The recruiting rankings formula already deemphasizes the amount of overall points a class gets for high quantity. Basically most of your class ranking is attributed to the top 15-20 players in a class.
Also, in the transfer era, having freshman prospects you can develop for 3-4 years in your program is more valuable than having smaller classes with the rest of your roster filled with 1-year stopgaps (especially when your program isn't competing for a national title)
Smaller classes = higher per player average.
All of this is taken into account in the class ranking formula.
Basically your overall class score relative to all other programs is the best indicator of class quality no matter how much ND fans love to cherry pick information that helps increase the perception of their class.
Also, we're quibbling over ranking spots way back in the 10th-12th range when there are still too many competing programs recruiting in another tier entirely and completely monopolizing the top 50/top 100
- RECRUITING MUST GET BETTER AT NOTRE DAME
- TALENT ACQUISITION MUST GET BETTER AT NOTRE DAME
HOW MANY MORE YEARS (& DECADES) OF EVIDENCE DO WE NEED ?