Oh dear, I was hoping that I were sufficiently presenting the matter at hand in a suitable enough matter so as not to trigger yet another emotional outburst. I apologize.
Again, I do not wish my observations on the program to offend another. I am merely applying my logic to present an accurate picture of the program in hopes of sparing others that may lack the abilities from further disappointment and internal strife.
I do admit some weaknesses in restraining myself from pointing out the inaccuracies of others. My colleagues can attest to the nasty habit although they must humorously admit that it does in the end ultimately benefit them in their endeavors.
I find that perhaps our issue lay in the phenomenon that I present analysis to the masses at which point you at times respond to the analysis and at that point in time I must mistake that to mean you wish further discourse on the matter. If this is not your intention when replying to my posts please grant me that insight so I can better attempt to improve our interactions.
