ADVERTISEMENT

Irish Weak 2015 Schedule May Ruin Playoff Chances...

OK dude. Whatever. I was just showing you what the records say. In the 50s and 60s, MSU was a football power.
 
Why should conference champs host games? That's ridiculous.

I can understand your point of view being a fan of an independent school, you don't value conference championships because your team doesn't compete for one. Conference champions in 4 of the 5 leagues have to play 13 games including the beating another division champion in the conference championship game and that alone should earn them the right for 4 of them to host the first round games, because they are champions not just well regarded teams.

The remaining champion and three at large seeds could draw lots to see where they play which would minimize the politics. A committee would determine the weakest champion, which in some years would be obvious, and determine who the three at large bids are but the first round match ups could be left to chance, perhaps the visiting teams could select their opponent after drawing lots. For example if the Irish were chosen and had the right of selection they may wish to play the B1G champion in familiar surroundings or a more favorable match up than going to Alabama or a rematch in California with the PAC-12 champ. Having the visitors pick their poison would level the field somewhat.

If you don't want Notre Dame to be at a disadvantage join the ACC and earn the right to host by winning a championship. Right now in the 4 team playoff the Irish are at a disadvantage of their own choosing which may very well be worth it since independence and a national schedule are a cherished tradition. Adding four more teams and a first round would help level the field for the Irish in my opinion and provide equity to the leagues.
 
Again you are back, and your team still has an SOS 30+ points lower than ND's.
 
Well, they were 9-0 in 1951 and 1952. No way in 1955. Oklahoma was undefeated, and MSU had a loss to Michigan. 1957 they were 8-1 while OSU was 9-1. 1965 they got screwed. They were 10-1 while Alabama was 9-1-1. We all know what happened in 1966. Just based on those records, they have legitimate claims to a share of '51, '52, '65, and '66. That would give them a share of four titles.

Take your case to the NCAA they are the body that recognize these titles...
 
I am not interested enough in correcting you to find the link look for it yourself.

There is no link. The NCAA does not recognize national titles in division one football. That's why they are referred to as mythical national championships.
 
OK dude. Whatever. I was just showing you what the records say. In the 50s and 60s, MSU was a football power.

Thanks for the feedback. I apologize if you thought I was breaking your shoes.
Here's the NCAA list of champs...... my focus is more on someone calling themselves "boldsparky" and trying to convince us that it is a good.idea to give the B10 champ the opportunity to host a college playoff game....too funny....

http://www.ncaa.com/history/football/fbs
 
GT and USC are helping us out a bit today. ND needs UT and UVA to win a few.
I also expect MSU to lose 2 this year.
 
GT and USC are helping us out a bit today. ND needs UT and UVA to win a few.
I also expect MSU to lose 2 this year.
Stanford has to hold form tonight..... Washington put it to socal...Sark was croffled though.....
(Crocked/waffled)
 
Take a closer look. The titles refer to "selecting organization." Those champions were selected by the AP, UPI, etc.
Yep, and interestingly they choose to not list some of sparky's claims....
 
I can understand your point of view being a fan of an independent school, you don't value conference championships because your team doesn't compete for one. Conference champions in 4 of the 5 leagues have to play 13 games including the beating another division champion in the conference championship game and that alone should earn them the right for 4 of them to host the first round games, because they are champions not just well regarded teams.

The remaining champion and three at large seeds could draw lots to see where they play which would minimize the politics. A committee would determine the weakest champion, which in some years would be obvious, and determine who the three at large bids are but the first round match ups could be left to chance, perhaps the visiting teams could select their opponent after drawing lots. For example if the Irish were chosen and had the right of selection they may wish to play the B1G champion in familiar surroundings or a more favorable match up than going to Alabama or a rematch in California with the PAC-12 champ. Having the visitors pick their poison would level the field somewhat.

If you don't want Notre Dame to be at a disadvantage join the ACC and earn the right to host by winning a championship. Right now in the 4 team playoff the Irish are at a disadvantage of their own choosing which may very well be worth it since independence and a national schedule are a cherished tradition. Adding four more teams and a first round would help level the field for the Irish in my opinion and provide equity to the leagues.
How is this for you....? You have presented perhaps the dumbest idea for a college football playoff ever. It is failure on a grand scale. Then you outdid yourself by doing it on an ND board. Tell me why 2,3, or 4 loss conference champs should be in anything....? It is stupid....
 
so thinking out loud here... OSU wins out and beats MSU decisively. #1 seed.

lsu wins out and beats bama decisively. #2 seed

Clemson wins out. #3 seed.

Baylor loses to ok st and possibly TX with QB out. Tcu loses to ou decisively.

ND wins out. #4 seed.

not too farfetched.

I'm not sure ND can win that playoff, but the road got a lot easier today. we are the last team to beat LSU and would love a shot at Clemson when its dry...it would be fun to see.
 
