Well, that was a very measured conclusion. You briefly acknowledged, or at least obliquely alluded to his huge body of bottom line success, while the large part of your time was spent highlighting his manifold failings and shortcomings. And well as your own disappointment at what you are characterizing, I feel rather tendentiously, as his underperformance at LSU thus far, shall we say, which is unwarranted, as he's not especially underperformed at all. On account, naturally, of all those various inadequacies. But you do wish him well, which is generous, and I'm sure is not lost on him, as he was able to at least bring a modicum of respectability to ND, nothing more. And your final sentiments are the always gracious expressions of pity, pity for the desperation, your word, so palpable in his most recent public appearances, aka routine press conferences, where he did not promise a national title for LSU next season. Very much did not do that. And then you finished off with a more openly hostile dig at the canard that is wielded most tediously against him. Can't win the big one!
All in all, an extremely transparent, almost platitudionously passive aggressive takedown of ND's all-time winningest coach. I'd like to give you more credit than that, and admire you for your magnanimity, but I just can't. That was some pretty weak sauce.