10 points.Leonard threw Two INT's which led to 14 PSU points, and here you are complaining about an almost fumble. What a tool.
10 points.Leonard threw Two INT's which led to 14 PSU points, and here you are complaining about an almost fumble. What a tool.
You’re the one making the comparison, not me. The OP is about Angeli, and my comments are about Angeli, saying he played exceptionally well except for the one play, which happens to illustrate what I think is his one weakness.Leonard threw Two INT's which led to 14 PSU points, and here you are complaining about an almost fumble. What a tool.
Again you're making assumptions about Angeli and you have no idea what you're talking about. You have no clue whether or not he has pocket presence. You bring up Ewers, he was asked about that, yet no one asked Angeli if he felt the pressure from the blindside. I can almost guarantee you he did, because if you actually look at that play, like the Ewers play, Angeli was getting ready to get rid of the ball, like Ewers, Angeli started his throwing motion, which is what caused the fumble in both instances. Each of them probably thought they had just enough time to get the ball off.You’re the one making the comparison, not me. The OP is about Angeli, and my comments are about Angeli, saying he played exceptionally well except for the one play, which happens to illustrate what I think is his one weakness.
Calm down Mrs Angeli.Again you're making assumptions about Angeli and you have no idea what you're talking about. You have no clue whether or not he has pocket presence. You bring up Ewers, he was asked about that, yet no one asked Angeli if he felt the pressure from the blindside. I can almost guarantee you he did, because if you actually look at that play, like the Ewers play, Angeli was getting ready to get rid of the ball, like Ewers, Angeli started his throwing motion, which is what caused the fumble in both instances. Each of them probably thought they had just enough time to get the ball off.
I suggest you learn more about football before you make idiotic assumptions.
It’s not an assumption, it’s an opinion. You disagree and think Angeli has good pocket presence. I think he is sack prone, and you apparently don’t. That’s fine and that’s why we visit here to express opinions and thoughts. I don’t feel the need to throw out terms like tool or idiotic, and you apparently do. That’s ok too as it doesn’t Faze me. We simply disagree on this point.Again you're making assumptions about Angeli and you have no idea what you're talking about. You have no clue whether or not he has pocket presence. You bring up Ewers, he was asked about that, yet no one asked Angeli if he felt the pressure from the blindside. I can almost guarantee you he did, because if you actually look at that play, like the Ewers play, Angeli was getting ready to get rid of the ball, like Ewers, Angeli started his throwing motion, which is what caused the fumble in both instances. Each of them probably thought they had just enough time to get the ball off.
I suggest you learn more about football before you make idiotic assumptions.