ADVERTISEMENT

Notre Dame offense STRUGGLES during spring football practice No. 6

Not at all. I couldn't be more disappointed and unimpressed, with MF, if that indeed really is what he has in mind, and is perhaps why he was happy to handpick his sixth-rate legit crony OC, mainly because it comes with the advantage of being able to dictate to him exactly what he wants him to do, that being having a very deliberate run-first power-running game offense.... and that being because MF is so, unsophisticated shall we say, in his thinking, that he would actually do something like that when suddenly given executive power over a powerhouse football program. And hired really more for superficial reasons, and not because he's some obvious badass coach who's flat out earned his position through undeniable, compelling competence and ability and talent and acumen....

Or maybe it will work brilliantly and be a stroke of genius. And of course I have no idea if that's what MF actually has in mind or not. But if he does, and of course there is some reason to think he very well might have that in mind, then I don't even know what to say. Other than that, if I were in his position that's not what I would do, and most/many/all other coaches wouldn't either. Mainly because they would consider it a dubious philosophy to embrace, and they just wouldn't go down that road. And that's why nobody does it anymore, because it's just not the thing to do, for any number of reasons....

ND fans long for a smash-mouth offensive philosophy for emotional reasons, and it has nothing at all to do with football. And MF absolutely strikes me as someone very possibly insecure enough, as well as potentially incompetent enough, that he would be nevertheless willing to embrace an entire offensive philosophy and approach, firstly to please the fans, and be able to check that box.... and then frankly because he really doesn't know what else to do, and has no particular convictions regarding offensive football. And at the end of the day you have to make a choice and so this is what he's choosing. The clock is ticking and times waits for no man. It worked for Wisky so maybe it could work for us. And there's no greater insight or confidence or conviction in it than that......
Yawn
 
  • Like
Reactions: mirer03
Not at all. I couldn't be more disappointed and unimpressed, with MF, if that indeed really is what he has in mind, and is perhaps why he was happy to handpick his sixth-rate legit crony OC, mainly because it comes with the advantage of being able to dictate to him exactly what he wants him to do, that being having a very deliberate run-first power-running game offense.... and that being because MF is so, unsophisticated shall we say, in his thinking, that he would actually do something like that when suddenly given executive power over a powerhouse football program. And hired really more for superficial reasons, and not because he's some obvious badass coach who's flat out earned his position through undeniable, compelling competence and ability and talent and acumen....

Or maybe it will work brilliantly and be a stroke of genius. And of course I have no idea if that's what MF actually has in mind or not. But if he does, and of course there is some reason to think he very well might have that in mind, then I don't even know what to say. Other than that, if I were in his position that's not what I would do, and most/many/all other coaches wouldn't either. Mainly because they would consider it a dubious philosophy to embrace, and they just wouldn't go down that road. And that's why nobody does it anymore, because it's just not the thing to do, for any number of reasons....

ND fans long for a smash-mouth offensive philosophy for emotional reasons, and it has nothing at all to do with football. And MF absolutely strikes me as someone very possibly insecure enough, as well as potentially incompetent enough, that he would be nevertheless willing to embrace an entire offensive philosophy and approach, firstly to please the fans, and be able to check that box.... and then frankly because he really doesn't know what else to do, and has no particular convictions regarding offensive football. And at the end of the day you have to make a choice and so this is what he's choosing. The clock is ticking and times waits for no man. It worked for Wisky so maybe it could work for us. And there's no greater insight or confidence or conviction in it than that......
Can you name a football coach that structured and embraced his entire offensive philosophy and approach, firstly, to please the fans ?

Do you believe that fans are unified and speak as one when voicing their opinion ?
 
Its also an undeniable fact he is the losingest football coach!

But you had a problem with that!
If you had a scintilla of reading comprehension, which you don’t, you would have seen that I had no problem with that statement. I was clear in stating that being deemed the “winningest” and “losingest” coach is a function of the number of games played.

Have someone explain that to you.
 
If you had a scintilla of reading comprehension, which you don’t, you would have seen that I had no problem with that statement. I was clear in stating that being deemed the “winningest” and “losingest” coach is a function of the number of games played.

Have someone explain that to you.
No shit.

But you had to respond to me with "numerically hes the winningest coach in ND football history"

We both know it's only because he coached more games so who cares.

Hes like the 5th or 6th best coach in school history
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chitown11
No shit.

But you had to respond to me with "numerically hes the winningest coach in ND football history"

We both know it's only because he coached more games so who cares.

Hes like the 5th or 6th best coach in school history
Ouch!
 
