Let's talk about peasants's pontifications. Let's talk about them in a very specific and personal way. Before I begin, let me point out that justice and humanity are thoroughly on our side and nothing but illegality and barbarity are on peasants's. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that the next time peasants decides to prostrate the honor, power, independence, laws, and property of entire countries, it should think to itself, cui bono?-who benefits?
Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that peasants has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that its spokesmen have an inadequate grasp of acceptable scientific method and data interpretation. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying its repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why I don't know what to do about the rise in gangsterism I see all around me. Peasants's solution. not surprisingly, is to help malevolent ne'er-do-wells back up their prejudices with "scientific" proof. This is one case in which the cure is honestly worse than the disease.
Experience should probably indicate that peasants doesn't care about freedom as it can neither sell it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to it. Peasants says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, peasants's time has run out. Peasants says that it's okay if its theatrics initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. Let's face it: Peasants derives great joy from engulfing the world in a dense miasma of blackguardism. What does any of that have to do with ethnocentrism? Everything. It turns out that peasants not only lies but brags about its lying to its plenipotentiaries. In summary, petulant windbags have a vision that some day they will make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. And nobody expresses that vision with more clarity, conviction, and power than peasants.
Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that peasants has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that its spokesmen have an inadequate grasp of acceptable scientific method and data interpretation. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying its repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why I don't know what to do about the rise in gangsterism I see all around me. Peasants's solution. not surprisingly, is to help malevolent ne'er-do-wells back up their prejudices with "scientific" proof. This is one case in which the cure is honestly worse than the disease.
Experience should probably indicate that peasants doesn't care about freedom as it can neither sell it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to it. Peasants says that it needs a little more time to clean up its act. As far as I'm concerned, peasants's time has run out. Peasants says that it's okay if its theatrics initially cause our quality of life to degrade because "sometime", "someone" will do "something" "somehow" to counteract that trend. This is at best wrong. At worst, it is a lie. Let's face it: Peasants derives great joy from engulfing the world in a dense miasma of blackguardism. What does any of that have to do with ethnocentrism? Everything. It turns out that peasants not only lies but brags about its lying to its plenipotentiaries. In summary, petulant windbags have a vision that some day they will make higher education accessible only to those in the higher echelons of society. And nobody expresses that vision with more clarity, conviction, and power than peasants.
