as a possible replacement for our coach Clay Helton when we started the year at 1-3 and looked bad doing it....fortunately, it turned out better than anyone could have hoped for as the Trojans reeled off eight straight wins....congrats on putting up a good fight but that #99 of yours is one dirty player.
As a Trojan you should know that SC people were considering Kelly..
- Thread starter MARTY SC PSYC
- Start date
What the hell are you so upset about?....oh, that's right SC beat your ass and all you have is Tillery who will probably be arrested in the offseason.
Who were the Sc players that raped a student this past off season? I forgot their names.
This may be the best example of throwing stones from a glass house EVER.
More garbage from 23.
Don't know what got into Tillery, he seems like a nice kid, had a lot of face time in last's years Showtime's Season with Notre Dame Football as a freshman. No excuses but why come to an Irish board to complain about it and then get upset when Irish posters (who are already venting about the coach and season) fire back at you.
Doubt if many Irish fans thought ND would beat SC this season. Probably more like you weren't here before the game to post, why come after the game to complain?
Because he's a douche nozzle. That's the beauty of anonymity. I probably live down the street from him. Too bad we'll never know.
At least he wont lie about saving a drowning child or lead police on a chase after murdering 2 people. UOJ rules. Enjoy the Who Cares Bowl.
Really?.....the "Who Cares Bowl"?.....you mean a bowl game that Notre Dame fans would give their left nut to be in?....that bowl?
no they wouldn't.....we have a closet full of Who Cares Bowl mementos collecting dust already.
Actually I like your sense of humor. You're going to need it in the coming months.
What game did you watch? And what was the score at halftime during the UCLA game while we are at it? Take your pick!
glad I could help...Since Lou was jettisoned...I have a well-oiled, albeit well-worn sense of humor. Sort of the yen and yang of things.
Where I come from returning a punt for a TD and a Kick off as well as a QB throwing a ball to a DB for a Pick 6 but letting another teams RB rush for 180 yards is not dominating but okay. I call that more examples of poor coaching decisions and fortunate breaks for USC. Yes they won the game but I also think ND gave them tremendous help.
Total yards - 408 to 412. TOP- 28:57 to 31:03. 1st downs - 23 each Turnovers 2-1. With one being a pick six. Take that turnover off the board and the bullshit targeting penalty and it's a different game even with the kick returns. The Pick was an unforced error. Oh and by the way, on the PI play a few plays after the targeting call the Left Tackle for SC jumped offsides as the Slot was in motion.missed by the refs. I get it some of you want Kelly gone and so do I but don't concede that was an ass kicking just because you think it'll make it happen. According to all these SC people they can beat anyone. They should be in the playoff. The last two weeks they have had a hard time with two huge disappointments in UCLA and ND. Yet the real playoff contenders all rolled their opponents. The way a dominate team does.
They took their two biggest rivals to task with no question of the outcome in doubt
I will watch the game this evening to see if I've read is true
They are called "rivalry" games for a reason....Alabama may have a great defense but even they haven't scored "50" on an opponent yet still were the obviously better team.
Come on Marty...I like you as a poster, but this isn't a serious post. "SC people"...like who? A few posters on a message board perhaps, but there was never any conversation among SC people about this.
So I guess you're right....SC really isn't any good even though the so-called SEC biased pundits believe that right now no one outside of Alabama would want to play the Trojans....
No, I agree with you and I should have qualified my response and said that there are "some" that still, (and that was much earlier in the season), felt Brian Kelly was a coach with Power 5 winning experience.
Didn't say they aren't good. They are solid. But the playoff talk is nonsensical. The Rose Bowl talk is ridiculous. The chest beating and coming on here with the patronizing post is ridiculous. Being excited about four quarter victories over two teams with 8 combined wins is sad. And I'd take Clemson and Ohio State and would love to see SC best UW twice.
First off, it's the Pac-12 so try to get your facts straight....and how is Washington the "cream" of the Conference when SC waxed them at their place?....
The playoff talk for SC is ridiculous but I don't think the Rose Bowl talk is, If Washington wins the CCG and goes to the playoffs, SC is in the Rose bowl automatically.
Beach....I, also, expect Washington to beat Colorado and it is my understanding that the "highest rated 2nd place team in the Conference" will get the invitation to the Rose Bowl which should be us.....of course, it depends how far down in the polls Colorado lands after losing in the Pac-12 Championship.
Yes that is true but a three loss Colorado team will be lower than a three loss USC team, since we won the head to head IMO
Good point.... both my kids are CU graduates and my son feels that Colorado isn't getting enough credit pointing to the stats of the teams defense nationally but I explained to him that the committee will not look at those statistics and instead look at the strength of the overall conference.
I think we are close enough in the polls that e will pass them is they lose.
If your team is not in the playoff nobody cares especially on the ND board.
Well I was talking about the Rose bowl not the playoffs and I wasn't I who raised the issue you apparently you are wrong.
