I have 3 that come to mind.
1. MTA. He just carries his weight more easily than Bonner. Bonner is a 3-4 ILB we bulked up to play in order WDE, SDE and then 3T. I think MTA is naturally bigger and as quick. He was a 3T as soon as he stepped on campus. Great first game.
2. Weishar. The TEs were targeted a lot last week. More than I recall from past teams except when Eifert was here. I think they were targeted about 11 or 12 times. Weishar is probably our best receiving TE and I feel more comfortable targeting him than Mack right now. I think Smythe might really be needed to help the RT.
3. Claypool. Time to take advantage of the mismatch he creates against DBs. Great catch radius. Wimbush is supposed to have an accurate arm. He would be a good target this game I think since he won't be double covered like EQ probably will be. Claypool at the Y (Field receiver unless EQ goes there.).
1. MTA. He just carries his weight more easily than Bonner. Bonner is a 3-4 ILB we bulked up to play in order WDE, SDE and then 3T. I think MTA is naturally bigger and as quick. He was a 3T as soon as he stepped on campus. Great first game.
2. Weishar. The TEs were targeted a lot last week. More than I recall from past teams except when Eifert was here. I think they were targeted about 11 or 12 times. Weishar is probably our best receiving TE and I feel more comfortable targeting him than Mack right now. I think Smythe might really be needed to help the RT.
3. Claypool. Time to take advantage of the mismatch he creates against DBs. Great catch radius. Wimbush is supposed to have an accurate arm. He would be a good target this game I think since he won't be double covered like EQ probably will be. Claypool at the Y (Field receiver unless EQ goes there.).