Gerad Parker absolutely sucks. Pay good money for one, I’d take Tommy Rees over this shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Money isn’t an issue !Gerad Parker absolutely sucks. Pay good money for one, I’d take Tommy Rees over this shit.
I feel the same wayGerad Parker absolutely sucks. Pay good money for one, I’d take Tommy Rees over this shit.
I have to disagree!!!! ND is better.. a competent OC WOULD HAVE HAD ND OVER 500 yards and about 6 td's!!!More total yards than Clemson today. Would you also argue Clemson's OC should be fired?
Just a foolish position.
Money isn’t the issue !Gotta pay for them. Freeman wanted Ludwig. Swarbrick balked.
It's funny how it becomes that Swarbrick "balked" at paying up. My memory is that he thought they had a deal but that Ludwig got cold feet. I know you think you are the smartest guy in the room, but I really don't think Swarbrick would have gone to a hockey game with Freeman and Ludwig if he wasn't comfortable about the deal being as good as done. Maybe Ludwig just realized it would be a lot easier to coach at Utah, where everyone remembers when you beat USC but conveniently forget when you get trounced by Oregon.Gotta pay for them. Freeman wanted Ludwig. Swarbrick balked.
Total yards?? Talk about foolish positions. Jesus.More total yards than Clemson today. Would you also argue Clemson's OC should be fired?
Just a foolish position.
You are correct, it wasn’t a money issue !It's funny how it becomes that Swarbrick "balked" at paying up. My memory is that he thought they had a deal but that Ludwig got cold feet. I know you think you are the smartest guy in the room, but I really don't think Swarbrick would have gone to a hockey game with Freeman and Ludwig if he wasn't comfortable about the deal being as good as done. Maybe Ludwig just realized it would be a lot easier to coach at Utah, where everyone remembers when you beat USC but conveniently forget when you get trounced by Oregon.
No, it wasn’t, and I’m more informed than you on that subjectYes it was
👍All ND needs is an OC who consistently calls plays that gain a minimum of five or six yards each and every time.
Seriously, when I read the stuff that is posted here, I can't help but shake my head.
I'm not saying Parker is anywhere near the best OC around, but we have two other coaches on our staff with OC experience, so logic would dictate that our coaching staff does know something about offense.
In my fantasy world, there would be a feature where all the know-it-alls would get to call the plays and then see what the results would be. I think they'd be pretty abysmal.
I didn't watch the whole game today because it was a beautiful day and I kind of assumed we'd get the outcome we got. Did you guys really think ND was going to roll this team? If so, you know even less about football than I do.
I saw a game where our QB couldn't hit the portal if he was standing in it, where we had more turnovers than Clemson and where we failed to score TDs and settled for field goals in the first half.
Am I leaving anything out? Maybe the refs screwed us again.
Yes it was. It was reported by people who are much more informed than youNo, it wasn’t, and I’m more informed than you on that subject
The results of the Offense this yr has been " abysmal " . We're already in abysmal territory on Offense. Ignoring the obvious re Parker doesn't accrue brownie points in ND fan world. Parker earns a good chunk of change as OC . It's not money well spent. ND can and needs to do better in the OC position.All ND needs is an OC who consistently calls plays that gain a minimum of five or six yards each and every time.
Seriously, when I read the stuff that is posted here, I can't help but shake my head.
I'm not saying Parker is anywhere near the best OC around, but we have two other coaches on our staff with OC experience, so logic would dictate that our coaching staff does know something about offense.
In my fantasy world, there would be a feature where all the know-it-alls would get to call the plays and then see what the results would be. I think they'd be pretty abysmal.
I didn't watch the whole game today because it was a beautiful day and I kind of assumed we'd get the outcome we got. Did you guys really think ND was going to roll this team? If so, you know even less about football than I do.
I saw a game where our QB couldn't hit the portal if he was standing in it, where we had more turnovers than Clemson and where we failed to score TDs and settled for field goals in the first half.
Am I leaving anything out? Maybe the refs screwed us again.
Just like an upgrade at QB through the portal... if there is a great OC OUT THERE ... YOU TAKE HIM!!!!Parker isn't going anywhere. That's the worse thing a new head coach can do is panic.
B.S. Name them !Yes it was. It was reported by people who are much more informed than you
That was the game right there. More than the pick 6three red zone trips in the first half, no TDs -- that gave Clemson life... We need to rethink our offense (and if that means Parker moves back to TE coach, so be it.)
Bryan Driskell, Irish illustrated, irish sports dailyB.S. Name them !
No.Just like an upgrade at QB through the portal... if there is a great OC OUT THERE ... YOU TAKE HIM!!!!
I don't think getting rid of Parker is panicking considering Parker was filling the void left by Rees going to Bama and little time to get a quality OCParker isn't going anywhere. That's the worse thing a new head coach can do is panic.
Those are your sources ?Bryan Driskell, Irish illustrated, irish sports daily
It was already reported about 9 months ago. Go back and do your research and you'll find your answerThose are your sources ?
Okay, quantify the dollar difference that caused Ludwig to turn down the offer ?
Certainly those sources knew what Ludwig wanted and what Swarbrick offered, so what was the financial divide that killed the deal ?
If you and your sources don’t know the answer to that question, than you’re all just full of shit.
The fact is that neither you nor your sources know the answer but you won‘t admit it because you’re a fraud.
You're right. It was the "mechanics of the buyout".Money isn’t an issue !
Pat is a moron. Swarbrick said it himself.Yes it was. It was reported by people who are much more informed than you
We agree to disagree. You can't constantly change systems. The board was all over Golden and year 2 they are make big strides.I don't think getting rid of Parker is panicking considering Parker was filling the void left by Rees going to Bama and little time to get a quality OC
Swarbrick called me a moron ? ? ? ? 😜Pat is a moron. Swarbrick said it himself.
He said it was the mechanics of the buyout and then told everyone where they could donate to the athletics fund if they thought he wasn't being a good steward of NDs resources.
Smug bullshit glad he's(Swarbrick) leaving.
ND should have mixed in a RB draw or two as well from 0 TE formations. The Clemson DL seemed to be in full pass rush mode. That or the OL was bad.It blew my mind out Parker didn’t get Hartman out of the pocket. He was clearly uncomfortable and inaccurate throwing from the pocket today. Change it up, he seems to be better when improvising
I didn’t think that the OLine performed wellND should have mixed in a RB draw or two as well from 0 TE formations. The Clemson DL seemed to be in full pass rush mode. That or the OL was bad.
How do you know it wasn't the buyout or the contract amount?Swarbrick called me a moron ? ? ? ? 😜
Repeat, it was NOT about the amount of money Ludwig would be paid.
There was NO financial divide between offer and acceptance !
Golson5 is dead wrong and a fraud
Swarbrick was an outstanding AD