InsideNDSports - In-State OL Ashton Craig Commits To Notre Dame Football
The Fighting Irish have their third offensive line commitment of the 2022 class.
notredame.rivals.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Heard lots of good things about this young man!InsideNDSports - In-State OL Ashton Craig Commits To Notre Dame Football
The Fighting Irish have their third offensive line commitment of the 2022 class.notredame.rivals.com
11th rated recruit out of the talented state of Indiana.Hard blocking 3 star with offers from Boston College, Florida State, Indiana, Iowa, Purdue, Vanderbilt, Baylor, Duke, Iowa State and Wake Forest .
So if his ranking changes expectations should too ?It’s as simple as he’ll either be better than his ranking or he won’t see the field as ND has talent on the oline lined up for next 3-4 years. I would expect ND to land a few “can’t miss” studs in the 2023 class.
So does this mean the staff expects to whiff and get none of the wisconsin guys?So if his ranking changes expectations should too ?
YesSo does this mean the staff expects to whiff and get none of the wisconsin guys?
No Hinzman no Schaefer no brunner ?
I thought Hinzman was a no go from his visit, and the buzz around Schrauth is that we no longer lead for him and that he is Whisky bound. The guy I thought we would get of this group was Brunner, and There’s lots of pressure to stay in State with Whisky. so Yes, we might whiff on all three after lots of optimism we would land at least two. Still hoping Brunner goes with us, but I’m really hoping we pull off a great upset and get Rice’s commitment. The thought of Baker and Spindler and Fisher and Rice competing to start next year is damn near surreal. Hope Rice has an incredible visit this weekend and Makes the conversion!So does this mean the staff expects to whiff and get none of the wisconsin guys?
No Hinzman no Schaefer no brunner ?
His ranking and how late we offered, yesSo if his ranking changes expectations should too ?
We only offered after not landing our top guys. That matters too11th rated by the staff ? Shouldn't their evaluations matter much more than those of some internet site ? Welcome young man.
How do you feel about Baker, Telx?I thought Hinzman was a no go from his visit, and the buzz around Schrauth is that we no longer lead for him and that he is Whisky bound. The guy I thought we would get of this group was Brunner, and There’s lots of pressure to stay in State with Whisky. so Yes, we might whiff on all three after lots of optimism we would land at least two. Still hoping Brunner goes with us, but I’m really hoping we pull off a great upset and get Rice’s commitment. The thought of Baker and Spindler and Fisher and Rice competing to start next year is damn near surreal. Hope Rice has an incredible visit this weekend and Makes the conversion!
I hope he pushes Lugg hard for the starting right tackle spot. I was high on Lugg until last season where I thought he struggled a lot when he substituted for guard and center. He has some back issues and he’s more natural at tackle. I like Baker a lot and I doubt he beats our Lugg, but it would be a great development if he has gained the needed strength and punch to do so.How do you feel about Baker, Telx?
How do you feel about Baker, Telx?
I think he was our number two target for center After Hinzman. Definitely a plan B, but a damn good prospect for center.We only offered after not landing our top guys. That matters too
We weren't even recruiting him a few months backI think he was our number two target for center After Hinzman. Definitely a plan B, but a damn good prospect for center.
Correct…we thought Hinzman was leaning our way.We weren't even recruiting him a few months back
Ski…agreed. He clearly did not look strong enough, nor Quick enough in the Spring game. That said, he was clearly one of our best linemen during the Spring, and I expect he’ll show significant improvement in both areas by the time Fall rolls around. Lugg is a talented tackle and he played out of position last year at guard and center. Plus, his back was problematic. Assuming he is totally healthy, he should be a very good right tackle for us, and if Baker were to beat him out, we would have an emerging star.I am hearing Baker is having difficulty with his feet and containing edge rushers otherwise pretty solid
Are you seriously saying this is a first round target? No this is after they whiffed on multiple OL on their visits now just getting bodies. Second year in underwhelming OL recruiting. But keep brining in the projects. Maybe we'll get lucky.11th rated by the staff ? Shouldn't their evaluations matter much more than those of some internet site ? Welcome young man.
Last year wasnt underwhelming. Fisher and Spindler are pretty much locks to be studs. Joe Alt has as much upside as anyone. Then they took 2 depth players. Still one of the best 5 classes in the country.Are you seriously saying this is a first round target? No this is after they whiffed on multiple OL on their visits now just getting bodies. Second year in underwhelming OL recruiting. But keep brining in the projects. Maybe we'll get lucky.
Disagree. They're not offering guys they don't think can develop. The cupboard is already overstocked. They didn't need another o lineman. Their opinion is more than good enough for me.We only offered after not landing our top guys. That matters too
I'm saying if the staff thinks he can play that's good enough for me. Could care less about the " stars" .Are you seriously saying this is a first round target? No this is after they whiffed on multiple OL on their visits now just getting bodies. Second year in underwhelming OL recruiting. But keep brining in the projects. Maybe we'll get lucky.
Rocco and Fisher could be day 1 starters. Underwhelming is incorrect.Are you seriously saying this is a first round target? No this is after they whiffed on multiple OL on their visits now just getting bodies. Second year in underwhelming OL recruiting. But keep brining in the projects. Maybe we'll get lucky.
He will be great for a center project. 3 years to develop.Underrated, athletic, quick off the line, great motor, plays with a chip, high upside, etc… are the things being said and written about this young man. He’ll get a tepid reception because he’s a three star and we’ve been reading about all the four star OL we’re recruiting, but I think folks will be pretty enthused after a stellar senior season playing at 20 lbs heavier and a solid four star rating. Welcome on board!
You are wrong. If Hinzman and Scrauth committed on their visits, Craig never gets offered.Disagree. They're not offering guys they don't think can develop. The cupboard is already overstocked. They didn't need another o lineman. Their opinion is more than good enough for me.
They also thought Brunell could play when most thought he couldnt. What happened?I'm saying if the staff thinks he can play that's good enough for me. Could care less about the " stars" .
Just an fyi all those players you mentioned in the NFL were not developed under Quinn.I am by no means an expert, but in looking at some of the tape on Ashton, I very much liked the fact that he looked quick and light on his feet. He moves really well for a big man, and I've read he has long arms for his height That bodes well for his development. Time will tell about his strength and ability to move people around against their will, but Balis is doing a nice job as the S&C coach, so I have faith Ashton will be coached up properly.
I'm not worried about Ashton's 3-star status. Our OL coaches have done a nice job of identifying and developing O-line talent. Look at the PFF list of the top 50 players currently playing in the NFL. ND has 4 former players on the list, including 3 O-lineman (Q (#4), Zack Martin (#13) and Ronnie Stanley (#46)). That is pretty damn impressive. The 4th ND player on the list is Harrison Smith (#32). I am going to trust the judgment of the coaching staff on Ashton's recruitment. Aside from ND, only OSU had 4 former players on the PFF50.
So by your standards we can never question any of the coaches or their decisions on recruits. We'll you, Bodi, and a handful of others can remain blind Homer's but that's not me. This was obviously a plan B guy and if you want to deny it that's on you.I'm saying if the staff thinks he can play that's good enough for me. Could care less about the " stars" .
I meant that when he gets to ND if he plays like a "3 star" he won't see the field. If the staff did a great job evaluating a prospect that was a "sleeper" and he's really nfl potential and his play is that of one you'd expect of a 4 or 5 star he has a chance to make an impact.So if his ranking changes expectations should too ?
Just an fyi all those players you mentioned in the NFL were not developed under Quinn.
He will be great for a center project. 3 years to develop.