ND finds a way to screw that up. LOL!!!!!! Oh you can't make this stuff up.
Refs bail us out and....
- Thread starter Fifthhorseman25
- Start date
As soon as Jackson stepped up and grabbed I knew he was gone. Add the Kizer pick six and the route is now on. Kelly needs to go. Like now!!!
If it had been an incomplete pass then there was no loss yardage right? Ball should have been put back to the original line of scrimmage NOT where DK was tackled.
That was the wrong call. It was not indisputable evidence it was traveling backward. I have a feeling they will use that one in the off season for training. It was close, but they should have kept the call on the field.
How about the targeting call? I guess we are the only team you can target and get away with it.
I didn't think it was targeting. I thought it was a great tackle. I didn't word that too well and was in fact referring to last week's call as one that someone got away with.
Are you guys serious? You can see the gold flakes come off the helmet when he hitd Ced. It has to be egregious by rule to be called from the booth. It wasn't intentional but one of the clearest targetings I have ever seen.
Second only to the targeting of Hunter, Jr in the Texas game...oh, I forgot, that was not targeting....
My real point is that targeting could be called a dozen times in most games. I've seen Notre Dame players hit dozens of times like Fertita hit that guy and never seen it called once. If the USC player had not been knocked out they would not have called it, and throwing a player out of a game because a hit happened to knock an opponent out is a pretty stupid rule.
More egregious than the hit on Torii Hunter against Texas? According to you that hit, which was both hitting a defenseless player and helmet to helmet, wasn't egregious. Your guy wasn't defenseless. Care to clear up your contradictory assessments?
