Kudos to Sark
- Thread starter mirer03
- Start date
I thought it was bad last week when they said that textbook spearing on the Buckeyes was not targetting.
But what just happened UT-Bama is worse. Bama is taking safety. A Horn defender brushes the qb with his arms before the qb is down. The Refs call roughing the passer with targeting, nullifying the safety.
But what just happened UT-Bama is worse. Bama is taking safety. A Horn defender brushes the qb with his arms before the qb is down. The Refs call roughing the passer with targeting, nullifying the safety.
The refs blew it even when they fixed it. At the very least it was grounding..
Last edited:
Sark calling a similar game to TR; 20 point underdog shortening the game and relying on his defense. They lead 13 - 10. The difference, he's at home.
Last edited:
There was a receiver in the area, although if he catches it he is tackled for a safety. Did they show if the qb was down before chucking it?
Intentional grounding is not reviewable (as to a no-call). Since the idiot ref thought it was targeting he didn't consider grounding and it can't be changed. It certainly was grounding.
I didn't see a reciver nor can I understand why one would be five yards deep in the end zone, five yard off the QB's left.
You have to really stretch the meaning of "in the area."
The rb goes out for a pass and takes a few steps back. Maybe if the QB isn't going down he can reach him. . .
They don't call him 7 win Sark for nothing....
I guess if he was going to start drinking again it would have been last year. And now they almost beat Alabama and should have beat Alabama. Maybe this gut-wrenching defeat will be the tipping point....
