So you expect Harbaugh to do better then 4th in his first year, without the roster he has been known to excel with. And didn't even get 1/2 a full recruiting cycle time to fill the holes he has? When he has Ohio State, MSU, PSU, all in division play, and Utah as a Thursday night game at Utah to open the entire NCAA season, let alone their own season, and BYU as the fourth game of the season. Michigan has a tough slate this year. Playing @Utah, Oregon State, UNLV, and BYU. All in their first 4 weeks. Then luckily has Ohio State and MSU at home, but still travels to Minni, and PSU.
At least you aren't setting the bar very high in the first year. I mean seriously Harbaugh is a good coach, but every where he has been it has taken a couple years for him to get his machine rolling. He was 0-2 vs ND until he had his players there and got the system he wanted. He then went 2-2 overall. But hey what do I know, I just wanted to make a flame thread right? It had nothing to do with the fact of seeing Harbaugh and Shaw play one another, when Shaw has said he is successful because of the lessons he learned from Harbaugh. And is considered a target for a NFL level job in the near future.
In Kelly's first year I was happy to see a winning record. And that was with a better roster then Michigan has for Harbaugh's first year, and a complete change in the system of defense, and most of the offense.
Again, finishing roughly where you expect to finish is not worth celebrating.
If 9-3 ND was paired against 10-2 Cincy, would you be thrilled because of the "neat" match up? My guess is most ND fans would not think that was "awesome".