BUMPDoes Louisville have any business being ranked ahead of Pitt? Who just blew them out…
BUMPDoes Louisville have any business being ranked ahead of Pitt? Who just blew them out…
That’s absolutely not true, the reason was that they wanted Bobby Bowden to win an NC, ND dominated FSU and there résumé’s were comparable !
Pitt dominated Louisville and won. Should they be ranked higher?Once again you prove that you’re totally in the dark when it comes to football and that you’re incapable of understanding context, the issue had to do with HEAD TO HEAD games NOT common opponents.
Have someone with a brain explain that to you !
Every comment I read on this site is negative about you. Does that ever enter your line of thinking? Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.Once again you prove that you’re totally in the dark when it comes to football and that you’re incapable of understanding context, the issue had to do with HEAD TO HEAD games NOT common opponents.
Have someone with a brain explain that to you !
I disagree. Once you've played over half the season, you have to start using resume more. And the voters are giving us credit for having a much tougher SOS than Louisville to this point. We've played 4 ranked teams and they've only played one. And they lost to a 2-4 team.Louisville outplayed us by such a wide margin that our respective résumé’s are irrelevant.
Head to head play is the defining metric, NOT someone’s speculation on resume’s
I think that had more to do with timing. If we'd dropped a game early in the season, I think we still pass FSU after beating them. But losing the week after caused the pollsters to drop us below them. Back in those days, if a team had one loss, the timing of the loss used to matter more than it seems to now.Exactly. The same reason FSU won the NC in '93.
ND had a better resume tha FSU in dud in 1993 I believeExactly. The same reason FSU won the NC in '93.
I think it had more to do with ND bias in the mediaI think that had more to do with timing. If we'd dropped a game early in the season, I think we still pass FSU after beating them. But losing the week after caused the pollsters to drop us below them. Back in those days, if a team had one loss, the timing of the loss used to matter more than it seems to now.
ND had a better resume tha FSU in dud in 1993 I believe
Should have definitely been split. Giving the full title was a huge mistakeNope. FSU faced a tougher overall SOS and defeated a higher ranked team (Nebraska) in their bowl game. The final vote wasn't close.
The final vote wasn't close due to media bias. End of the day, Notre Dame beat Florida St., and when two teams have the same record, that result, in and of itself, outweighs everything.Nope. FSU faced a tougher overall SOS and defeated a higher ranked team (Nebraska) in their bowl game. The final vote wasn't close.
They didn't have the same record. After ND's regular season was done, FSU defeated #7 Florida. And FSU played tougher teams overall. Go read the re-cap of the '93 season: wikiThe final vote wasn't close due to media bias. End of the day, Notre Dame beat Florida St., and when two teams have the same record, that result, in and of itself, outweighs everything.
Both had the same amount of losses. 1.They didn't have the same record. After ND's regular season was done, FSU defeated #7 Florida. And FSU played tougher teams overall. Go read the re-cap of the '93 season: wiki
You are arguing that Louisville should be higher ranked than ND.
I wouldnt have us ranked higher but would give a split NCBoth had the same amount of losses. 1.
I don't need to "re-read..." anything. I watched the FSU-Notre Dame game.
Bobby Bowden was a media favorite. That's why FSU was given the title, even after getting beat by Notre Dame late in the season. Notre Dame deserved to be ranked higher than FSU.
And yes, if I had a vote today, I would rank Louisville higher than Notre Dame. Same amount of losses, and Louisville beat Notre Dame.
I wouldnt have us ranked higher but would give a split NC
Both had the same amount of losses. 1.
I don't need to "re-read..." anything. I watched the FSU-Notre Dame game.
Bobby Bowden was a media favorite. That's why FSU was given the title, even after getting beat by Notre Dame late in the season. Notre Dame deserved to be ranked higher than FSU.
And yes, if I had a vote today, I would rank Louisville higher than Notre Dame. Same amount of losses, and Louisville beat Notre Dame.
