OT: Looks like the SEC isn't just overrated in football...
- By melstew
- Under the Dome
- 10 Replies
Four SEC to supers but agree they were extremely disappointing and the Committee gives them every benefit.
Over 80% of our commitments sign their NLOI. It's a small number that are decommitsUntil they sign the LOI, they are all free agents -- the only thing a "verbal" commitment says is -- here is the school you need to beat.
The vast majority of ND verbals never waver.Until they sign the LOI, they are all free agents -- the only thing a "verbal" commitment says is -- here is the school you need to beat.
100% correct 👍Until they sign the LOI, they are all free agents -- the only thing a "verbal" commitment says is -- here is the school you need to beat.
The seeding committee has an impossible job. Couch critics sit at home, wait for the games to be played, then shout you are wrong when everything does not go to form.Anything can happen in an individual game. The pattern across dozens of games tells a different story. A single bead dropped in a Galton Board can land anywhere. If the whole distribution goes off center, then something is definitely off.
Anything can happen in an individual game. The pattern across dozens of games tells a different story. A single bead dropped in a Galton Board can land anywhere. If the whole distribution goes off center, then something is definitely off.Nothing was off. It's baseball. You're seeded based on regular season performance. Once you get in the playoffs, anything can happen in that sport.
Nothing was off. It's baseball. You're seeded based on regular season performance. Once you get in the playoffs, anything can happen in that sport.The SEC has indeed been impressive in baseball. They deserve their billing as the top conference. The OP has a valid point, however, that the committee went overboard in giving them all the credit for this tournament.
ACC: 9 total entrants; 3 seeded teams (#5, #9, and #11); 5 teams advance to the super regionals
SEC: 13 total entrants; 8 seeded teams (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #10, #14); 4 teams advance to super regionals
Something was definitely off in the committee's overall evaluation of these two conferences.
Yeah. OK.Totally get that they have had the top team, but that doesn't mean they are 13 teams deep because they play each other. Last year, That was the principal objective for my OP. Also, Evansville took Tennessee to the very brink last year.
Totally get that they have had the top team, but that doesn't mean they are 13 teams deep because they play each other. That was the principal objective for my OP. Also, Last year Evansville took Tennessee to the very brink, before they were able to win it all.Tennessee, LSU, Mississippi, Mississippi State, and Vanderbilt have won the last 5 CBB titles.
I agree but it's not bloody likely.If they were smart, Stanford and CAL would rejoin. Add in St Marys, Pepperdine and LMU for non football and you have a decent conference. Better than multiple trips to the Atlantic.
Until they sign the LOI, they are all free agents -- the only thing a "verbal" commitment says is -- here is the school you need to beat.I've always hated early commitments. I wish there was some sort of truly enforceable rule that prohibited them until the fall of a kids senior season. I don't believe offers should be allowed until the spring of a players junior year either. Way too much pressure on these young people.
48 + 1 Independent 😝I still fully believe we are heading toward a two conference of 48 teams set-up.