Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is a republic not a democracy. If you don't know the difference you might want to look it up, and then you'll see what you desire will never happen, but there are plenty of other democracy that might welcome you
the interesting thing about Miller is that part of the case was incorrect in that the claim was made that shotguns were not a valid military weapon and yet were in great use by the US troops in WW1. Look up trench sweeper
and
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewt...sid=cc2acd13ba51102200679526ac6a2cc1&start=15
the interesting thing about Miller is that part of the case was incorrect in that the claim was made that shotguns were not a valid military weapon and yet were in great use by the US troops in WW1. Look up trench sweeper
and
https://forum.axishistory.com/viewt...sid=cc2acd13ba51102200679526ac6a2cc1&start=15
very few quality militaries have hand held automatic weapons. AK-47 is a fully automatic weapon but any soldier with a brain keeps it on semi auto.The Miller case is interesting. It would imply the full auto weapons should be allowed because they are of the type used by the military. No one believes that should happend .
very few quality militaries have hand held automatic weapons. AK-47 is a fully automatic weapon but any soldier with a brain keeps it on semi auto.
The more I research miller I understand why the SCOTUS revisited that issue - miller was a very flawed decision.
For there to be a militia they must have weapons IN THEIR HOME.
Therefore the right to individual possession of a firearm was UNDERSTOOD if not formally stated. Since the militia consists of all able bodied men 15-60 or however each state decreed, that was vital. One reason I believe that no one thought they HAD to make that clear.