Right now, he is doing nothing to help his "brand".
Moore's win in Alabama proves that the Brand is bigger than Trump himself. Just keep draining the swamp even if Trump gets drained with it.
Right now, he is doing nothing to help his "brand".
It is NOT their First Amendment Right. It is specifically forbidden by the NFL labor agreement. If you work for Ford, P&G, Cigna, Palmolive or other major corporation and stand up at your desk and spout your political agenda, you will be fired. You should really understand about what you speak before blathering forth.It's a big story, Bodi. The President of the United States calling its tax paying citizens 'sons of bithces' for exercising their first amendment rights. But the bigger story is (after Charlottesville, and his family's company's denial of housing to blacks, to the central park five, to trumpeting the bogus claim that our first black president was not American, his comments about Mexican during the campaign, the Gold Star family, etc. etc.) is further proof of our President's racism. 70% of NFL players are black and we still have real work to do in this country on race. Kudos to the players for drawing attention to a issue we need to be talking about. Shame on our President for making the situation worse.
If 70% of the players are black as you state, doesn't that make their action racist in itself.It's a big story, Bodi. The President of the United States calling its tax paying citizens 'sons of bithces' for exercising their first amendment rights. But the bigger story is (after Charlottesville, and his family's company's denial of housing to blacks, to the central park five, to trumpeting the bogus claim that our first black president was not American, his comments about Mexican during the campaign, the Gold Star family, etc. etc.) is further proof of our President's racism. 70% of NFL players are black and we still have real work to do in this country on race. Kudos to the players for drawing attention to a issue we need to be talking about. Shame on our President for making the situation worse.
It is NOT their First Amendment Right. It is specifically forbidden by the NFL labor agreement. If you work for Ford, P&G, Cigna, Palmolive or other major corporation and stand up at your desk and spout your political agenda, you will be fired. You should really understand about what you speak before blathering forth.
It might make them racist but it definitely solidifies them being stupid.If 70% of the players are black as you state, doesn't that make their action racist in itself.
If said employee was voicing or demonstrating to show their belief.....You sure about that? If their actions are "forbidden by the NFL labor agreement," several owners are not only allowing the players to do this, but are actively joining the players.
As for your other claim that, if you work for a major corporation, but "spout your political agenda, you will be fired" I have worked for some corporations, both large and small, and employees regularly discussed politics, wore political buttons, and otherwise spouted their "political agenda" at work. None were reprimanded at all, much less fired. In fact, I don't think I have ever worked anywhere where politics was not discussed regularly.
If said employee was voicing or demonstrating to show their belief.....
And it put the company into a derogatory light or it cost the company sales directly or indirectly, then you bet your ass they'd be dismissed.
You're talking about employee gibberish amongst other employees. Once it would become disruptive to the profit of the company you better believe they'd be shown the door.
You sure about that? If their actions are "forbidden by the NFL labor agreement," several owners are not only allowing the players to do this, but are actively joining the players.
As for your other claim that, if you work for a major corporation, but "spout your political agenda, you will be fired" I have worked for some corporations, both large and small, and employees regularly discussed politics, wore political buttons, and otherwise spouted their "political agenda" at work. None were reprimanded at all, much less fired. In fact, I don't think I have ever worked anywhere where politics was not discussed regularly.[/QUOTE]
That is interesting ---places I have worked at people try to stay away from talking politics because it stirs emotions up. Not good for business.
You sure about that? If their actions are "forbidden by the NFL labor agreement," several owners are not only allowing the players to do this, but are actively joining the players.
As for your other claim that, if you work for a major corporation, but "spout your political agenda, you will be fired" I have worked for some corporations, both large and small, and employees regularly discussed politics, wore political buttons, and otherwise spouted their "political agenda" at work. None were reprimanded at all, much less fired. In fact, I don't think I have ever worked anywhere where politics was not discussed regularly.
Simply wrong. I am a CPA and have worked at a few companies. I know I wouldn't be allowed to wear a MAGA/Anti-Abortion hat or tie at any of these firms. Now maybe a Mexican Flag or a Planned Parenthood tie would be allowed, but I doubt it.
Yeah people discuss politics at work but you don't do it or advertise it in front of clients. When you are in a service business you can't afford to offend a potential 50 % of your client base.
Then it's not simply wrong. By your own admission, some politically tinged things are allowed at work. I can't imagine that, even at an accounting firm, a button promoting candidate A for president would be grounds for termination.
Again you are wrong. Interactions between staff are totally different than what any business wants presented to the general public. If I had a Trump Button on my suit I would be in violation of the firm's stated dress code and subject to discipline including dismissal. While companies like Hobby Lobby, etc may present a public political stance, most want their public presence to be neutral. Sorry if you don't believe it.
Perhaps that's why you state working at companies as in plural....This is your opinion, nothing more and nothing less. . This is not a fact.
You really want to go there? "President Obama commuted the sentences of 330 more federal inmates Thursday (1-19-17), capping an unprecedented clemency effort that has now released 1,715 prisoners — more than any other president in history." - USA Today
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...utations-bringing-total-record-1715/96791186/
Give me a break! The WAR against Law Enforcement is over and Obama and his crowd loss.
Great post on the racist PC network.Turned off ESPN! Except the 4 hours when ND is on. I don't miss it, not Gameday, not SportsCentsr, not Michael Smith and J. Hills Black Lives Matter show, I turned off the NFL this year.
I'm tired being lectured by athletes and celebrities about how I should vote or how I should ride a bus with 100 smelly people, when they pal-around on carbon heavy private jets.
I'm ready to move to the mountains and not have a television.
