Of the current top 25 scoring defenses (only stat that really matters) in college football here are some names for you...
Houston
Wisconsin
Kansas State
Washington
Maryland
Lousiana State
Army
Boston College
Air Force
Boise State
Utah
Georgia Tech
Iowa
Western Michigan
South Carolina
Those teams make up 15 of the top 25 scoring defenses nationally... find me one team in that group who has recruited better defensively than Notre Dame? Go through your star rankings and find me a team with "better" players.
It's not just about talent. Landing elite players helps, but the vast majority of success at the college level is a combination of fundamental development, energy, toughness and coaches who piy players in position to execute and demand that they do so.
The reason why ND doesn't have a similar defense to those listed above is not because those teams havr more talent... ND will send more players to the NFL than a lot of those teams. The problem was that VanGorder was running an outdated NFL scheme, that had no business in college football. A scheme that relies on having top notch players at every position (like in the NFL) which is a ridiculous concept for all but very few teams nationally... definetely not sustainable at a school like ND, that can't pull Alabama / Ohio State talent in every year.
ND needs a learnable scheme, a demanding defensive coordinator who is obssessed with fundamentals and their development rather than installation, and they most of all they need somone who demands accountability and toughness... When a guy is playing like shit, he needs to get yanked in favour of somebody else. But before that can happen, ND must install a defense that the entire unit understands. You can't pull a guy if he's the only player in the program at his position that understands the scheme.
I'm tired of hearing the word "smart" as the first way of describing ND's "best" defensive players... In ND's case, that is simply a cover for "the only guy who gets it".
Stop with the "there is no talent" crap. The talent has simply been neglected and there has been a disconnect in their development, in favour of scheme installation... If ND's group of across 4 stars were coached like they are at many of the teams I listed, they'd have similar results.
Perse, this one is for you... If ND has no defensive talent, explain how they have more starpower (across the board) and better offer lists than the defensive players on every team I listed?
Is it that there is less talent, or that those teams have recruited complete classes of lower ranked kids, developed them well, put them into a position to succeed, developed a culture of toughness and called a quality defense on gameday?
Houston
Wisconsin
Kansas State
Washington
Maryland
Lousiana State
Army
Boston College
Air Force
Boise State
Utah
Georgia Tech
Iowa
Western Michigan
South Carolina
Those teams make up 15 of the top 25 scoring defenses nationally... find me one team in that group who has recruited better defensively than Notre Dame? Go through your star rankings and find me a team with "better" players.
It's not just about talent. Landing elite players helps, but the vast majority of success at the college level is a combination of fundamental development, energy, toughness and coaches who piy players in position to execute and demand that they do so.
The reason why ND doesn't have a similar defense to those listed above is not because those teams havr more talent... ND will send more players to the NFL than a lot of those teams. The problem was that VanGorder was running an outdated NFL scheme, that had no business in college football. A scheme that relies on having top notch players at every position (like in the NFL) which is a ridiculous concept for all but very few teams nationally... definetely not sustainable at a school like ND, that can't pull Alabama / Ohio State talent in every year.
ND needs a learnable scheme, a demanding defensive coordinator who is obssessed with fundamentals and their development rather than installation, and they most of all they need somone who demands accountability and toughness... When a guy is playing like shit, he needs to get yanked in favour of somebody else. But before that can happen, ND must install a defense that the entire unit understands. You can't pull a guy if he's the only player in the program at his position that understands the scheme.
I'm tired of hearing the word "smart" as the first way of describing ND's "best" defensive players... In ND's case, that is simply a cover for "the only guy who gets it".
Stop with the "there is no talent" crap. The talent has simply been neglected and there has been a disconnect in their development, in favour of scheme installation... If ND's group of across 4 stars were coached like they are at many of the teams I listed, they'd have similar results.
Perse, this one is for you... If ND has no defensive talent, explain how they have more starpower (across the board) and better offer lists than the defensive players on every team I listed?
Is it that there is less talent, or that those teams have recruited complete classes of lower ranked kids, developed them well, put them into a position to succeed, developed a culture of toughness and called a quality defense on gameday?