ADVERTISEMENT

Finally academics has a place in college football.....

Fifthhorseman25

Posts Like A Champion
Sep 2, 2003
4,016
1,124
113
After a bad season on the field for Mike Riley's first Nebraska team, some good work in the classroom by the Huskers when Bo Pelini was coach will keep Big Red playing football this season.

AdChoices
Missouri, however, will pass on a chance to play in a bowl game with a 5-7 record.

The NCAA Division I council approved a plan Monday that will make teams with 5-7 records eligible for at least two bowl bids -- and as many as five -- based on their Academic Progress Rates.

The council approved a recommendation made by the football oversight committee that was necessary to fill the record 40 bowls after not enough teams met the standard bowl-eligibility requirements.

There are 75 teams with at least six victories and a .500 record going into the final weekend of the regular season. Eighty are needed. Only three more -- Kansas State, Georgia State and South Alabama -- can get to six wins. All three are underdogs in their games.

Based on 2013-14 scores, the latest available, Nebraska has the best APR among 5-7 teams at 985. Pelini, who was fired after last season, was the Huskers coach back then.

The Cornhuskers finished their first season under Riley last Friday with a loss to Iowa, but Nebraska has indicated it will accept a bid if invited.

Missouri is next on the list with an APR of 976, but moments after the NCAA announced that the Tigers would have a chance to play in the postseason athletic director Mack Rhoades released a statement saying the team will not participate.

"Our focus remains on identifying the right leader for our program and moving forward with the transition process," Rhoades said.

Missouri is in the process of trying to find a replacement for retiring coach Gary Pinkel, who announced two weeks ago that he was stepping down at the end of the season because he has lymphoma.

Kansas State can become bowl eligible Saturday at West Virginia, but with a 976 APR, the Wildcats could get in either way.

Kansas State coach Bill Snyder said earlier in the day that he would let the players decide if they wanted to participate in a bowl game at 5-7 after playing West Virginia.

The next four teams are Minnesota (975), San Jose State (975), Illinois (973) and Rice (973).

In a statement, San Jose State University interim president Dr. Susan Martin and athletic director Gene Bleymaier said they would "support an opportunity to participate in a bowl game if invited."

The other three schools were still unsure if the teams would play in a bowl if invited.

"Illinois will continue to monitor the situation and, when appropriate, talk with the Big Ten Conference office and Illinois staff before making a decision," the school said in a statement.

The selection process will be market driven and allow the bowls with spots to fill to invite the 5-7 team that makes the most sense for its game -- as long as the selection is made in order of best available APR. So Illinois can't be invited until San Jose State is invited.

Bowl organizers prefer teams in their region so fans can drive to the game and Big Ten bowls are bound to be looking for teams. The conference has nine bowl agreements, including the Rose Bowl, plus it is likely to send a team to the College Football Playoff and maybe one more to a third New Year's Six game. The Big Ten has only eight bowl-eligible teams.

In a release, the NCAA said the football oversight committee is planning to form a task force in January to study bowl eligibility in the future.



Go to MSN Home
Go to MSN Sports
 
No disrespect to this but REALLY?

A lot of folks complain to no end that if you add more teams to a playoff it lowers the drama factor. Wtfe.....

But we are basically going to reward losing teams because they are doing what they are supposed to do. ?! No thanks.

How about we make part of the playoff criteria academics. Now we are talking and you would see a lot of these napkin passing out diploma schools start doing the right thing.
 
No disrespect to this but REALLY?

A lot of folks complain to no end that if you add more teams to a playoff it lowers the drama factor. Wtfe.....

But we are basically going to reward losing teams because they are doing what they are supposed to do. ?! No thanks.

How about we make part of the playoff criteria academics. Now we are talking and you would see a lot of these napkin passing out diploma schools start doing the right thing.

I dunno 88, I think it's a great solution to the lack of eligible bowl teams. For a brief moment anyway, it puts a spotlight on academics for these teams.

BTW, great game Irish fans. Another nail-biter, just like the last three. I think I'm going to have to put my cardiologist on speed dial before the game in South Bend next year. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nemeth#5
I agree. If someone needs to fill the void it is great to see some emphasis being put on academics. I believe a certain number should be established, no less tha 70% grad rate, and if not attained a bowl invitation would not be tendered.
 
I'm an old guy. I tend to watch a limited number of games. The originals(Rose, Sugar, Cotton,Orange). Plus the ones, ND, NIU and NU play in. Thats about it. 40 games is way too many.
 
I
I'm an old guy. I tend to watch a limited number of games. The originals(Rose, Sugar, Cotton,Orange). Plus the ones, ND, NIU and NU play in. Thats about it. 40 game

s is way too many.

I like watching the games so:

A - I agree it good to see academics get rewarded

B - let's hope for a good match up, and a good game.
 
I dunno 88, I think it's a great solution to the lack of eligible bowl teams. For a brief moment anyway, it puts a spotlight on academics for these teams.

BTW, great game Irish fans. Another nail-biter, just like the last three. I think I'm going to have to put my cardiologist on speed dial before the game in South Bend next year. :)
I guarantee you wouldn't be posting GG comments in here if Stanford lost.
 
I have seen a lot of debate going on over this. Especially on Facebook because 90% of my friends are Husker fans. A lot are saying they should not be rewarded for a losing season, and I get that. But on the other hand every Husker fan will watch the bowl game and hope for victory. It isn't like we will forget that they went 5-7 and reward them because they won a crappy Tuesday afternoon bowl game. I say let them play as many games as they want, there will always be viewers (especially for a program like Nebraska) and because of that there will always be sponsors.

If anyone doesn't like it, they do not have to watch.
 
I have seen a lot of debate going on over this. Especially on Facebook because 90% of my friends are Husker fans. A lot are saying they should not be rewarded for a losing season, and I get that. But on the other hand every Husker fan will watch the bowl game and hope for victory. It isn't like we will forget that they went 5-7 and reward them because they won a crappy Tuesday afternoon bowl game. I say let them play as many games as they want, there will always be viewers (especially for a program like Nebraska) and because of that there will always be sponsors.

If anyone doesn't like it, they do not have to watch.

Exactly. The reason that there are so many bowls is because they make money for the networks, advertisers and host cities. It is the free market filling a desire. I watch all kinds of crappy bowls because I prefer college football to most other programming.
 
Exactly, that's why MAC plays on Tuesday. I always watch those games....even though they are usually atrocious.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT