Coach, based on posts you believe EG is the most accurate passer, correct? If Malik is over 59% (EGs career accuracy 59%) and his TD to INT ratio is greater than 2/1 in games/year surpassing EG, in your OP does Malik qualify as an accurate passer? Do you feel those are fairly effective measures?
Let's discuss in the fall too? Should be interesting.
IMO, Malik needs the benefit of the doubt especially from Mods as these kids may view threads. Until it can be proven in a "game or live" environment that Malik is not accurate, there is no positive projecting otherwise. At least when making the argument we shouldn't discount his live game experience and say that doesn't count because, then use media practice views to illustrate where he is as a passer today. Coach Pat Dye/Auburn on Bo Jackson, not a good practice player and never worked hard, but on game day Bo was something special. Some practice players just elevate on game day. Thoughts?
Let's discuss in the fall too? Should be interesting.
IMO, Malik needs the benefit of the doubt especially from Mods as these kids may view threads. Until it can be proven in a "game or live" environment that Malik is not accurate, there is no positive projecting otherwise. At least when making the argument we shouldn't discount his live game experience and say that doesn't count because, then use media practice views to illustrate where he is as a passer today. Coach Pat Dye/Auburn on Bo Jackson, not a good practice player and never worked hard, but on game day Bo was something special. Some practice players just elevate on game day. Thoughts?
