Then how did he average 7.1 yards per attempt ?And he kept making the wrong read on them … taking the pass Louisville was willing to give up, 3 yard outs or flare passes
Then how did he average 7.1 yards per attempt ?And he kept making the wrong read on them … taking the pass Louisville was willing to give up, 3 yard outs or flare passes
USC was 8-5 last year while ND was 10-3 and beat USC. Both teams are now 4-1. LSU hasn’t been particularly impressive and that was USC’s big win. Michigan got stomped by Texas and won some other close games. Are you saying you don’t see any equivalence in the caliber of those teams?
They all seem to be pretty darn equal other than the quality of loss.
O line issues plus a really limited QB. Denbrock doing the best he can.
Last years offense would have been significantly better with denbrock
I took your other post to mean more that you don’t think ND is really in the same area regarding the quality of USC and Michigan. Maybe that’s not what you meant. I haven’t seen much of the two teams other than USC/LSU, but I think their résumés are similar between the three schools.I watched a few USC games, including the loss to MI.
I think so far they look better than ND. They've got some issues, but I don't think coaching is a as fundamental an issue with the Trojans and Irish.
Again, I hope to be wrong...something which will play out the rest of the season.
If RL was only half as good as what you made him out to be......How many teams can do what Ga and Bama do? They're the 2 best programs in the country
If our OL was only half as good as last year maybe we can make a better assessmentIf RL was only half as good as what you made him out to be......
Coming into the season, the offense was projected to be the 10th best in the country (granted before all of the injuries on the offensive line).You are an idiot. First of all this scenario would never happen, because no one in this lifetime would ask you to be a football coach, because you know NOTHING about football. But, imagine your an OC, at the highest level of college football, with 3 starters out on the OL, a position group that was already your most questionable unit coming out of camp.
Try calling plays when your OL cannot consistently dip their pads and move people in the run game and then to make matters worse they struggle protecting the passer especially the left side, which is Riley's blind side. Then take in consideration your WR corp has no standouts, and your QB strugglse with consistency and accuracy throwing the football inside and outside the pocket
Denbrock deserves a raise for what he is doing, cobbling together an offense, and generating points. With the game on the line, MD kept a great pass play, and then a great screen play in his pocket then he dialed them up to give ND a 31-17 lead. That is big time play calling, and big time OC work. Not that you would know because you are F- dope
I don't know. I do think denbrock is really good, but i'm not sure he's doing great right now. Example, to start second half our D forces louisville into their only 3 and out and ND has a shot to really put this game away. We get the ball with great field position, then ND goes 3 and out. D stop them again, ND goes 3 and out, d stop them again, we get the ball back and are putting a good drive together. But on 4th and 2, we ran a QB power into 11 in the box. You must have a better play for short yardage 1-3 yard situations then that. That was a good play for 4th and 1, not 4th and 2-3.You are an idiot. First of all this scenario would never happen, because no one in this lifetime would ask you to be a football coach, because you know NOTHING about football. But, imagine your an OC, at the highest level of college football, with 3 starters out on the OL, a position group that was already your most questionable unit coming out of camp.
Try calling plays when your OL cannot consistently dip their pads and move people in the run game and then to make matters worse they struggle protecting the passer especially the left side, which is Riley's blind side. Then take in consideration your WR corp has no standouts, and your QB strugglse with consistency and accuracy throwing the football inside and outside the pocket
Denbrock deserves a raise for what he is doing, cobbling together an offense, and generating points. With the game on the line, MD kept a great pass play, and then a great screen play in his pocket then he dialed them up to give ND a 31-17 lead. That is big time play calling, and big time OC work. Not that you would know because you are F- dope
That's what I kind of think. I feel like saying Denbrock's been pretty masterfully, or at least effectively orchestrating this offense. RL really does seem like a poor passer for real. And yet we manage to squeeze a fair bit out of him, and when he does throw he's given plays that are more makable and ends up with a good completion %. I'd give him an A-. But I don't know much about play calling either.You are an idiot. First of all this scenario would never happen, because no one in this lifetime would ask you to be a football coach, because you know NOTHING about football. But, imagine your an OC, at the highest level of college football, with 3 starters out on the OL, a position group that was already your most questionable unit coming out of camp.
Try calling plays when your OL cannot consistently dip their pads and move people in the run game and then to make matters worse they struggle protecting the passer especially the left side, which is Riley's blind side. Then take in consideration your WR corp has no standouts, and your QB strugglse with consistency and accuracy throwing the football inside and outside the pocket
Denbrock deserves a raise for what he is doing, cobbling together an offense, and generating points. With the game on the line, MD kept a great pass play, and then a great screen play in his pocket then he dialed them up to give ND a 31-17 lead. That is big time play calling, and big time OC work. Not that you would know because you are F- dope
I agree the OL is a problem, however that doesn't excuse the weak arm/accuracy passing issues. Hes just not a good thrower, as a runner top notchIf our OL was only half as good as last year maybe we can make a better assessment
AgreeDenbrock has to be part of the bad play criticism. We have WRs a lot of times open. Oline banged up, i'll definitely give you that. He had a great first quarter plan to move the pocket. Louisville adjusted and dominated our offense the 2nd and third quarter. Denbrock made two great calls later in the fourth. It took him a long time to adjust to louisville line/lbs slanting to the obvious side we would be rolling or running riley too. We kept running plays into their pressure.
Well to be fair there was never any particularly strong grounds for thinking our offense was going to be that great. It was really the defense and a lot of hope. And RL is not really as advertised. He's almost a better runner, but definitely a shittier passer. And so we're just slogging through. To me it feels like the offensive play calling is pretty effective, all things considered. Of course you'd expect them to endeavor to cater to RL's shortcomings and failings, and they are. But can you hide them well enough, and keep the offense credible enough? So far so good, with one exception. And there could be more to come, as you allude to.I guess I'll go with the majority wisdom on Denbrock's capability. I'm not sold on him at all, but I have no illusions that I'm not an expert...and maybe it's really personnel issues? OL is important, possibly the explanation for an offense not playing very well.
I still feel he and MF, sorry to repeat this claim, have ND < the sum of the parts.
It will be interesting and fun following this the rest of the season. If you force me to predict, I say 2 more losses...probably no playoff.
One thing is for sure: ND just isn't there yet. Again, let's see if the Irish can get there...all eyes on MF, Denbrock, and the arm of RL.
You seem to be the only one defending Leonard’s passing. You also defended Buchner passing. So your assessment skills are not going to get respect. I think you are accurate assessing most things but you are flat out wrong on LeonardYou're nuts. All day to throw. Rewatch.
Your analysis when you drink is atrocious
No there's many people defending his play. Just read.You seem to be the only one defending Leonard’s passing. You also defended Buchner passing. So your assessment skills are not going to get respect. I think you are accurate assessing most things but you are flat out wrong on Leonard
He is not a passer. He is an athlete who can be decent passing. The Louisville qb is a passer. That guy threaded throws between coverage and had exceptional touch on long balls. Leonard cannot do that. And Leonard can’t find the open man unless the play is designed to get a guy open like the gresthouse n Harrison plays
I hope u r right.No there's many people defending his play. Just read.
He can throw when he has time to throw. The line has been bad and it is effecting the entire passing game