ND cannot have access to the ACC champ game unless it's a football member of the conference. Being a member of the ACC for football will make ND a member of the conference in totality. Language in the current ACC contract that binds all members requires that all TV revenue be shared equally. And all bowl revenue as well. It cannot be amended without a vote of the University Presidents. It takes more than a majority vote. (Trust me...I have been through all of this since FSU joined in 1992). Unless the Presidents agree to change the contract, all games between ND and the ACC, even if there are ten of them, will be OOC games.
It takes months to negotiate a new member to any conference. It would take longer than that if a member has its own TV contract. Let's lay this out. Clemson is at ND this year. ND owns all the TV rights to that game. You want ND to keep all that revenue...but have it count as a conference game and get access to the champ game...in direct violation of the current ACC contract? Are you listening to yourselves? I understand that Swofford wants to work with ND, but he has to manage the rest of the ACC.
People say that the ACC needs ND more than ND needs the ACC. Hmmmm. There is no doubt that Swofford's expansion plans to get BC and Syracuse (and Pitt) into the ACC was to drive ND out of its Big East contract and fully join the ACC. It didn't work. If ND drops its relationship with the ACC, expect to see a movement by the football powers of the ACC to shrink the conference and dump the northern schools. Swofford already announced his retirement. Dan Radakovich (former GT AD and current Clemson AD) is in the lead to replace him.