The definition of "winningest" is: "having achieved the most success in competition". So peel another layer away and define "success"...."the accomplishment of an aim or purpose". Apparently, Knute Rockne, Ara Parseghian and Lou Holtz had a different aim or purpose than Brian Kelly did.
 
I will however say that I do believe that the sites were overly optimistic last year. So I am a little more cautious this year in believing the hype.

The only concerns I have for spring are:

-Keeping Buchner engaged and locked in.
-developing the best two deep at wr we can
-solidifying the ol depth chart

On defense I. Much more concerned

-get the dl to perform at higher level and get some beef inside
-competition at linebacker. Best guys have to play
-setting the safety depth chart

Post spring there will be transfers. Making sure we are losing guys that are passed over or not performing vs losing top guys due to pt is paramount.
I don't really care about any other fugazi
My sense is that the sites will -- UNTIL IF AND WHEN PROVEN WRONG -- continue to be OVERLY OPTIMISTIC. It's the nature of the MOMENT. A kind of FIX-CRAVING. People want their DOPAMINE. They almost feel that they're OWED.
 
Not at all. I couldn't be more disappointed and unimpressed, with MF, if that indeed really is what he has in mind, and is perhaps why he was happy to handpick his sixth-rate legit crony OC, mainly because it comes with the advantage of being able to dictate to him exactly what he wants him to do, that being having a very deliberate run-first power-running game offense.... and that being because MF is so, unsophisticated shall we say, in his thinking, that he would actually do something like that when suddenly given executive power over a powerhouse football program. And hired really more for superficial reasons, and not because he's some obvious badass coach who's flat out earned his position through undeniable, compelling competence and ability and talent and acumen....

Or maybe it will work brilliantly and be a stroke of genius. And of course I have no idea if that's what MF actually has in mind or not. But if he does, and of course there is some reason to think he very well might have that in mind, then I don't even know what to say. Other than that, if I were in his position that's not what I would do, and most/many/all other coaches wouldn't either. Mainly because they would consider it a dubious philosophy to embrace, and they just wouldn't go down that road. And that's why nobody does it anymore, because it's just not the thing to do, for any number of reasons....

ND fans long for a smash-mouth offensive philosophy for emotional reasons, and it has nothing at all to do with football. And MF absolutely strikes me as someone very possibly insecure enough, as well as potentially incompetent enough, that he would be nevertheless willing to embrace an entire offensive philosophy and approach, firstly to please the fans, and be able to check that box.... and then frankly because he really doesn't know what else to do, and has no particular convictions regarding offensive football. And at the end of the day you have to make a choice and so this is what he's choosing. The clock is ticking and times waits for no man. It worked for Wisky so maybe it could work for us. And there's no greater insight or confidence or conviction in it than that......
Despite my having to cut through with a MACHETE some of your denser extended clauses, HAT’S OFF TO YOU for the most honest ANALYTICAL DECONSTRUCTION of Marcus Freeman, the Marcus Freeman Phenomenon – A DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT ANIMAL FROM THE MAN – and the HYPER-EMOTIONAL and PSYCHOLOGICALLY COMPENSATORY mindset of many ND fans.

You really called the WHOLE THING OUT and in doing so, put it all SQUARELY ON THE TABLE.

Is your thesis correct? Who knows? But as an argument worth VETTING, I found it HIGHLY PLAUSIBLE. And when lacking all the facts, that’s the best anyone can hope for.

There are many other LOW HANGING TARGETS out there. I look forward to your TAKING AIM.
 
OMG, the offense is struggling in April? The 2023 season is doomed.
They love those bad wins ,playing down
Not at all. I couldn't be more disappointed and unimpressed, with MF, if that indeed really is what he has in mind, and is perhaps why he was happy to handpick his sixth-rate legit crony OC, mainly because it comes with the advantage of being able to dictate to him exactly what he wants him to do, that being having a very deliberate run-first power-running game offense.... and that being because MF is so, unsophisticated shall we say, in his thinking, that he would actually do something like that when suddenly given executive power over a powerhouse football program. And hired really more for superficial reasons, and not because he's some obvious badass coach who's flat out earned his position through undeniable, compelling competence and ability and talent and acumen....

Or maybe it will work brilliantly and be a stroke of genius. And of course I have no idea if that's what MF actually has in mind or not. But if he does, and of course there is some reason to think he very well might have that in mind, then I don't even know what to say. Other than that, if I were in his position that's not what I would do, and most/many/all other coaches wouldn't either. Mainly because they would consider it a dubious philosophy to embrace, and they just wouldn't go down that road. And that's why nobody does it anymore, because it's just not the thing to do, for any number of reasons....

