In the words of Mike Tyson, everyone has a plan until they get punched in the mouthThis is obvious to everyone
Thanks Irish Beer.the team that played Carolina an cuse wil beat clemson all depends if Marcus fixes the culture on Gameday at nd
No...the team that played Carolina an cuse wil beat clemson all depends if Marcus fixes the culture on Gameday at nd
Oh, absolutely. "Perfect."This would be a perfect opportunity to insert Angeli, if Pyne struggles. Clemson has zero intel on him, and maybe it sparks the offense.
Rees cannot throw the ball for Pyne. The receivers were open. If the intent is for Pyne to throw just a handful of times per game (like an option QB would), then they need to install more 2 and 3 back sets. Maybe we'll see some of that against Clemson.No...
We didn't HAVE to pass against Cuse..
We WILL HAVE TO pass against Clemson. Not all but chunk plays and convert some third and longs.
Moreover...notice how we ran roughshod through Syracuse...
Still didn't matter as like I've stated many times...
Rees absolutely positively can't help himself and will pass
Bingo. All day long. It could be ugly. What an opportunity for Rees to get creative. Will he? No evidence yet.Load the box and stuff the run. Pyne will have throw a lot
IT looks like UNC dodges Clemson in the regular season. With an upset win Saturday we will have basically locked up wins against the two teams playing for the ACC championship.the team that played Carolina an cuse wil beat clemson all depends if Marcus fixes the culture on Gameday at nd
You say as if that is a bad thing.Rees cannot throw the ball for Pyne.
True, this may not be the same Clemson team as years past, but they are still good, and I just don't see this ND team hanging with them. As you say, hopefully the receivers will make some plays, but hopefully, Pyne will as well. I just don't see us gashing Clemson on the ground all game long like we did against Syracuse.This isn’t quite the same Clemson team as in the recent years past. Still, they are very good. ND just needs to come ready to play. I do think Pyne will have to make some plays in order to win. Hopefully the receivers will make a few plays as well. ND showed what they are capable of doing at Syracuse. It wasn’t flashy, but it was very effective. Solid defense most of the game and lean on a strong run game plus good special teams. That is the key to their success. Hopefully the crowd will be loud as well. We shall see.
Yup your last paragraph is exactly right. But there’s always a first. Right ? I believe this is a pretty darn good Clemson defensive line. I also think special teams can be a difference maker in this game. We shall see.True, this may not be the same Clemson team as years past, but they are still good, and I just don't see this ND team hanging with them. As you say, hopefully the receivers will make some plays, but hopefully, Pyne will as well. I just don't see us gashing Clemson on the ground all game long like we did against Syracuse.
Ironically, if we do have a great success running the football, it will be the first time a Harry Hiestand offensive line has dominated a top opponent.
They don't have to load the box. The dline is so good there they can rush four and let the lbs sit back in zone and read.Load the box and stuff the run. Pyne will have throw a lot
Notice we had that going against Syracuse...Rees cannot throw the ball for Pyne. The receivers were open. If the intent is for Pyne to throw just a handful of times per game (like an option QB would), then they need to install more 2 and 3 back sets. Maybe we'll see some of that against Clemson.
"We WILL HAVE TO pass against Clemson. Not all but chunk plays and convert some third and longs"No...
We didn't HAVE to pass against Cuse..
We WILL HAVE TO pass against Clemson. Not all but chunk plays and convert some third and longs.
Moreover...notice how we ran roughshod through Syracuse...
Still didn't matter as like I've stated many times...
Rees absolutely positively can't help himself and will pass
I disagree that this is the game we lose. I actually think this is the game we've won in the past due to the fact clemson offense if far from elite.Agree. They will not load the box. They will play man to man, blitz the backers to hold our backs into max protect and double Mayer. Same thing OSU did and they have the athletes to cover us.
Not going to win this game in the power I.
These games we lose the last few years as the D wears out and we try to sustain long drives against the same talent. You need some 15 yarders.
Your are going to need some quick outs and screens. Your going to need crossing.
I just don’t see it with DP. Can’t win against a top 5 team with a 50% QB. It’s not possible.
When?I disagree that this is the game we lose. I actually think this is the game we've won in the past due to the fact clemson offense if far from elite.
maybe you should send your resume in to Freeman, show them how to run the offensive side of the ball l. 🤣ND needs to utilize 21 personnel. Similar to the SC days with bush and White. Use Tyree in the slot use him as an I back. Run some Wing T actions on the run game. Use tyree on the jet sweep etc.
this is the type of team that we've beat with a good D but not the best offense. A michigan/MSU type team (when MSU was good). This isn't the clemson offense under lawrence or watson.When?
Nah we didn't beat any top 5 teams under BK outside of Clemson without TL. Maybe this is similar to Oklahoma 12 team but outside of that, nothis is the type of team that we've beat with a good D but not the best offense. A michigan/MSU type team (when MSU was good). This isn't the clemson offense under lawrence or watson.
I'm not guaranteeing a win, but this isn't a team we have typically been steam rolled by.
Worst case this would be like the 2017 georgia team we SHOULD have beat at home.
Well.... just my observation. Tyree is flexible position wise. And he's not large. He needs more lead blocking or plays in space.maybe you should send your resume in to Freeman, show them how to run the offensive side of the ball l. 🤣
I don't disagree that we can win the game by throwing < 10 times. However, that assumes multiple formations in the backfield that we have not seen to date (e.g., similar to what Holtz did several times -- like the 1996 Orange Bowl against Florida State). At this point in his coaching career, I do not see Coach Freeman doing that. In fairness to the coaching staff, it must be extremely difficult to play "3 yards and a cloud of dust" when receivers are wide open down the field.Notice we had that going against Syracuse...
2 backs....
And then...
Nope...
Can't help himself...he HAS to throw the ball.
If someone said to him ...
You can beat Clemson next week but you have to run the ball every single play do you think he'd accept that offer?
No way in hell.
He's a robot and does things just to do things.
He can't help himself
do whatever cuse and wake did but just do it a little betterI don't disagree that we can win the game by throwing < 10 times. However, that assumes multiple formations in the backfield that we have not seen to date (e.g., similar to what Holtz did several times -- like the 1996 Orange Bowl against Florida State). At this point in his coaching career, I do not see Coach Freeman doing that. In fairness to the coaching staff, it must be extremely difficult to play "3 yards and a cloud of dust" when receivers are wide open down the field.
oklahoma is a good reference, but this team is very similar to msu/um teams we have beat. They are undefeated due to somewhat easy schedule. They don't have the QB or WRs that have crushed us in the past. At least the ones playing aren't them.Nah we didn't beat any top 5 teams under BK outside of Clemson without TL. Maybe this is similar to Oklahoma 12 team but outside of that, no
We've played them close but havent won these type of games.
A win against Clemson would probably be our 2nd or 3rd best win since BK and MF era. We usually lose these games