Blah blah blah blahProgress was made with a few top targets (possibly 'silents' or strong leans).
Booker (DE) was a big target and ND got a good push there.
Selectivity will make it slow going. Fans see 4* and while it does get a boost to Team Recruiting rankings, all 4 stars are not the same. There is a wide range to 4 stars and a lot of them. A team can be rankied well up there and yet not have real playmakers or impact prospects on the list. Impact playmakers are the 'gems' that separate Top Classes. The goal is to shop at the top of the range. Competition will make it slow going.
Going into the game the prevailing thought was the maximum even possible number was 2 or 3, and nobody was even very confident of that. So the result pretty much met expectations. But we didn't seem to go backwards with anyone either.Are people surprised we didn't get any new commits coming out of the spring game?
Are people surprised we didn't get any new commits coming out of the spring game?
^ you also need to look at the targets for other teams to get an idea of who the realistic targets are.
Check UM, tOSU, USC, Bama, Ok , PSU targets and the CB's. Many ND top targets are common to these teams.
The always interesting oxymoron, "silent verbal". I have actually heard seemingly intelligent people use that phrase.I hear ND got 25 "silent" commits after B&G. Don't tell anyone.
Did you watch the 2016 season at all??????Are people surprised we didn't get any new commits coming out of the spring game?
You do realize that 12 kids who did, in fact, watch the 2016 ND season have already committed, right? And coming off a 3-9 season in 2007, where we looked 1000% worse than we did in going 4-8 last year, we put together the #2 ranked recruiting class in the country?Did you watch the 2016 season at all??????
How do you explain the 12 who have then ?Did you watch the 2016 season at all??????
Do not ruin the narrativeHow do you explain the 12 who have then ?
Are people surprised we didn't get any new commits coming out of the spring game?
ND offered DJ Johnson today. Love the offer. If he's the 4th best DB in a class of let's say Allen, Griffith, Gervin, Johnson, that would be a great haul.
Ever think Kelly's lack of support for Kizer is driving away recruits and it is surprising more players havent decommitted?
It's Putin and the Russians fault!Ever think Kelly's lack of support for Kizer is driving away recruits and it is surprising more players havent decommitted?
Nope. People appreciate the truth.Ever think Kelly's lack of support for Kizer is driving away recruits and it is surprising more players havent decommitted?
Kim Jong UnIt's Putin and the Russians fault!
No.Ever think Kelly's lack of support for Kizer is driving away recruits and it is surprising more players havent decommitted?
You are way off regarding kellys comments on kizer affecting recruiting. Way, way off.The Kizer comments will absolutely be used as negative recruiting tools; without doubt.
Any recruitor not using them is not using all the 'tools' in his tool belt and is probably not among the top recruitors for top 25 teams (meaning they are not recruiting vs ND). Over the years Kelly has provided opposing recruitors with an entire tool shed of tools!
'17 recruiting is off to a good start for ND; especially if one pays no sttention how other teams are doing. Finishing a class has been ND/Kelly's weakness.
And how many recruits have committed since it happened?You are way off regarding kellys comments on kizer affecting recruiting. Way, way off.
The Kizer comments will absolutely be used as negative recruiting tools; without doubt.
Any recruitor not using them is not using all the 'tools' in his tool belt and is probably not among the top recruitors for top 25 teams (meaning they are not recruiting vs ND). Over the years Kelly has provided opposing recruitors with an entire tool shed of tools!
'17 recruiting is off to a good start for ND; especially if one pays no sttention how other teams are doing. Finishing a class has been ND/Kelly's weakness.
And how many recruits have committed since it happened?
And how many recruits have committed since it happened?
Clearly you don't understand the process. I ve been advising kids through the recruiting process for over 20 years. Probably well over a hundred of them from my area. This has always been a slow time.And how many recruits have committed since it happened?
The effects are not something you can quickly or easily discern. An article was already written citing the use of the comments by negative recruitors. To blatently say it is not significant is nonsense because you can't be proven correct nor incorrect. What we know from experience is that recruitors do recruit the disadvantages of ND and the status of the staff. ND has enough obstacles w/o shooting themselves in the foot. And contrary to the alias ID above, I do follow recruiting and not just ND recruiting. When I make comments about recruiting and ND depth it is because I follow the annual talent grabs.