Just wanted to point out that your a d bag and now your on ignore -- buh bye
It's nice to see Zaire calling out kelly for his "chicken crap" decision.
- Thread starter cgvr
- Start date
Just wanted to point out that your a d bag and now your on ignore -- buh bye
I haven't heard anything out of Kizer that would give you the impression that he doesn't also think he won the starting job.
Well he didn't shut the hell up and called the HCs decision "chicken crap" only because he's too polite to say sh**. Any idea on how we are going to handle the blind side when we rotate qbs?
hardly an issue. wasn't last year when malik went down. everyone taking kelly to task but i GUARANTEE the guy who had the biggest influence in this decision is mike sanford. position coaches pretty much make the personnel decisions.
he is not and neither of you are smart enough to understand why.
Don't try to pass off Porky's indecisiveness onto Sanford.
Isn't dopey going to be rotating backs/others too?
Quite frankly, my issues on top of the clear lack of leadership are the potential problems with rhythm, consistency, timing.....
no way this isn't a Head Coach decision! hmm, are we warming up the backwards bus before the 1st snap?
In 2006 Leak had 365 passing attempts and Tebow had 33.
Leak rushed 77 times and Tebow rushed 89.
I'm not sure of the point you are making.
The only time I can find that he did something comparable was 2009.
Pike threw 338 passes. Collaros threw 124.
Pike rushed 31 times to Collaros 57.
http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/cincinnati/2009.html
Hopefully they block the guy in front of them.. These are grown men, they can snap the ball to a pair of different hands and block the guy wearing an orange/white jersey in front of them. Good Lord
Their job changes very little. 90% of the playbook is equally applicable to both guys. This isn't like the Music City Bowl where we had two different styles of QB alternating based on down and distance. The 10% difference is really more in tendency, where Malik is somewhat more likely to have a planned QB run called than Kizer is. But we had plenty of planned QB runs with Kizer last year, so it's not like Kelly/Sanford won't call them. They really are very interchangeable.
I thought we'd see both of them against Texas all along, but I did think one would be a starter and one would be the backup. I am anxious to see if one of them distinguishes himself. I suspect one will, at least to some degree. Based on all practice reports they have both looked very good, very comfortable, and, in a positive way, neither has distinguished himself.
Pike got hurt and then Zach came in.
Kelly, UC version, uses a moving pocket more so than 'runs' the QB.
That may be true for the D-Line rotation and who plays the nickel back. The head coach is picking the QB. There's too much riding on it, it's too visible, and he knows he will be held responsible anyway, good or bad.
Now that doesn't mean that Kelly and Sanford don't watch every practice snap on film and discuss the pros and cons, with Sanford having lots of input. But it's Kelly making the ultimate decision, and Sanford living with it.
neither of you obviously understand the workings of a major college football program.
not passing off anything. it's how things work at this level. sanford is the guy who is in the qb room, who administers the tests and breaks down the practice film. same as every other position coach. personnel decisions are based on position coach recommendations. period. can the head coach veto ? of course. to devalue mike sanfords role in the qb decision is nothing more than ignorance.
you just don't understand how it works. yes kelly made the decision. yes sanfords input was easily the biggest factor in that decision.
no matter what kelly does you'll find fault so take your ignorance and shove it.
there is a slight difference in the excecution of the playbook; with DK there are more successful plays between the hash marks; that was what was unique about '15. ND utilized the entire field.
Thanks for the chuckles. Zaire blasted Porky with a howitzer. I find it very amusing that he has zero problems firing away at dopey.
So, do you believe Sanford said, "I can't decide who is better. So, play both of them" and the gnome bit on that? You are unglued.
Yeah, Sanford said, "it's a tie...." At the end of the day once again our HC is clueless and a star player called him out on it. "Chicken crap"..... does it get more accurate than that?
if i was a teammate i'd be telling him to shut his piehole. don't need any distractions.
no, i believe sanford said that both have earned the right to play . you REALLY don't understand how things work. it's ok to admit it. it's no different than denson deciding how many rb's will play.
that quote is childish and immature. no wonder you like it. zaire would be best served to shut his trap and focus on texas.
what if the fair decision is that they have both earned the right to play ? i'm thrilled that nd has two players at such a high profile position that are both more than capable of leading the offense and are basically interchangeable. yet some here choose the negative. shocking.
