Is Irish.
Thoughts on him ?
I’m no talent evaluator but I liked him on defense.
Thoughts on him ?
I’m no talent evaluator but I liked him on defense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I read the write up n Driskell’s site and wondered the same thing……could he eventually be a Safety?I think he’s a high floor low ceiling kind of player. He will definitely contribute as a receiver, and probably as a good depth part of our receiver group. Personally, I think Meadows and Taylor offer a lot more upside, and I hope we continue to recruit both really hard. I think if we were to get both, this would make five receivers for the class, which is a lot given our needs elsewhere. I read several months ago that some think Bettis has a higher ceiling as a safety. I‘ve not seen any indication that ND sees him as such, and every indication is that he prefers receiver. But if we were to get Meadows and Taylor, I hope both ND and Bettis would explore this option.
IrishMike…I don’t subscribe to wherever Driskell is employed. Not sure where I read this, but a free site for sure. Probably in a doctor’s office waiting room! He does play defense in high school, along with receiver, and he closes on the ball quickly and shows really good instinct In terms of angles and timing, etc…. He also flashes as a hard tackler as well. As a receiver, he impresses with really outstanding hands, and the timing alluded to above applies here as well.I read the write up n Driskell’s site and wondered the same thing……could he eventually be a Safety?
It’ll likely be 30 months before he’s asked to contribute in a game. A lot of developing can happen in that time.
Brilliant! 🙄Hard charging 3 star mini bus nepo dude offered by A&M and GT!
30 months? Thanks, Mel.I read the write up n Driskell’s site and wondered the same thing……could he eventually be a Safety?
It’ll likely be 30 months before he’s asked to contribute in a game. A lot of developing can happen in that time.
52 is kind of old to play, but I guess if Tyson can do it why not. Also, I like him better at RB.Is Irish.
Thoughts on him ?
I’m no talent evaluator but I liked him on defense.
Gotta figure 6 months until seasons starts give or take, and he’s likely not a guys who’s expected to contribute year 1 or year 2….30 months? Thanks, Mel.
I don’t subscribe either Telx. Driskell is kind enough to provide some damn good content at no-charge.IrishMike…I don’t subscribe to wherever Driskell is employed. Not sure where I read this, but a free site for sure. Probably in a doctor’s office waiting room! He does play defense in high school, along with receiver, and he closes on the ball quickly and shows really good instinct In terms of angles and timing, etc…. He also flashes as a hard tackler as well. As a receiver, he impresses with really outstanding hands, and the timing alluded to above applies here as well.
I think he's the worst WR prospect we've landed since Jay BrunelleIs Irish.
Thoughts on him ?
I’m no talent evaluator but I liked him on defense.
Ouch!I think he's the worst WR prospect we've landed since Jay Brunelle
What service is he connected with now?I don’t subscribe either Telx. Driskell is kind enough to provide some damn good content at no-charge.
I don’t agree with all of his takes, but the content is rock solid. He and his team do a nice job covering the Irish year-round.
Solid pickup by ND, plus he's a legacy.I read the write up n Driskell’s site and wondered the same thing……could he eventually be a Safety?
It’ll likely be 30 months before he’s asked to contribute in a game. A lot of developing can happen in that time.
So what. Nfl teams make mistakes all the time. And that's after watching college filmSolid pickup by ND, plus he's a legacy.
Not impressed at all with Driskell's talent evaluations. The guy was calling Tyler Buchner a dynamic QB who was going to light it up.
He's been wrong more than he's been right. 😂So what. Nfl teams make mistakes all the time. And that's after watching college film
He does a good job. No talent evaluator is going to be close to 100%.
You embarrass yourself each time you post.Stop, you are embarrassing yourself.
I do not listen to or read one word that Bryan Driskell writes or says.Solid pickup by ND, plus he's a legacy.
Not impressed at all with Driskell's talent evaluations. The guy was calling Tyler Buchner a dynamic QB who was going to light it up.
I get it, but I’m there for the ND talk. He’s got it going everyday, and it’s solid stuff. This board dries up at times during the year….Solid pickup by ND, plus he's a legacy.
Not impressed at all with Driskell's talent evaluations. The guy was calling Tyler Buchner a dynamic QB who was going to light it up.
Here you go:What service is he connected with now?
I agree, I like the board as well, but I honestly don't believe he's a good evaluator of talent.I get it, but I’m there for the ND talk. He’s got it going everyday, and it’s solid stuff. This board dries up at times during the year….
I put your image into Google AI and it came back with a negative IQ 😂😂😂😂You embarrass yourself each time you post.
Stop, you are embarrassing yourself. 🤣🤣🤣🤣. You think I care about that stupid ass post
Good for a laugh
👍I put your image into Google AI and it came back with a negative IQ 😂😂😂😂
We’ll see how it shakes out for the kid.I agree, I like the board as well, but I honestly don't believe he's a good evaluator of talent.
Although he has some positives to say about Bettis Jr., I don't agree with his take on his speed. Bettis is a big framed receiver. with good hands. If anyone has watched his film, he's not afraid to go up and take the ball. He's aggressive which is what you need at the WR position, someone that's going to go up and fight for the ball. He's also got speed. I mean the kid was clocking a 10.7 100m as a jr. and is only going to get faster and stronger. I could see him finishing as 4 star.
Show that proof that he ran a 10.7I agree, I like the board as well, but I honestly don't believe he's a good evaluator of talent.
Although he has some positives to say about Bettis Jr., I don't agree with his take on his speed. Bettis is a big framed receiver. with good hands. If anyone has watched his film, he's not afraid to go up and take the ball. He's aggressive which is what you need at the WR position, someone that's going to go up and fight for the ball. He's also got speed. I mean the kid was clocking a 10.7 100m as a jr. and is only going to get faster and stronger. I could see him finishing as 4 star.
Thanks!Here you go:
Sports Illustrated Notre Dame Fighting Irish News, Analysis and More
IrishBreakdown is a Sports Illustrated channel featuring Bryan Driskell to bring you the latest News, Highlights, Analysis, Recruiting surrounding the Notre Dame Fighting Irish.www.si.com
No he hasn’t. He clocked a 4.77 40 recentlyI agree, I like the board as well, but I honestly don't believe he's a good evaluator of talent.
Although he has some positives to say about Bettis Jr., I don't agree with his take on his speed. Bettis is a big framed receiver. with good hands. If anyone has watched his film, he's not afraid to go up and take the ball. He's aggressive which is what you need at the WR position, someone that's going to go up and fight for the ball. He's also got speed. I mean the kid was clocking a 10.7 100m as a jr. and is only going to get faster and stronger. I could see him finishing as 4 star.
Where is that 10.7 you mentionedI agree, I like the board as well, but I honestly don't believe he's a good evaluator of talent.
Although he has some positives to say about Bettis Jr., I don't agree with his take on his speed. Bettis is a big framed receiver. with good hands. If anyone has watched his film, he's not afraid to go up and take the ball. He's aggressive which is what you need at the WR position, someone that's going to go up and fight for the ball. He's also got speed. I mean the kid was clocking a 10.7 100m as a jr. and is only going to get faster and stronger. I could see him finishing as 4 star.
Look it up yourself? Are you lazy, stupid, or both.Where is that 10.7 you mentioned
It's not factual. You made it up. So prove itLook it up yourself? Are you lazy, stupid, or both.