Good decision. It's way better than complaining about a SB halftime show.
I meant porn.
Good decision. It's way better than complaining about a SB halftime show.
I have watched Mick Jagger grab his crotch numerous times. Rihanna and Jagger are not alone.I meant porn.
I have watched Mick Jagger grab his crotch numerous times. Rihanna and Jagger are not alone.
Maroon 5, Shakira/J-Lo, The Weeknd, Eminem....I do not consider them pigs.Did he smell his fingers? Does he have a vagina? Rihanna was tame. I actually like her. At least she kept her clothes on. Much better than the pigs they’ve had on the past few years. It was almost great.
Patrick Mahomes decided the game.Looks like the refs have the final say in the outcome of the game.
True, and the refs extended the final drive to milk the clock away before the field goal.Patrick Mahomes decided the game.
Bullshit. ESPN showed the replay multiple times. The WR was grabbed and held, twice.True, and the refs extended the final drive to milk the clock away before the field goal.
It was weak.Bullshit. ESPN showed the replay multiple times. The WR was grabbed and held, twice.
One gave birth mid flight then on the ground got it aborted.But thank god for the all female flyover. I feel safer.
I bet they all abort their kids in liberal Arizona someday. #FREEDOMBetting those female pilots could kick your arse! 😁
No it didn’t.The Pandemic had a significant negative effect on many people, young and old.
And the rainbow on the Carl Vinson, and the all minority halftime showBut thank god for the all female flyover. I feel safer.
I just watched the replay again. 50-50 call.It was weak.
Are you threatened by female fighter pilots?I bet they all abort their kids in liberal Arizona someday. #FREEDOM
one of the dumbest posts Ive ever readThat was the worst ending to a SB I've ever seen. They gotta make a new rule, and you gotta score if you can. And it's a fifteen yard penalty to slide at the one yard line....
No it's not, it's a good idea. It was a terrible end to the game, totally sufficiently shitty and unsporting and just generally terrible enough to motivate a rules change, so as to discourage intentionally not scoring a TD, and sitting on the ball so as to make a chip shot FG as the clock runs out. You could also make it so the defense can be flagged for deliberately letting them score.one of the dumbest posts Ive ever read
While we’re at it, let’s also flag running out of bounds to stop the clock, spiking the ball intentionally to stop the clock, and only kicking the ball 10 yards on the kickoff in an effort to recover it when trailing….all of these are “very unsporting”. Come on. 😉No it's not, it's a good idea. It was a terrible end to the game, totally sufficiently shitty and unsporting and just generally terrible enough to motivate a rules change, so as to discourage intentionally not scoring a TD, and sitting on the ball so as to make a chip shot FG as the clock runs out. You could also make it so the defense can be flagged for deliberately letting them score.
It's a great idea....
No, not come on. That ending was a disaster. You had a player very intentionally and visibly not scoring, as well as a defense seemingly willing to let them score, and such cynical tactics on both sides could easily be discouraged with a rules change. Or it's certainly worth a look see. And some serious consideration.While we’re at it, let’s also flag running out of bounds to stop the clock, spiking the ball intentionally to stop the clock, and only kicking the ball 10 yards on the kickoff in an effort to recover it when trailing….all of these are “very unsporting”. Come on. 😉
Should Deshone Kizer have used that strategy against Stanford ?No, not come on. That ending was a disaster. You had a player very intentionally and visibly not scoring, as well as a defense seemingly willing to let them score, and such cynical tactics on both sides could easily be discouraged with a rules change. Or it's certainly worth a look see. And some serious consideration.
Could not watch that hot mess.Rihanna just intentionally grabbed her crotch and pretended to smell her fingers. Gross when you’re good looking. Even worse when you’re not. Vomit.
Why be a dickhead? Why?????One gave birth mid flight then on the ground got it aborted.
So you favor rule changes that would prevent you from running out the clock ?No, not come on. That ending was a disaster. You had a player very intentionally and visibly not scoring, as well as a defense seemingly willing to let them score, and such cynical tactics on both sides could easily be discouraged with a rules change. Or it's certainly worth a look see. And some serious consideration.
What new rule would you recommend ?No, not come on. That ending was a disaster. You had a player very intentionally and visibly not scoring, as well as a defense seemingly willing to let them score, and such cynical tactics on both sides could easily be discouraged with a rules change. Or it's certainly worth a look see. And some serious consideration.
Alright, then.... Nevertheless, NFL teams only recently started doing this, this hyper tactical efficiency, where one team is daring the other to score, and often willing let them walk into the end zone, while the team in possession is almost literally tripping over themselves not to score. That's not a good trend, and it really did kind of ruin the game. And there's no rule against make a rule against that....Wait! I forgot to include a pitcher intentionally throwing four absolutely unhitable balls to walk a batter, intentionally fouling another basketball player when losing in an effort to get the ball back, and missing a free throw on purpose when losing by more than 2 pts.
While I don’t agree with your rant at all, I’m also just having a little fun with you….atyour expense perhaps. All good!
The NFL has a “rules committee” that meets every year to review current rules and proposed rules.Alright, then.... Nevertheless, NFL teams only recently started doing this, this hyper tactical efficiency, where one team is daring the other to score, and often willing let them walk into the end zone, while the team in possession is almost literally tripping over themselves not to score. That's not a good trend, and it really did kind of ruin the game. And there's no rule against make a rule against that....
And I don't think you agree or don't agree, on the substantive part of the subject at least. I figure you just want to disagree with someone, just to be difficult, and this is as good an excuse as any. Otherwise you wouldn't have listed all those irrelevant examples, which would have no bearing on whether on not we should make a rule change for this situation. They come off as cheap talking points with no conviction behind them. The NFL or any sport or league is under no obligation to be consistent, and to let some gamesmanship ploys go, yet make others against the rules. There's just no connection there. They don't have a Supreme Court in the NFL to declare some new rule unconstitutional. It would just be a rule and the teams would have to manage accordingly.
At least I don't think they have an NFL SCOTUS, where rules can be challenged and possibly overturned by some sort of quasi-judicial decree. Though they do have instant replay.....
Why wasn't it catch when the eagles player had control of the ball against his helmet the ball didn't move,Looks like the refs have the final say in the outcome of the game.
You can not possibly be serious!No, not come on. That ending was a disaster. You had a player very intentionally and visibly not scoring, as well as a defense seemingly willing to let them score, and such cynical tactics on both sides could easily be discouraged with a rules change. Or it's certainly worth a look see. And some serious consideration.
No man, I'm totally serious. I don't even know what's controversial about that. This was the effin' Super Bowl, and the Chiefs RB is having to catch himself so he can clumsily down it at the one, barely suppressing all his normal, healthy competitive instincts and training, and NOT score the go-ahed TD, so he can bleed the clock down on his coach's orders... It's almost sort of a disgrace. It's definitely not good. And so that's what rules are for, and why pencils have erasers.You can not possibly be serious!
The object of the game is to score more points than your opponent, and if that involves employing a strategy that prevents your opponent from gaining possession of the ball, that’s a viable tactic.No man, I'm totally serious. I don't even know what's controversial about that. This was the effin' Super Bowl, and the Chiefs RB is having to catch himself so he can clumsily down it at the one, barely suppressing all his normal, healthy competitive instincts and training, and NOT score the go-ahed TD, so he can bleed the clock down on his coach's orders... It's almost sort of a disgrace. It's definitely not good. And so that's what rules are for, and why pencils have erasers.
Though it is fitting, for a socio-economy as ruthless and soulless as America's, that the beauty of the game as it were means absolutely nothing, and winning, however ugly and purely tactical and cynical, obviously trumps any other consideration. If there was some obscure strategy where you could win the game without even playing, and sit on the ball for 59 minutes and 59 seconds, everyone would probably nod in agreement....
I could, and did. Excellent show.Could not watch that hot mess.
It’s called smart football.No man, I'm totally serious. I don't even know what's controversial about that. This was the effin' Super Bowl, and the Chiefs RB is having to catch himself so he can clumsily down it at the one, barely suppressing all his normal, healthy competitive instincts and training, and NOT score the go-ahed TD, so he can bleed the clock down on his coach's orders... It's almost sort of a disgrace. It's definitely not good. And so that's what rules are for, and why pencils have erasers.
Though it is fitting, for a socio-economy as ruthless and soulless as America's, that the beauty of the game as it were means absolutely nothing, and winning, however ugly and purely tactical and cynical, obviously trumps any other consideration. If there was some obscure strategy where you could win the game without even playing, and sit on the ball for 59 minutes and 59 seconds, everyone would probably nod in agreement....