If Vegas picked based on teams most likely to beat all teams not in the top 4. If millions were at stake, they would do their due diligence and there would be no outside pressures. I feel like the committee is being swayed by the media and are worried about losing popularity. If money were at stake, there would be an unbiased, deeply researched decision for establishing the best top four at the end of the year. It would be without any care for outside feelings and simply based on the best for money's sake.
Here's my million dollars on the line for the best 4 and 6...
1. Alabama
2. Notre Dame
3. Clemson
4. MSU
5. Navy
6. Oklahoma
I put the Irish ahead of Clemson based on the fact that they had four turnovers and still nearly won the game. Played again I'd give a slight edge to ND. I put Alabama at #1 based on the eye test, talent, and coaching. I think MSU is on the rise. Navy hasn't been tested besides their loss to the second best team in America. They are also unorthodoxed and could beat a lot of teams not used to their style. Oklahoma has looked better as of late and they'd beat Iowa.
Here's my million dollars on the line for the best 4 and 6...
1. Alabama
2. Notre Dame
3. Clemson
4. MSU
5. Navy
6. Oklahoma
I put the Irish ahead of Clemson based on the fact that they had four turnovers and still nearly won the game. Played again I'd give a slight edge to ND. I put Alabama at #1 based on the eye test, talent, and coaching. I think MSU is on the rise. Navy hasn't been tested besides their loss to the second best team in America. They are also unorthodoxed and could beat a lot of teams not used to their style. Oklahoma has looked better as of late and they'd beat Iowa.
Last edited: