ADVERTISEMENT

SCOTUS rules 9-0 against NCAA in sports decision restricting financial benefits

kwsusmc

All Star
Gold Member
Dec 27, 2005
38,134
46,766
113

The Supreme Court ruled in a unanimous decision Monday that the NCAA has illegally restricted education-based benefits that could be used as compensation to student athletes.

The decision upheld lower court rulings that generally maintained the NCAA's rules of generally forbidding payment to student athletes, while allowing for education-related aid.

"To the extent [the NCAA] means to propose a sort of judicially ordained immunity from the terms of the Sherman Act for its restraints of trade—that we should overlook its restrictions because they happen to fall at the intersection of higher education, sports, and money—we cannot agree," Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the court's opinion.

****My opinion**** a lot to unpack here, not sure what this will exactly mean, change? Especially with NIL.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back