Sometimes Patty you talk alot of sense. THIS!!! and then other times you lose me.... LOLThat’s absolutely not true, the reason was that they wanted Bobby Bowden to win an NC, ND dominated FSU and there résumé’s were comparable !
WTF? Really? ND beat them head to head, nothing else matters. They gave it booby b , the good ole boyNope. FSU faced a tougher overall SOS and defeated a higher ranked team (Nebraska) in their bowl game. The final vote wasn't close.
1. We shouldn't have been that low.If the idea that FSU was gifted a NC because people liked BB, that would have come from the coaches' poll. The AP doesn't tend to be terribly sentimental. ND at #4 defeated #7 A&M in their bowl. #1 FSU defeated #2 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl. What did you expect the voters to do following those bowl results?
You are right looked it upNope. FSU faced a tougher overall SOS and defeated a higher ranked team (Nebraska) in their bowl game. The final vote wasn't close.
“Every comment” ?Every comment I read on this site is negative about you. Does that ever enter your line of thinking? Your lack of self-awareness is astounding.
if you were around, contemporaneously, in 93, the sentiment for Bobby Bowden to win a NC was palpable.Sometimes Patty you talk alot of sense. THIS!!! and then other times you lose me.... LOL
But if Utah wins, do you come back and say that Vegas is flawed?# 14 Utah is a 7 point underdog to # 18 USC
Which indicates once again that the polls are significantly flawed !
Absolutely NOTBut if Utah wins, do you come back and say that Vegas is flawed?
Our does it only work one way?
If the idea that FSU was gifted a NC because people liked BB, that would have come from the coaches' poll. The AP doesn't tend to be terribly sentimental. ND at #4 defeated #7 A&M in their bowl. #1 FSU defeated #2 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl. What did you expect the voters to do following those bowl results?
Oh I get it, when it fits your narrative, you use itAbsolutely NOT
You’re too stupid to understand that Vegas isn’t perfect but in general they’re pretty accurate
So why don’t you take Utah straight up and I’ll take USC.
Cut a cashier’s check for $ 5,000 and I’ll do the same.
We can Fed-X it to ND in NJ.
Utah wins, you get both checks
USC wins I get both checks.
So big mouth, are you on ?
Disagree. The polls aren't intended to be a reflection of who would be favored in a matchup. Utah has a better resume than USC right now. They've beaten Florida and UCLA. USC's best win is Arizona.# 14 Utah is a 7 point underdog to # 18 USC
Which indicates once again that the polls are significantly flawed !
ND I'm sure was awarded the Title by some news organization. They should just pull a Bama and Claim it. It's funny how ESPn and the whole propaganda brigade will claim all those titles for Bama but not ND.1. We shouldn't have been that low.
2. I would have split the NC
Then you don’t understand the polls and you don’t understand VegasDisagree. The polls aren't intended to be a reflection of who would be favored in a matchup. Utah has a better resume than USC right now. They've beaten Florida and UCLA. USC's best win is Arizona.
The polls have nothing to do with the cfp committeeThen you don’t understand the polls and you don’t understand Vegas
The polls are supposed to rank the teams and determine which are the four (4) best teams for the purpose of qualifying for the CFP.
The pollsters are eminently unqualified to perform that task.
Vegas is the only eminently qualified entity to perform that task and they have no inherent biases !
Resumes and their evaluation are often subjective.Disagree. The polls aren't intended to be a reflection of who would be favored in a matchup. Utah has a better resume than USC right now. They've beaten Florida and UCLA. USC's best win is Arizona.
Then you don’t understand their influence on the committee!The polls have nothing to do with the cfp committee
I want the cfp committee picking the teams. I think they got it right every year pretty muchResumes and their evaluation are often subjective.
Vegas tells you who the better teams are.
So, do you want the four (4) best teams playing for the CFP or some pretenders picked by rank amateurs ?
I do understand it's zeroThen you don’t understand their influence on the committee!
No surprise there !
Yeah, they totally ignore the polls !I do understand it's zero