Just me or does the top 12 in F+ look like a legit playoff with the best ~12 or so teams in the country vs that of the CFP playoff committee's top 12? I'd be way more interested in seeing how F+'s tournament bracket would play out than that of the official CFP committee's top 12/playoff bracket this year.
I feel like too many good teams are being penalized too severely for losses in really competitive games vs really competitive conference opponents and its going to start incentivizing programs to schedule more watered down seasons vs crap opponents to pad the W-L record and avoid potential losses on the final record.
PS I apologize for the poor formatting, just did some quick copy and paste jobs to get the information in one place.
CFP Top 12
1 Oregon 9-0
2 Ohio State 7-1
3 Georgia 7-1
4 Miami 9-0
5 Texas 7-1
6 Penn State 7-1
7 Tennessee 7-1
8 Indiana 9-0
9 BYU 8-0
10 Notre Dame 7-1
11 Alabama 6-2
12 Boise State 7-1
vs
I feel like too many good teams are being penalized too severely for losses in really competitive games vs really competitive conference opponents and its going to start incentivizing programs to schedule more watered down seasons vs crap opponents to pad the W-L record and avoid potential losses on the final record.
PS I apologize for the poor formatting, just did some quick copy and paste jobs to get the information in one place.
CFP Top 12
1 Oregon 9-0
2 Ohio State 7-1
3 Georgia 7-1
4 Miami 9-0
5 Texas 7-1
6 Penn State 7-1
7 Tennessee 7-1
8 Indiana 9-0
9 BYU 8-0
10 Notre Dame 7-1
11 Alabama 6-2
12 Boise State 7-1
vs
F+ Top 12 | ||
1 | Ohio State | 2.26 |
2 | Oregon | 2.19 |
3 | Georgia | 2.02 |
4 | Ole Miss | 2 |
5 | Texas | 2 |
6 | Alabama | 1.89 |
7 | Miami | 1.69 |
8 | Penn State | 1.68 |
9 | Notre Dame | 1.67 |
10 | Tennessee | 1.62 |
11 | Indiana | 1.57 |
12 | LSU | 1.45 |
Last edited: