ADVERTISEMENT

Lou Holtz sounds off on BK

thehellyousay

Rockne's Water Boy
Jan 2, 2010
554
281
63
One of the most successful coaches in Notre Dame football history was not satisfied with the decision of someone who can be identified by the same descriptor.

Lou Holtz, the last coach to win a national championship at Notre Dame in 1988, sounded off on Brian Kelly, Notre Dame’s all-time leader in wins, for leaving the Fighting Irish to become the head coach at LSU.

“You just don’t leave Notre Dame,” Holtz said on The Crowd’s Line. “You don’t go to Notre Dame for the money. My average salary for 11 years was $115,000. Now he’s going to go because of money and all the perks, etc.”

Kelly, 60, signed a 10-year, $95 million contract plus incentives with LSU. The terms of his Irish contract were never disclosed because Notre Dame is a private university, but Kelly was likely not making nearly as much during his 12-year stay in South Bend.

Holtz stepped down from his post at Notre Dame following the 1996 season. He was 59. He didn’t leave straight for another program like Kelly did, though. He took two seasons off from coaching before taking the South Carolina job in 1999.

Holtz obviously had plenty of signature wins in his Notre Dame tenure. He couldn’t have won a national title without them. As for Kelly? Holtz sounded off on that topic, too.

“I cannot think of one marquee win he ever had over a top-10 team other than they beat Clemson when they had the second-string quarterback,” Holtz said. “When Clemson played them again the same year with [Trevor] Lawrence, they dominated Notre Dame.”

Kelly went 4-13 against top-10 teams while at Notre Dame according to ESPN.

Holtz wasn’t finished.

“The other thing that bothered me about him, he never talked about Notre Dame and what really made it great,” Holtz said. “To be part of Notre Dame, you have to talk about the Lady on the Dome. You have to feel the spirit of Notre Dame. You just got to be part of it.

“It’s just something you feel [an] awesome responsibility to the Notre Dame fans but [also] to Notre Dame itself. That never materialized.”

Ironically, Holtz said in his exit interview in 1996 that he had no desire to become the winningest head coach in Notre Dame history. He finished his tenure with 100 wins, five shy of Knute Rockne’s record of 105. Holtz said 25 years ago the record should belong to Rockne “or some other coach in the future.”

That “other coach” wound up being Kelly. Little did Holtz know he’d be speaking on Kelly in this manner all these years later.

“He is an excellent coach and he did a wonderful job,” Holtz said. “He left the program in much better shape than when he first arrived. But to go somewhere for money, I just don’t think that’s the right reason.”
 
In my opinion, the administration gave Kelly more freedom and support than Weiss, Willingham, and Davie combined. Heck, Lou won us a national championship (2 really), but even he didn't survive Dunbar affair and the program's first major violation.

The administration trusted Kelly and gave him freedom to make changes to the program. He made lots of changes, most of which were badly needed. But then right out the gate he has a student die at practice because of a stupid and unnecessary decision. Jack and the administration supported Kelly. And Kelly wanted to move study hall to the Gug, and the administration said sure. What could possibly go wrong with that? We did compete (albeit poorly) for a title in short order with Weis's recruits. But it came at the cost an ACADEMIC cheating scandal, probation, and two years of vacated wins. Was it worth it? Jack and the administration must have thought so because Kelly maintained their unwavering support. In his SEVENTH season Kelly goes 4-8, with multiple players involved in an arrest for guns and drugs, but Jack and the administration never flinched. They continued to support him. Then Kelly, a highly experienced head coach who absolutely knew better, poses for a pic at a high school with a recruit. His decision combined with another coach's earns the program a second probation, with recruiting restrictions. Kelly knowingly broke the rules and risked the program because he didn't want to alienate a high school kid. And Jack and the administration still supported Kelly's stewardship. And along the way he got a major stadium expansion, his jumbotron, fake grass, and the flashy uniforms that he needed to wow recruits. The administration supported all that stuff, backed by a considerable capital investment.

Kelly had the administration's trust. The public perception was he didn't always handle it well. And at times, it reflected poorly on the school. And yet he had the balls to go on national tv and suggest that the university wasn't "aligned" with his interest in winning a title.

All of that, and what did he give us? Exactly zero championships and zero major bowl victories. Heck, we didn't even look prepared for some of those games.

