Interesting stat from TOS.....

[cgvr]

"Since the AP poll originated in 1936, the only ND coaches not to beat at least one top 5 team at the time of the game have been Kuharich, willingham, and kelly."

 

[zonairish]

dude this is getting so old

 

[BGI User 1596]

Kelly will get to try at least 6 more times in his career at ND if the schedules pan out.

 

[Pennick4]

dude this is getting so old

He is mad because Kelly wouldn't sign his male cheerleader outfit from the 70's.

 

[pumpbeef]

"Since the AP poll originated in 1936, the only ND coaches not to beat at least one top 5 team at the time of the game have been Kuharich, willingham, and kelly."

your wrong about Kuharich..Better check you facts or get some new drinking pals that tell you this BS...

 

[cgvr]

your wrong about Kuharich..Better check you facts or get some new drinking pals that tell you this BS...

Well, that would make kelly look worse. I doubt the source from the other site is wrong though......
PS You are wrong about "your".

 

[TheDecker]

"Since the AP poll originated in 1936, the only ND coaches not to beat at least one top 5 team at the time of the game have been Kuharich, willingham, and kelly."

Interesting.

Why do you choose to look at "Top5 at the time of the game" instead of "Top5 in final rankings"?

Also, why Top5 instead of Top10??

We all know the answer to both of these questions are "becuAse it fits my narrative"...but I'm interested in hearing your justification

 

[cgvr]

Interesting.

Why do you choose to look at "Top5 at the time of the game" instead of "Top5 in final rankings"?

Also, why Top5 instead of Top10??

We all know the answer to both of these questions are "becuAse it fits my narrative"...but I'm interested in hearing your justification

Re-read the original post. That will help you.

 

[TheDecker]

Re-read the original post. That will help you.

Lol, referencing a post on another message board...

Again, we all know why you. Hide to put this random post here, instead of looking at something actually meaningful

Sorry your agenda has been completely exposed for the idiot mission that it is

 

[TheDecker]

Again...

Why do you choose to look at "Top5 at the time of the game" instead of "Top5 in final rankings"?

Also, why Top5 instead of Top10??

We all know what the answer is...and that you have absolutely no defense

 

[wicker]

The proper approach is ranking at the time of the game. Kelly is 0-3, counting a hosing at FSU (I trust cvgr didn't scream about bad calls in that game).

Willingham once lost to the #5 team 3 times in one year (Mich, FSU, SC)

 

[twalsh]

The proper approach is ranking at the time of the game. Kelly is 0-3, counting a hosing at FSU (I trust cvgr didn't scream about bad calls in that game).

Willingham once lost to the #5 team 3 times in one year (Mich, FSU, SC)

"Lost" doesn't come close to telling that story. 38-0, 45-14 & 37-0. 120-14 for those keeping score at home.