If we join the BIG, we will have a schedule much like ND had as an independent when I went to school there in the 1960's. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
ND will stay independent until the landscape turns into a two conference look,If we join the BIG, we will have a schedule much like ND had as an independent when I went to school there in the 1960's. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
I think when it's all said and done there will be 4 conferenceND will stay independent until the landscape turns into a two conference look,
AFC vs NFC style with divisions. Just like the NFL
And you would be wrong.You dont think we can get 10 games out of 60 p5 teams to schedule us?
I dont think getting 10 teams will be hard at all
Nah. There will be plenty of programs that will schedule us ever year.And you would be wrong.
Has Pat Fitzgerald started as an analyst at Alabama?And you would be wrong.
I know Nebraska left because of Texas holding all the cardsNo. They left because half the Big 12 was considering leaving for the Pac 12, and Missouri was considering leaving gor the Big Ten. They didn't want to get left behind.
Sure we can schedule Vandy, Indiana and Rutgers. Forget Michigan, USC and others. You are such an idiot.Nah. There will be plenty of programs that will schedule us ever year.
Guaranteed Sold out stadiums, national tv exposure
Scheduling games will be easy
I've seen this prediction in a few different places. Wouldn't this type of change go against the most powerful force driving all of this, which is money? The current expansions have generally provided more money for the expanding conferences, or at least kept them even on a per-school basis. The schools they have left to add would dilute the money base, though. My guess is that the B1G and SEC are both actually hoping that the current ACC & Big 12 stay intact so that they can enjoy their $$$ advantages as long as possible. They might even be willing to adjust their OOC scheduling philosophies to help preserve the status quo in the ACC & Big 12.ND will stay independent until the landscape turns into a two conference look,
AFC vs NFC style with divisions. Just like the NFL
That's your opinion. Based nothing on facts. We'll have plenty of options to make a competitive schedule. You're a little baby. Stop crying and man upSure we can schedule Vandy, Indiana and Rutgers. Forget Michigan, USC and others. You are such an idiot.
Lol, swing and a miss as usualTwo ways nd joins a conference is if they can’t go to the playoffs without winning a conference. So far, it seems we can get in without being in one.
The other is enough $. It’s all nd cares about nowadays (fattening the checks of the admins). But it’ll have to be epic $.
Okie dokieB1G is talking about a 13 game conference schedule and I expect SEC and maybe B12 follows suit. How would no access to the major conferences be a National Schedule? No more USC, Michigan, Georgia. It will be what is equivalent to G5 teams only…
It was for themI've been listening to this in Nebraska though alot of locals think joining the big 10 was a big mistake
That was ND’s continued commitment to wokeness, not because it couldn’t find any better teamsLike TN State?
Good pointIf we join the BIG, we will have a schedule much like ND had as an independent when I went to school there in the 1960's. The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Lol, swing and a miss as usual
Seems to be that ND had/has some significant upsides in terms of $$ if they join a conference.
And you have been complaining (under all your handles) about ND needing to spend more money on the football program
You have all sides covered
It was because of Texas when they launched their Longhorn network. That rubbed the rest of the conference members the wrong way as it gave them additional revenue signing their own media rights deal outside of the conference.No they weren't. Oklahoma, A&M, Oklahoma St, and Colorado were all considering leaving, along with Texas.
If it was because of Texas, then those other schools would be trying to get away from Texas, not go with Texas.
No they weren't. Oklahoma, A&M, Oklahoma St, and Colorado were all considering leaving, along with Texas.
If it was because of Texas, then those other schools would be trying to get away from Texas, not go with Texas.
@topdecktiger We were talking about Nebraska and Mizzou. UTexas was destabilizing the Big12 by looking around for greener pastures and plotting to take some but not all the Big12 schools to the PAC10. Nebraska and others would have been crazy not to flee a conference that was about to sink.I know Nebraska left because of Texas holding all the cards
I know that. Nebraska and Colorado left because Oklahoma, Texas, Oklahoma St and A&M were considering leaving the Big 12 for the Pac 12. Plus, Missouri was considering the Big Ten.@topdecktiger We were talking about Nebraska and Mizzou. UTexas was destabilizing the Big12 by looking around for greener pastures and plotting to take some but not all the Big12 schools to the PAC10. Nebraska and others would have been crazy not to flee a conference that was about to sink.
Only after ESPN offered UT the LHN did Texas claim that it would 'save' the Big12. I don't know why any school would turn down a promotion out of that environment.
True, the schools that left the Big12 in 2011 did not find football success but they weren't really having any at that point either. Nebraska et al seem to peak at winning a division and losing the conf championship game.
It was for them
True but they went from being a Lord to barely an Esquire.Nebraska would have struggled in any conference. They wouldn't have defeated Oklahoma in the past decade.
I travel all around the different conferences fan bases and there's a lot of smoke that all of the conferences are - especially the SEC and Big Ten - loading up their members with strictly conference games in the next couple of years. Not sure what the Big 12 plans are but all of this makes sense with the CF conferences getting bigger and bigger.Nah. There will be plenty of programs that will schedule us ever year.
Guaranteed Sold out stadiums, national tv exposure
Scheduling games will be easy
Let's just pretend that happens and for some reason the Big2 don't want popular games. Would our November schedule really be worse than backfill with ACC or Big East teams as was true since the 90s? It is not believable that the big conferences would take schools like Pitt, Syracuse, and Baylor and then not allow them to schedule Marquee games.I travel all around the different conferences fan bases and there's a lot of smoke that all of the conferences are - especially the SEC and Big Ten - loading up their members with strictly conference games in the next couple of years. Not sure what the Big 12 plans are but all of this makes sense with the CF conferences getting bigger and bigger.
The point is, sure ND will find other schools to schedule as an independent but what will the quality of those schools be ?
True but they went from being a Lord to barely an Esquire.
ExactlyIt was because of Texas when they launched their Longhorn network. That rubbed the rest of the conference members the wrong way as it gave them additional revenue signing their own media rights deal outside of the conference.
Since Bo Pelini poor HC coaching choices till nowNebraska would have struggled in any conference. They wouldn't have defeated Oklahoma in the past decade.
When have you ever brought facts to this board?That's your opinion. Based nothing on facts. We'll have plenty of options to make a competitive schedule. You're a little baby. Stop crying and man up
I agree the Irish landed Teddy Rezac from Omaha and in very interested in a Linebacker. I believe Jones is his name but Rhule could change that. He has history of rebuildingNebraska football recruiting is abysmal. And has been for years.
Stop cryingWhen have you ever brought facts to this board?