You're entitled to your opinion. It is disgraceful and the majority of Americans feel that way.This is all so ridiculous. America was founded on revolutionary thought and all Americans have an obligation to raise questions when we see wrong.
While some here may disagree this protest IS NOT about dishonor to our flag or does not diminish the sacrifice many have made, it celebrates those very things because as they fought to give us our right to protest in a civil manner and our founding fathers would agree with the manner we see this protest.
I have a flag on my house, children on active duty and respect and love this country as much or more than anyone here, so please attack elsewhere and read a bit of American history.
This is all so ridiculous. America was founded on revolutionary thought and all Americans have an obligation to raise questions when we see wrong.
While some here may disagree this protest IS NOT about dishonor to our flag or does not diminish the sacrifice many have made, it celebrates those very things because as they fought to give us our right to protest in a civil manner and our founding fathers would agree with the manner we see this protest.
I have a flag on my house, children on active duty and respect and love this country as much or more than anyone here, so please attack elsewhere and read a bit of American history.
You guys are SO GAY for Trump. You should just refer to him as Daddy on this website. We'll know who you are talking about. Or better yet let's just stick to football and you guys can all start your own private chat room where you don't have to hold back so much.Good Lord. They were streaming about those tweets day and night. No wonder some leftists were very upset Saturday afternoon. They were being brainwashed by the left wing media.
No one is arguing the right to protest or disagree. However those rights do not apply in a workplace environment. As a boss I expect my employees to be working when they are on my dime and following my rules for workplace decorum, dress etc. What they do on their own time is their business. If they choose to use my time to do political protests I have a right to fire them.
Question...Should the right to protest include the right to block streets and highways that hinder your ability to get to work or worse get to a hospital in an emergency? Freedom of speech and expression should not be allowed to decend into complete anarchy or we might as well just forget the whole "civilization" concept.
Big, huge, tax cut for the rich. Big, big cuts for the Trump family and his hedge fund manager friends. Nothing for the middle class and the poor will see taxes increase. Don't believe the lies. Look at the facts of this tax plan. It s a boondoggle for the wealthy in this country (the people who least need a tax break are getting a 3% decrease. And homeowners in NJ and NY are gonna take a big hit when they can't write off state and local taxes.
Rich get richer and...
...And the deficit goes up, up, up. Put a flag on that. The rich are forcing us to our knees.
The problem with your version of events is that the NFL leadership and most owners agree with the players as it does not effect their efforts or the product they produce. Rather than castigate these players they should be listened to as their intention is to allow peaceful protest on a very large stage to make a difference.
As to blocking streets and much f the other nonsense that goes with protest I disagree with those tactics, yet I should remind you that most disagreeded with those who staged the Boston Tea Party and Muhammad Ali.
The problem with your version of events is that the NFL leadership and most owners agree with the players as it does not effect their efforts or the product they produce. Rather than castigate these players they should be listened to as their intention is to allow peaceful protest on a very large stage to make a difference.
As to blocking streets and much f the other nonsense that goes with protest I disagree with those tactics, yet I should remind you that most disagreeded with those who staged the Boston Tea Party and Muhammad Ali.
Wrong.
A doubling of the standard deduction will be a boon to a significant number of lower income people that have never been able to itemize.
Lower corporate taxes and a repatriation of overseas cash will allow for larger dividends and more jobs . The rich will have more investment income to pay tax on and thus will pay more actual tax.
I live in CA which has just as high individual taxes as NY so the loss of a state income tax deduction will hurt. But consider that a very large number of the 1% live in CA and NY and will thus be paying higher federal taxes without the state income tax deduction.
You lefties love to pontificate but are too lazy to actually look at the numbers. The national debt doubled in 8 years of Obama but you're worried now??
NFL attendance and viewership is down so the owners are going to see that this crap does affect their bottom line eventually. Then they will renegotiate the CBA and institute team rules against this behavior. These players have no more right to a public forum than you or I do. If the Owners want to let them protest, so be it. If no one watches the games that will change, as it should..
There is a huge deal of debate on all of this. Let's see what bill actually passes before we make grandiose predictions.
You guys are SO GAY for Trump. You should just refer to him as Daddy on this website. We'll know who you are talking about. Or better yet let's just stick to football and you guys can all start your own private chat room where you don't have to hold back so much.
Not a homophobe or on the left, snowflake. But I don't worship your Daddy like you do.. Haha your avatar is like the inside of High School girls locker. This is a football forum.A homophobe on the left.
Is anyone questioning their right to protest?A Green Beret who also believes in the right to protest :
http://www.businessinsider.com/army-veteran-nfl-players-kneeling-during-national-anthem-trump-2017-9
James Madison still owned slaves. There is no justice.Steve Mnuchin says forcing athletes to stand for the National Anthem "Is about respect for our military."
Steve ran a bank that foreclosed on 54 active duty members, in violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act.
Is anyone questioning their right to protest?
No. If he said they should be arrested by public law enforcement, THAT would be questioning their right to protest. Being fired by a private employer is not hindering your right to protest, it's a ramification of your protest.The President says they should be fired if they continue to peacefully protest. That could broadly be classified as "questioning".
No. If he said they should be arrested by public law enforcement, THAT would be questioning their right to protest. Being fired by a private employer is not hindering your right to protest, it's a ramification of your protest.
He can voice his opinion. Nobody has to agree with it.For what it's worth, I find it somewhat troublesome when a President encourages (and even demands) that a private citizen get fired by his or her employer based on speech.
It's not the speech..For what it's worth, I find it somewhat troublesome when a President encourages (and even demands) that a private citizen get fired by his or her employer based on speech.