I guess that what bothers me about Kelly. He had amazing support from Notre Dame, and he turned around and kicked everyone in the balls with that chickenshit shade. Adversity reveals character.

If anyone's values are out of alignment, its former coach Kelly's.
 
Last edited:
I guess going 4-13 against top 10 competition gives reason to feel better about him leaving. Winning 10+ games a year is nice, but you gotta be able to beat the best to be the best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgc7 and r2p2
Love Lou......I hope Maximus brings him on campus to talk to the team immediately.....just something about that guy
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgc7 and Golson5
In my opinion, the administration gave Kelly more freedom and support than Weiss, Willingham, and Davie combined. Heck, Lou won us a national championship (2 really), but even he didn't survive Dunbar affair and the program's first major violation.

The administration trusted Kelly and gave him freedom to make changes to the program. He made lots of changes, most of which were badly needed. But then right out the gate he has a student die at practice because of a stupid and unnecessary decision. Jack and the administration supported Kelly. And Kelly wanted to move study hall to the Gug, and the administration said sure. What could possibly go wrong with that? We did compete (albeit poorly) for a title in short order with Weis's recruits. But it came at the cost an ACADEMIC cheating scandal, probation, and two years of vacated wins. Was it worth it? Jack and the administration must have thought so because Kelly maintained their unwavering support. In his SEVENTH season Kelly goes 4-8, with multiple players involved in an arrest for guns and drugs, but Jack and the administration never flinched. They continued to support him. Then Kelly, a highly experienced head coach who absolutely knew better, poses for a pic at a high school with a recruit. His decision combined with another coach's earns the program a second probation, with recruiting restrictions. Kelly knowingly broke the rules and risked the program because he didn't want to alienate a high school kid. And Jack and the administration still supported Kelly's stewardship. And along the way he got a major stadium expansion, his jumbotron, fake grass, and the flashy uniforms that he needed to wow recruits. The administration supported all that stuff, backed by a considerable capital investment.

Kelly had the administration's trust. The public perception was he didn't always handle it well. And at times, it reflected poorly on the school. And yet he had the balls to go on national tv and suggest that the university wasn't "aligned" with his interest in winning a title.

All of that, and what did he give us? Exactly zero championships and zero major bowl victories. Heck, we didn't even look prepared for some of those games.

I guess that what bothers me about Kelly. He had amazing support from Notre Dame, and he turned around and kicked everyone in the balls with that chickenshit shade. Adversity reveals character.

If anyone's values are out of alignment, its former coach Kelly's.
What a pathetic post.

You're just another self-involved BK hater....
 
  • Haha
Reactions: IRISHJD98
Kelly, who I supported and defended for 12 years, showed his true colors, he's a classless, low character human being. His talk of playing for national championships was all bullshit. Brian Kelly is about Brian Kelly, that's all. I cannot stand phoney people!! It's about money, period. I hope and pray that he fails miserably at LSU. And I pray we get in this year and win it without him
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotreDomer1
Kelly, who I supported and defended for 12 years, showed his true colors, he's a classless, low character human being. His talk of playing for national championships was all bullshit. Brian Kelly is about Brian Kelly, that's all. I cannot stand phoney people!! It's about money, period. I hope and pray that he fails miserably at LSU. And I pray we get in this year and win it without him
He's a complete phony.. Bubba has already picked up the southern accent in a day
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotreDomer1
I guess going 4-13 against top 10 competition gives reason to feel better about him leaving. Winning 10+ games a year is nice, but you gotta be able to beat the best to be the best.

If the goal is to be the best, ABSOLUTELY
 
I have not heard ONE person in college football, not trash Kelly over how he left this team twisting in the wind. Not even Paqui is sticking up for him LOL. Kelly has also lost his fire. I don't think he'll be coaching in three years. But he'll parachute out with his LSU suckers money. It worked out great for ND though. Kelly can now work on his fake accent lol! You should have seen the LSU fans on their boards shredding him. I don't think he has a friend in the world right now. Well...accept savvy the ultimate Kelly homer.
 
It says a lot when Tommy Rees and Michael Elston turned down the opportunity to follow him. He gave Coach Elston his first coaching job and stayed with him up to the lsu job.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT