You dont get to complain about scheudle when you lose to florida and kentuckyThe SEC has a handful of legitimate top 12 teams that are going to be left out in place of far weaker teams. This is only going to stoke the "exclusive scheduling" fire between them and the big10 that there are rumors of.
There's no excuse regardless. If you got the talent, you just gotta win. However, I think you can make the argument that playing the lower ranked teams in the SEC is a bigger challenge than playing thr lower ranked teams from Big 12 or ACC. Sometimes I think a team loses not because they weren't good enough, but because it's just hard to beat talented teams weekly. It's the same reason why you never see anyone in the NFL go undefeated. Better teams lose to weaker teams all the time.You dont get to complain about scheudle when you lose to florida and kentucky
Why are people acting like Florida is some crap tier team at the bottom of the ACC?You dont get to complain about scheudle when you lose to florida and kentucky
The difference between 30th and 60th in F+ is pretty marginal because it’s normally distributedWhy are people acting like Florida is some crap tier team at the bottom of the ACC?
Florida is ranked 29th in F+ and have back to back wins vs two really good teams (Ole Miss & LSU)
You're a complete fool. You should actually read the drivel you post. F+ is garbage and not used. wins and losses and head to head matter period. NO ONE CARES IF AN OFFENSE PRODUCES 500 YARDS IN A GAME. ALL THAT MATTERS IS THE FINAL SCORE.The SEC has a handful of legitimate top 12 teams that are going to be left out in place of far weaker teams. This is only going to stoke the "exclusive scheduling" fire between them and the big10 that there are rumors of.
Can't speak for the committee, but I doubt that IU has any chance. We saw FSU get excluded from the playoffs last year and they were undefeated. It's clear that part of what goes into the decision is who can be competitive in the playoffs.Ole Miss definitely is. I don't know about IU, I don't think that's fair. If they can match our 66-7 thrashing of Purdue, I think they're back in. Or at least approximate it. Where does their SOS rank against ours? Our margin of victory is about the same. Our seasons are about the same. But we do have that precious A&M win. But also have the 'bad loss' to NIU. How does that compare to losing to tOSU by twenty?
You mean the same Florida that got destroyed by ACC Miami? Florida is a crappy bottom tier sh1t SEC teamWhy are people acting like Florida is some crap tier team at the bottom of the ACC?
Florida is ranked 29th in F+ and have back to back wins vs two really good teams (Ole Miss & LSU)
I know. I think they're effed. They needed it to be closer than that. All of the CFB cognoscenti was sharpening their knives this week ready to chop their resume to pieces. And they needed at least a close game to keep the hounds at bay. Where you're wrong is the good faith you attribute to the committee, who doesn't give a shit about who's competitive or not. They just don't want IU in the playoff because they suck and they're nobody. They don't carry any CFB cachet, and the powers that be of course are going to cater to the SEC and will look for any rationale to put their preferred brands into the field. Obviously that's the case, as was with FSU. As if they're going to be sitting their in their committee room with frowns on their faces, as they grapple to put teams into the bracket that could actually be competitive on the field, and that's the only reason IU's not going to get a bid.Can't speak for the committee, but I doubt that IU has any chance. We saw FSU get excluded from the playoffs last year and they were undefeated. It's clear that part of what goes into the decision is who can be competitive in the playoffs.
Money decides everything.I know. I think they're effed. They needed it to be closer than that. All of the CFB cognoscenti was sharpening their knives this week ready to chop their resume to pieces. And they needed at least a close game to keep the hounds at bay. Where you're wrong is the good faith you attribute to the committee, who doesn't give a shit about who's competitive or not. They just don't want IU in the playoff because they suck and they're nobody. They don't carry any CFB cachet, and the powers that be of course are going to cater to the SEC and will look for any rationale to put their preferred brands into the field. Obviously that's the case, as was with FSU. As if they're going to be sitting their in their committee room with frowns on their faces, as they grapple to put teams into the bracket that could actually be competitive on the field, and that's the only reason IU's not going to get a bid.
IU's not part of the club, that's why they're not getting in.
You sound like ESECPN. They play outside of conf and don’t look so good.The SEC has a handful of legitimate top 12 teams that are going to be left out in place of far weaker teams. This is only going to stoke the "exclusive scheduling" fire between them and the big10 that there are rumors of.
AND defense!The Indiana defense looked like it could hand but they had no answers for the oho state blitz. That game was really won by the Ohio state special teams
Yes but the special teams really opened up the two touchdown leadAND defense!
That's nasty...Spread them out. Wtf