
Glutton for punishment. I do not read one word that poster writes. Same with 4-4-3.
I have to tell you that I was stunned to the point of disbelief when I was informed that USC and UCLA were abandoning the PAC 12 and going to the BIG.
Very well written and spot on. The PAC 12 leadership failed to realize that its' biggest football program was a private university and as such, always had options that state schools wouldn't have. No other power 5 conference has that dynamic. UCLA tagging along with USC is good news for the Big Ten has it totally locks up the LA market, but USC would have done the move without UCLA.
kinda of a way to leave California like the rest of the citizens! PAC12: ping pong and soccer
Classic, the typical meathead pseudo-intellectual CFB fan would sell his own children into slavery if it made good business sense. And then come onto message boards pat each other on the back over it. How prudent you're being....
I'm beginning to think that you're a troll. You're the same person as sjb. Your blatant milk toast routine is a little much, just like old boy's. And this post in particular that I'm responding to could have been written by the reviled sjb.
Go with that. What you call milk toast is simply not reacting to someone whose opinions make no sense and who you don't care about. Your posts are entertaining and a little sad, but not upsetting.
Well I don't want to believe something that isn't true. So if you're not, then you're not. But how would I ever know for sure? I guess that's the dilemma. I can say that in your latest utterly vapid post, you came off like a complete dead ringer for one of this board's most pitiful sad sacks. Which I guess could be simple coincidence.
