Sure, who cares about 20 years ago. Point is. Times have changed. There really is not much difference in Rocket's second place finish to an undeserving byu guy than the talent Fuller brings in 2015 except:
1 speed is about same, maybe Rocket had a split sec more
2 fuller is a better receiver
3 rocket was the master of vision, and could punt or kick return one to the house every touch
4 punt returners had more time to return back in 91
5 fuller is not used in these other roles but if he was, he would be in the Heisman conversation. Apparently, coaches today play it safe and don't risk losing their star
What would happen today if Tim brown or rocket were on the 2015 team? Would they be one dimensional or allowed to get the ball as much as Lou gave it to them?
Interesting question. If fuller was on one of Lou's teams, would he be in the Heisman conversation?
Which coaching philosophy is right?
1 speed is about same, maybe Rocket had a split sec more
2 fuller is a better receiver
3 rocket was the master of vision, and could punt or kick return one to the house every touch
4 punt returners had more time to return back in 91
5 fuller is not used in these other roles but if he was, he would be in the Heisman conversation. Apparently, coaches today play it safe and don't risk losing their star
What would happen today if Tim brown or rocket were on the 2015 team? Would they be one dimensional or allowed to get the ball as much as Lou gave it to them?
Interesting question. If fuller was on one of Lou's teams, would he be in the Heisman conversation?
Which coaching philosophy is right?
Last edited: