She will retire if Democrats win the Senate this year (very unlikely). If not she's not going anywhere until 2020 at least. Not to mention Breyer is 80 also.
OT: I think we can all agree on this
- Thread starter TOMMY_23
- Start date
oh, then she was the one in In ‘The Year of Living Dangerously’ played Billy Kwan ?
That would be very interesting when, Feinstein comes out and says again that Barrett is “ Too dogmatic in her Catholicism. “. Then we will really know just how bigoted they really are ! They will sure try to play
The Roe v Wade card bid time. They have noting else !
One can not say the Democrats are against Catholics, but they certainly love the “ Catholics like
The Kennedy’s , especially “ Teddy, the swimmer “ ! So they will claim that they are not anti Catholic !
They are only against Catholics who believe in Catholicism and follow the dogmas of their
Faith!
They will also claim that they believe in freedom of religion, but Catholics”need not apply “ for vacancies on the SC !
Last edited:
in case you missed Feinenstiens latest bigoted statement! (which some may consider a bit too ....)
“Why is it that so many of us on this side have this very uncomfortable feeling that — you know, dogma and law are two different things. And I think whatever a religion is, it has its own dogma. The law is totally different. And I think in your case, professor, when you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country.”
“Why is it that so many of us on this side have this very uncomfortable feeling that — you know, dogma and law are two different things. And I think whatever a religion is, it has its own dogma. The law is totally different. And I think in your case, professor, when you read your speeches, the conclusion one draws is that the dogma lives loudly within you, and that’s of concern when you come to big issues that large numbers of people have fought for years in this country.”
California gives us Feinstein, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters and Jerry Moonbeam Brown. They know how to pick em.
The Constitution, of course, prohibits religious tests, saying that " … no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” Some on the right now say Feinstein is violating that, too.
what do you get when you breed hate and a bigot?
A Democrate!
Would Fienenstien say a candidate was too Black? or too Jewish?
Is Booker too Black? Is she too Jewish?
If a Christian said such a thing there would be a cry heard round the world!
And she has violated the U.S Consitution with her comments. She should be censured !
In fact she ought be put on a rocket and fired off into outter space!
A Democrate!
Would Fienenstien say a candidate was too Black? or too Jewish?
Is Booker too Black? Is she too Jewish?
If a Christian said such a thing there would be a cry heard round the world!
And she has violated the U.S Consitution with her comments. She should be censured !
In fact she ought be put on a rocket and fired off into outter space!
Last edited:
Anti Israel, anti Semitic, and American Jews vote for them in droves.
Nobody believes that any more. Even Dems with a brain can see that.
You are correct. It is an anomaly. Being a MOT... I vote for the conservatives.
Are you going to volunteer to house some of the Honduran illegals coming up?
Last edited:
Illegal Honduran aliens
You've seen the pictures of them marching to the US flying their nation flag?
Why do you think that is?
Corrected that.
Yea, I’m SHOCKED they aren’t coming up here after the mid-term elections.
That fact that you don't see what is now an onslaught of illegal aliens expecting just to beable to walk right through unopposed is troubling.
To hell with the rule of law right? To hell with the burden on the poor county they'll end up at right?
To hell with the citizens that have to bare the burden of supporting them because one fact is for sure...illegal aliens are a net lose. They will take is services than they'll put in.
At what point Ivan to we say enough is enough?
The 20(+) million already here not good
enough?
You have no idea whose hidden in the mix,, and you obviously don't care