ND fans long for a smash-mouth offensive philosophy for emotional reasons, and it has nothing at all to do with football. And MF absolutely strikes me as someone very possibly insecure enough, as well as potentially incompetent enough, that he would be nevertheless willing to embrace an entire offensive philosophy and approach, firstly to please the fans, and be able to check that box.... and then frankly because he really doesn't know what else to do, and has no particular convictions regarding offensive football. And at the end of the day you have to make a choice and so this is what he's choosing. The clock is ticking and times waits for no man. It worked for Wisky so maybe it could work for us. And there's no greater insight or confidence or conviction in it than that......
Tiger rant
 
No shit.

But you had to respond to me with "numerically hes the winningest coach in ND football history"

We both know it's only because he coached more games so who cares.

Hes like the 5th or 6th best coach in school history
You claimed that I had a problem with the statement, which I didn’t

Hence, I thought it was necessary to clarify his record for the numerically challenged, such as yourself.

Opinions vary as to where Kelly ranks as one of ND’s football coaches.

I always liked Ara because he took a rudderless program and immediately turned them into a team that came within less than two minutes from being the National Champion
 
My sense is that the sites will -- UNTIL IF AND WHEN PROVEN WRONG -- continue to be OVERLY OPTIMISTIC. It's the nature of the MOMENT. A kind of FIX-CRAVING. People want their DOPAMINE. They almost feel that they're OWED.
👍
 
Despite my having to cut through with a MACHETE some of your denser extended clauses, HAT’S OFF TO YOU for the most honest ANALYTICAL DECONSTRUCTION of Marcus Freeman, the Marcus Freeman Phenomenon – A DISTINCTLY DIFFERENT ANIMAL FROM THE MAN – and the HYPER-EMOTIONAL and PSYCHOLOGICALLY COMPENSATORY mindset of many ND fans.

You really called the WHOLE THING OUT and in doing so, put it all SQUARELY ON THE TABLE.

Is your thesis correct? Who knows? But as an argument worth VETTING, I found it HIGHLY PLAUSIBLE. And when lacking all the facts, that’s the best anyone can hope for.

There are many other LOW HANGING TARGETS out there. I look forward to your TAKING AIM.
Yeah, that was pretty bad, even for me. But there's a reason my posts are so dense, and quite frankly so unpleasant to read. I just want to get out my little rambling spiel quickly, without much regard for style, in about five minutes or so, maybe ten in this case. And sometimes they're hard to read, and whatever I can spit out without stopping, and I will readily admit it.

So nevertheless my point stands, Parker sucks as an OC. Or whatever, it was a super underwhelming hire. And if that indeed is why he was hired, because he won't put up a fight regarding MF's crude and/or blunt designs for a smash mouth style, then I don't have much great to say about MF either. Unless it works, in which case he will have the last laugh and look like a genius.

Does MF seem like the type who could be affected and/or influenced by some vague, but very much palpable sense of fan expectations? Absolutely yes, IMO. I don't know if that's true or not, I'm not in his inner circle. But I could definitely see it. Anyway, I think I've said enough on this subject, considering what precious little we have to go on....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4-4-3
Just to expound on this horrible take...by a poster that generally find nothing positive about Notre Dame...


If the offense came out and shredded the defense...this poster would be bitching about al golden.

The fact is, the defensive players generally know where to be, what to do, and how to do it....at the first practice vs the offense. Basically they man up, sprint to the ball, and pressure. It's pretty damn easy to do while you spend spring on technical details and nuance.


The offense meanwhile for the first time has to deal with... Holes that don't open, wrs being knocked off their routes or redirected, pressure pickups, rbs have to block, qbs get hands in their face. The only way to dial this in is with reps. It takes time.

This happens to EVERY SINGLE FOOTBALL TEAM IN Existence at the beginning of spring ball. NONE of this has anything to do with the OC at the time. If Tommy were still here the same thing would happen.

It's exceedingly rare, and usually a very bad sign for the defense to have issues early in spring.

Brian Kelly makes more annually(9.81 million currently) than Ryan Day and Jim Harbaugh. That surprised me.

That MUST mean he is one of the best, smh
How about Jimbo Fisher?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chitown11
Numerically he is the losingest coach. Also a numerical fact.
I Never disputed that, but again, when you coach the most games, 23 games more than any other coach, that’s no surprise.

The cstegorization is beyond moronic and akin to referring to Lou Holtz the second losingest coach in Notre Dame football history !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chitown11
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT