Good example if a total miss in his ranking. We finally have a real nose tackle!
Another post from the trollanother guy ranked down in the 900s ...
are we back in the ty willingham era?
Damn good get. Auburn, Miami, OSU and a slew of others. He is already 315lbs and growing. All ND needs is the kid from Chicago and DL is on it’s way to being eliteGood example if a total miss in his ranking. We finally have a real nose tackle!
Yes, Scott would make this a great class. And there’s another DE that we are still recruiting That would be a definite take if he committed. Kid from Texas, I think (Rushing?)Damn good get. Auburn, Miami, OSU and a slew of others. He is already 315lbs and growing. All ND needs is the kid from Chicago and DL is on it’s way to being elite
ArizonaYes, Scott would make this a great class. And there’s another DE that we are still recruiting That would be a definite take if he committed. Kid from Texas, I think (Rushing?)
Ouch!another guy ranked down in the 900s ...
are we back in the ty willingham era?
another guy ranked down in the 900s ...
are we back in the ty willingham era?
“Those weren’t committable offers” - ChaseYeah, this is a classic “look at the offer list” versus ranking bud. He’ll be moving up. No doubt
I dont know why anybody would look at offer lists in 2023. Everybody offers everybody these days. Only thing that matters is whether the offer is actionable or not and we have no way to tell for sure.Yeah, this is a classic “look at the offer list” versus ranking bud. He’ll be moving up. No doubt
Does the tune change when 3 stars become 4 like Kyle Hamilton? Ever consider the recruiting and offer list requires recruiting services to re-evaluate? Happens a lotI dont know why anybody would look at offer lists in 2023. Everybody offers everybody these days. Only thing that matters is whether the offer is actionable or not and we have no way to tell for sure.
Best objective indicator we have an a prospect is his composite ranking.
" objective " ? Wow, that's quite naive.I dont know why anybody would look at offer lists in 2023. Everybody offers everybody these days. Only thing that matters is whether the offer is actionable or not and we have no way to tell for sure.
Best objective indicator we have an a prospect is his composite ranking.
You aren't objective regarding anything related to Notre Dame Football. LMAO at this shit post.I dont know why anybody would look at offer lists in 2023. Everybody offers everybody these days. Only thing that matters is whether the offer is actionable or not and we have no way to tell for sure.
Best objective indicator we have an a prospect is his composite ranking.
I think adding either makes it one of our better recent DL’s. But yes, both would make it elite.We have a solid dline class now, Scott and rushing would make it great.
As for play, our dline has a ton of talent some experienced and some young. They should excel at getting to the qb as a unit and making tfl. Let’s see it!
Think about this. Rivals is asked to evaluate HS sophomore, junior, and senior football players, and then rank them as potential college football players.The simple fact that the rating services are flawed. The only rating that matters is still over another year away. The only way anybody can tell is by looking at the offer list consistently leaning toward the heavy hitters wheather or not they are committable or not. I believe MF and staff go by measurables and film on a lot of occasions. I know for a fact high school coaches actually tip off colleges about players that might be a good fit for ND
It's an impossible task that they do not do themselves. They use college recruiting staffs to help them... There is a reason kids recruited by Alabama and Texas get bumps... Namely they have HUGE athletic departments doing research that the reporting agencies could never dream of.Think about this. Rivals is asked to evaluate HS sophomore, junior, and senior football players, and then rank them as potential college football players.
It's an impossible task to be perfect, or even close to perfect.