How is this for you....? You have presented perhaps the dumbest idea for a college football playoff ever. It is failure on a grand scale. Then you outdid yourself by doing it on an ND board. Tell me why 2,3, or 4 loss conference champs should be in anything....? It is stupid....

Okay, but if the Irish win out and get passed over by 4 league champs including multiple 1 loss teams because you only play 12 and don't have allies with an interest in your success my proposal may not seem as crazy. Annually ND has a much better chance of competing for 1 of the 3 at large bids in an 8 team system against conference also rans than it does forcing a second conference champ to stay home in the 4 team formula we have today. I want four of the teams to host the first round so it is the college fan crowd not a corporate event. As I stated before I believe it equitable to have 4 of the champions host the first round games since they survived the elimination process of league play not some committe's arbitrary ranking. To get all five champs in the playoffs every give substantial independents like Notre Dame and BYU and worthy conference also rans a path to the championship I think the field needs to be expanded to 8.
 
Last edited:
Okay, but if the Irish win out and get passed over by 4 league champs including multiple 1 loss teams because you only play 12 and don't have allies my proposal may not seem as crazy. Annually ND has a much better chance of competing for 1 of the 2 at large bids in an 8 team system against conference also rans than it does forcing a second conference champ to stay home in the 4 team formula we have today.
Your proposal is not linked to.any semblance of rational thought. Explain why a 2, 3 or 4 loss ,conference champ should be afforded anything. I previously linked the past big 10 champs year to year. Some of the past champ records are abysmal and not worthy of NC/playoff consideration...... that's part of the flaw....
 
so you do realize 95% of the eligible conference champs play at least one lower division game. ND does not. The committee will take into account the wins in notre dames 12 div 1 games and weight that against your power conference teams 11 div 1 games and 2 (in the sec anyways)lower division games.

you do realize conference title games are about money not substance right? No one gives two craps how many sec or Pac 12 titles a team has. They serve no purpose other then increasing the money and the allure of a power five conference.
 
ND has a tougher row to hoe earning a playoff bid playing only 12 games without a chance to win a league title or conference championship game but your recent scheduling changes have also hurt your chances in my opinion. Clearly ND attempted to build a tough 2015 schedule but ND's schedule looks much weaker now than at the beginning of the season. GA Tech and the UVA on your schedule in place of a once again respectable Michigan and top 10 MSU really hurt ND's strength of schedule. Texas is weak and USC mediocre at best at 3-3 after firing their coach compounding ND's problem.


Clemson is the only quality opponent ND has faced yet. Obviously the Clemson loss is respectable but Stanford, Temple and Pitt are the only remaining teams that appear to be worthy competition on the schedule. I think it will be very tough for the committee to justify awarding a bid to an 11-1 ND over a 12-1 conference champion or even a 12-1 division champion. In the grand scheme of things your ACC alliance and national scheduling make sense for Notre Dame but if an 11-1 Notre Dame team misses the party it will be on Notre Dame not the committee.


Now before you fire back with MSU's schedule has not been so strong either let me say I agree. Oregon is having a down year so what looked like a major accomplishment in week two isn't as impressive now. Michigan is the only quality team State as beaten thus far but MSU will have beat IU, MD, and NE before facing #1 Ohio State and finish with are respectable if not tough Penn State for the right to face what I expect to be an undefeated and top 10 Iowa team in the B1G championship game. MSU is riddled with injuries and will have to get a lot healthier over its bye week to have any kind of chance, but at least they know winning out will earn them a bid whereas I think Notre Dame is probably already is out of it.

BOLD
You are usually fair and money but this time I call BS on you.. ND picks its schedule for difficulty The teams we schedule typically are top flight. There is no way to know that one of these teams will have a down year. Example- USC is always tough but are struggling until now and they are looking very good now Pitt was thought to be an easy game this year although they are usualoly pretty good and instead of sucking, they are 5-1

Contrast ND's sched with OSU.. Joke. I think if we beat Stanford we will be in playoffs.
 
Last edited:
BOLD
You are usually fair and money but this time I call BS on you.. ND picks its schedule for difficulty The teams we schedule typically are top flight. There is no way to know that one of these teams will have a down year. Example- USC is always tough but are struggling until now and they are looking very good now Pitt was thought to be an easy game this year although they are usualoly pretty good and instead of sucking, they are 5-1

Contrast ND's sched with OSU.. Joke. I think if we beat Stanford we will be in playoffs.
Did you miss the sentence that started out "Clearly ND attempted to build a strong 2015 schedule..."?

I think Va Tech looked tough when OSU scheduled them years ago. Ohio State just beat a respectable Penn State team, will be playing Michigan that is currently ranked 15, MSU that is currently 8-0 and ranked 4 in one of the polls and if the Buckeyes win the Eastern Division will probably play an undefeated and very solid Iowa team that is ranked 12 now but looks destined to run the table in the weak Western Division and be a top 10 team in the conference title game.

Ohio State schedule will look fine the end of the year if it runs the table as will MSU's if we get healthy enough to get by Nebraska, Ohio State and Penn State. If Iowa wins out they glide into the playoffs as well, it looks like B1G will send an undefeated champion in one of these. three. With in injury to Baylors QB I think TCU runs the table locking up the second bid leaving ND to hope that two of ACC, PAC-12 or SEC champs have two losses. You do have and opportunity to help create that eventuality if you knock off Pitt and Stanford and they go on to win their leagues. Maybe the SEC Champ has two losses but that doesn't likely to me, I think LSU or Alabama wins it with 1 loss.
 
Anyone that says ND plays a weak schedule or needs to join a conf is a moron. Welcome to the ignore bin.
 
Big10 trolls are weak and scared. They know they don't deserve to be in the playoff.

ND has a weak schedule you say? Who beat 13th ranked Oklahoma? Texas. Who just crushed #3 Utah? USC. Who shocked no. 9 Florida State? Georgia Tech. You get the drift? All those teams that won those games recently, were beaten by ND. Now, ND is going on the road in back-to-back weeks against top-25 teams and finish up at top-10 Stanford.

Boldsparty, you're delusional.
 
I highly doubt that. What if Clemson is undefeated ACC champion? An SEC team will get in for sure. A BIG team will likely get in unless you get all sorts of late upsets. I doubt the committee will snub the Big 12. So that leaves PAC and ND on outside looking in.
- SEC won't get in if the conference champ has two losses.
- Committee snubbed Big 12 last year, didn't they?
 
Careful, he's bold. Maybe he can explain this math.... What a total joke.....

"Michigan State claims a total of six national championships (1951, 1952, 1955, 1957, 1965, and 1966); the AP Poll voted Michigan State as national champion one time (1952). They have been named named national champions twice in the Coaches Poll (1952 and 1965)."
Michigan also has all this fake NC painted all over the stadium - Guess they try to out do each other in make belief NC's as well.
 
Michigan also has all this fake NC painted all over the stadium - Guess they try to out do each other in make belief NC's as well.

Check out this number if we did "their math". I wonder what boldsparky thinks of this...

http://www.cfbdatawarehouse.com/data/active/n/notre_dame/all_national_champs.php

This is a great 'bama video on their bs titles. Unfortunately, the music was taken down, but the content is excellent.

<iframe width="854" height="480" src="" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
ND has a tougher row to hoe earning a playoff bid playing only 12 games without a chance to win a league title or conference championship game but your recent scheduling changes have also hurt your chances in my opinion. Clearly ND attempted to build a tough 2015 schedule but ND's schedule looks much weaker now than at the beginning of the season. GA Tech and the UVA on your schedule in place of a once again respectable Michigan and top 10 MSU really hurt ND's strength of schedule. Texas is weak and USC mediocre at best at 3-3 after firing their coach compounding ND's problem.


Clemson is the only quality opponent ND has faced yet. Obviously the Clemson loss is respectable but Stanford, Temple and Pitt are the only remaining teams that appear to be worthy competition on the schedule. I think it will be very tough for the committee to justify awarding a bid to an 11-1 ND over a 12-1 conference champion or even a 12-1 division champion. In the grand scheme of things your ACC alliance and national scheduling make sense for Notre Dame but if an 11-1 Notre Dame team misses the party it will be on Notre Dame not the committee.


Now before you fire back with MSU's schedule has not been so strong either let me say I agree. Oregon is having a down year so what looked like a major accomplishment in week two isn't as impressive now. Michigan is the only quality team State as beaten thus far but MSU will have beat IU, MD, and NE before facing #1 Ohio State and finish with are respectable if not tough Penn State for the right to face what I expect to be an undefeated and top 10 Iowa team in the B1G championship game. MSU is riddled with injuries and will have to get a lot healthier over its bye week to have any kind of chance, but at least they know winning out will earn them a bid whereas I think Notre Dame is probably already is out of it.

First... I am only worried about Notre Dame winning this coming game against a good Temple team. Second... for fan of a team in the Big10 to talk smack about strength of schedule is very funny.

Either way I actually hope you guys beat Ohio St. but I don't think it will happen. You guys will either barely beat them, which is fine with me just like with Michigan, or you will get smacked by 20+ which is what I think will happen. Then you can come back and talk about playoffs since according to you neither of our programs, if we both finish with 1 loss, would have a shot lol.

Again, I will take 11-1 and a win in a big bowl game any year and especially one where our team loses its starting QB, DE, and both RB's before the season started (Zaire of course second game but close enough for a first year starter) Go Irish!!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT