If it’s any consolation, this has happened before.
George Gipp’s ND teammate – and roommate, the season he passed away – FRANK THOMAS, went on to become one of the TIDE’s all-time great coaches, compiling an 81% winning percentage over 15 seasons, including two NC’s and four bowl victories.
There were only four bowl games in those years – Rose, Sugar, Cotton and Orange – and the only one Thomas didn’t win was the Sugar.
ON THE OTHER HAND, both Justin Tuck and Melvin Dansby, both heralded prep players from Alabama, attended Notre Dame, not Alabama. Tuck was great and Dansby might have been had injuries not slowed him down.
As for now, I don’t see the ND to Alabama trend continuing. In fact, if Rees hadn’t gone to Alabama, I’m not sure Buchner would even be considering it – though WHO CAN BE SURE?
As for Kelly, I think it was simple. He saw GREATER OPPORTUNITY AT LSU and a SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER CHANCE at winning an NC.
Still, what each of these recent moves tell me is that while ND can ASSEMBLE VALUABLE PARTS, which are in turn desirable to other programs, the ND ACADEMIC ETHOS/MINDSET prevents ND from combining the SUM OF THOSE PARTS into a SUCCESSFUL WHOLE as there are never quite enough KEY PARTS.
And when I say SUCCESSFUL, I mean as in annual NC contender in the LATER ROUNDS.
It’s the same old story. ND insists on serving the gods of ACADEME while also attempting to serve FOOTBALL CAESAR.
But it’s an ACT OF FAITH too far, especially when spiked with FANBASE HOPIUM.
As for Freeman’s role? He’s just the latest Manchurian Candidate – a latter-day Brennan or Faust, though multiculturally UPGRADED – to keep people from thinking that more than simply HOPING FOR THE BEST is what’s happening.
If that sounds cynical, let me put it this way. If I were a CAPITAL PROVIDER – which I’ve been – I wouldn’t give any to ND based on what appears to be its CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN. Don’t like the risk/reward profile for what ND claims as its MISSION.
But I'd give BAMA a FAT LINE OF CREDIT.